HomeSoteriologyThe Abandoning of the Protestant Reformed Religion

Comments

The Abandoning of the Protestant Reformed Religion — 5 Comments

  1. James stated:

    “I have never ever in all my 53 years of following the Lord Jesus Christ heard or read this doctrine before! If there is no free will involved, why would Jesus even say such a thing? “If any man hear my voice, and open the door…” That sure sounds like free will to me. Jesus is asking people to make a choice either for Him or against Him. If there is no free will, why does the Bible even tell us to “choose“?”

    Fallen mankind does have a free will, but, in its natural state, that will is bound to its sin nature and cannot understand the things of the Spirit in such a way that there is a SPIRITUALLY (i.e., new birth) believing response. Just a few verses to consider:

    1 Corinthians 2:14
    “But the NATURAL MAN RECEIVETH NOT THE THINGS OF GOD: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” (The new birth is required first in order to believe)

    Can fallen man ‘decide’ to come to a faith in Jesus Christ? “No man” encompasses EVERYONE. Without the sovereign act by God the Father, NO ONE will come to Christ:

    John 6:44
    “NO MAN CAN COME TO ME, except the Father which hath sent me DRAW HIM: and I will raise him up at the last day.”

    Is saving ‘faith’ something that we personally decide upon, or, is it a solely a gift from God? (The following is a verse that is often quoted, however, if you point out that FAITH is a gift from God, they typically appear perplexed!)

    Ephesians 2:8
    “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that NOT OF YOURSELVES: it is the GIFT of God:”

    (Block lettering added for emphasis)

    Many years ago, I read the Catholic humanist Erasmus’s treatise entitled “Free Will,” followed by Luther’s answer to Erasmus’s treatise entitled “The Bondage of the Will.” While reading Erasmus, I had the overwhelming sense that he was declaring essentially the common, modern day evangelical position on what I refer to as decisional regeneration, which is of course based upon free will. On the other hand, Luther used the Scriptures as the foundation to state his case, which is that because of the Fall, mankind is not only wounded spiritually, he is DEAD, and possesses a ‘free will’ that cannot respond, in an effective manner, without a sovereign act of God.

    Incidentally, Luther himself complimented Erasmus for understanding the true issue upon which the Reformers based their position upon; the depravity of mankind, due to the fall, which led to a will that was naturally against the things of God, and the Catholic position, which was based upon the agency of mankind’s free will.

    In my opinion, ‘free will’ is the main foundation upon which the false ecumenical movement is based upon.

  2. It must be viewed in context, knowing of course that the epistles were letters:

    ” I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;

    ” For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.

    For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;

    Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.”

    Kings and government officials, much like today, were viewed as oppressors, and Paul is instructing believers to have a proper attitude towards them, knowing that our battle is spiritual in nature. It was easy to have a wrong attitude towards those that are in authority, who often abuse their power. Therefore, in my opinion, Paul is stating that even those that many may view as an enemy should be prayed for, being that even they can be saved. Only God knows who the elect are, we don’t. The Roman Centurion is certainly one example. This also is beneficial to believers because it instills the correct, humble attitude that we should have towards all people, including “Kings” and those in “authority,” which often are the instruments of oppression. Similarly, Paul himself was the ultimate oppressor before the Lord Jesus Christ sovereignly met him on the road to Damascus. While Paul’s fellow travelers saw the light, they did not hear the Lord’s voice. Why? Because the message was only meant for Paul. Had Jesus wanted them to be saved as well, hearing His message to Paul certainly would have had a powerful effect.

    If 1 Timothy 2:4 is teaching that God desires the salvation of each individual, then why didn’t Jesus pray for the entire world to be saved? Nowhere in Scripture is such a prayer recorded. Instead, Jesus prayed “I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine.” – John 17:9

    When teaching parables, was it due to what is typically stated, which is, in order to teach valuable spiritual lessons in a manner that people could understand and relate to, or was it according to what Jesus stated?

    After declaring the parable of the Sower and the Seed to the multitude, Jesus said this to His disciples:

    10 And when he was alone, they that were about him with the twelve asked of him the parable.

    11 And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables:

    12 That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.

    13 And he said unto them, Know ye not this parable? and how then will ye know all parables?

    Jesus then went on to explain in detail the meaning of the parable, an explanation which was withheld from the multitude!

    We need to keep in mind that the entire human race was put on trial in the Garden with Adam. Adam was our representative. He was created without the sin nature, yet he willfully sinned, and when he did, he died spiritually. (“But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” – Genesis 2:17)

    All of us have inherited that dead spiritual nature, and without a sovereign, merciful act of God, we would be left spiritually dead, with a ‘free will’ that is totally bound to our sinful nature when it comes to the spiritual things of God.

    All of the so-called Arminian verses in the Bible need to be viewed within the context of where they appear, and they must be diligently compared to other passages of the Bible that further declares the Sovereignty of God.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

James Japan