The original intent of the American Constitution subverted by the 14th Amendment!

The 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States

Knowing true history gives us a better understanding of the present. I don’t know about you, but I sure never truly understood the significance of the 14th Amendment of the American Constitution until I read what Eric Phelps has to say about it in his book, “Vatican Assassins“. Some people blame Abraham Lincoln for increasing federal power, but I don’t see how Lincoln had anything to do with the 14th Amendment. He was assassinated 3 years prior the ratification of the Amendment. The forcing of the 14th Amendment on the American people could be one of the reasons why Abraham Lincoln was assassinated! Lincoln believed in a conspiracy by the Roman Catholic church and the Jesuits to take over the political power of the United States. He directly blamed the Civil War on Rome and the Jesuits! I’m sure Lincoln would never have agreed to the ratification of the 14th Amendment.

“The common people see and hear the big, noisy wheels of the Southern Confederacy’s cars; they call they Jeff Davis, Lee, Toombs, Beauregard, Semmes, ect., and they honestly think that they are the motive power, the first cause of our troubles. But this is a mistake. The true motive power is secreted behind the thick walls of the Vatican, the colleges and schools of the Jesuits, the convents of the nuns, and the confessional boxes of Rome.” Abraham Lincoln

The following are excepts from chapter 27 of Vatican Assassins by Eric Jon Phelps

The coup d’etat is in the first sentence. It made all persons born in the United States (excluding the Indian nations) citizens of the United States first and citizens of a State secondly. This reversed the original American citizenship.

The Jesuits had successfully waged a war between two sovereign nations, the United States of America and the Confederate States of America. The despots of the Jesuits’ Holy Alliance had sided with the North, and thus, the Southern people fought the world. The deceived patriots of the North fought to “save the Union” but they in fact destroyed it, and on its ruins the Jesuits, with their Freemasons, would erect a new Union — a new United Socialist States of America.

This new nation would be a Jesuit socialist republic with the President exercising powers of an absolute Monarch. The old Calvinistic Federal Republic of Washington would be converted into a huge centralized Empire with the ten planks of the Masonic Communist Manifesto replacing The Ten Commandments of Moses.

In order to accomplish this, the Constitution had to be amended — “by hook or by crook.” It would be amended in accordance with the Masonic cry of both French Revolutions. “Liberty” would be the Thirteenth Amendment. “Equality” would be the Fourteenth Amendment. “Fraternity” would be the Fifteenth Amendment. We now will examine the forced ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment with all its tyranny and usurpation, as it was the coup d’etat.

On July 28, 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment was declared “ratified” by the Radicals in Washington. Since 1866 the Southern States had been under martial law and divided into five military districts. The districts were governed by five Union Generals beholden to the Jesuits, including General Benjamin F. Butler known as “Butler the Beast.” The wicked Thaddeus Stevens with his “Reconstruction Act” of 1866 had implemented martial law. And why? Because the Southern State governments, having ratified the Thirteenth Amendment, refused to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment. So the solution of the Radicals, to the disgrace of the Protestant ministers and people of the North, was to suspend the lawful State governments and impose martial law (absolutism). The only way the Southern States could be readmitted into this new “Union of North American Socialist Republics,” thereby ending martial law, was to “ratify” this new amendment. That is called “consent at the point of a bayonet” or “forced conversion of heretics.”

Why was the Fourteenth Amendment, forced on the South by the Jacobins of the North, so important to the Jesuits and their despots of Europe, including the Protestant Queen Victoria of England whose policies were dictated by her Jesuit-controlled Prime Ministers, Lord John Russell and Viscount Palmerston? Section 1 of the Amendment reads:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” {5}

The coup d’etat is in the first sentence. It made all persons born in the United States (excluding the Indian nations) citizens of the United States first and citizens of a State secondly. This reversed the original American citizenship. Senator James G. Blaine, one of the Radical Red Republicans of the day, explained:

“In the first place, we ask that they will agree to certain changes in the Constitution of the United States; and, to begin with, we want them to unite with us in broadening the citizenship of the Republic. The slaves recently emancipated by proclamation, and subsequently by Constitutional Amendment, have no civil status. They should be made citizens, and in making this extension of citizenship, we are not confining the breadth and scope of our efforts to the negro. It is for the white man as well. We intend to make citizenship National. Heretofore, a man has been a citizen of the United States because he was a citizen of some one of the States: Now, we propose to reverse that, and make him a citizen of any State where he chooses to reside, by defining in advance his National citizenship — and our Amendment declares that ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States [State] wherein they reside.’ ” {6} [Emphasis added]

Years later our Jesuit-controlled Supreme Court, in describing the effect of the Fourteenth Amendment, would say the same as its radical authors.

“ ‘In reviewing the subject,’ [“Jesuitical”] Chief Justice White [according to our hero Jeremiah Crowley] said in the Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 US 366, 377, 388-389, ‘ . . . it broadened the national scope of the Government under the Constitution by causing citizenship of the United States to be paramount and dominant instead of being subordinate and derivative, and therefore, operating as it does upon all the powers conferred by the Constitution.’ ” {7} [Emphasis added]

Simply put, by reversing American citizenship and making it “National,” all the powers of the government, granted by the Constitution, were greatly increased. A new citizenship created a new government. All the executive, legislative and judicial powers in Washington were “broadened.” So the radicals, pretending to do good to the Black freedman, used these freedmen to centralize and increase Rome’s (the Church of Rome, the Vatican’s) power in Washington with the Fourteenth Amendment.

Many Southern statesmen knew the true purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment. The former Vice-President of the Confederacy, Alexander Stephens, was one of them. He wrote:

“These monstrous Reconstruction Measures, with all their enormities and fatal tendencies towards ultimate complete Centralism and Empire, are still based upon the assumption that the States, as separate integral parts, constitute members of what is still, in words, at least, acknowledged to be a Federal Union! All these bold usurpations of power are, upon their face, nothing but resorts to induce, or to compel, under duress, the Peoples of the several Southern States to go through the forms of adopting the Fourteenth Amendment . . . ” {8}

The Freemason Alexander H. Stephens knew that the forced ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment would create a centralized Empire out of a federation of sovereign States. The President would exercise powers of a Monarch, the Congress would exercise powers of a Parliament and the Supreme Court would exercise powers of a King’s Bench, having its jurisdiction extended to include anything and everything under the guise of the new “Federal Question Jurisdiction.”

Read the rest of this chapter from Vatican Assassins


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *