Climate Change & The New World Order

This is a transcription of a podcast by Christian J. Pinto on Noise of Thunder Radio. Chris gave this talk on March 2, 2016 during the Obama administration, but it’s relevant more than ever today.

Partial transcription

Okay, praise the Lord you guys and welcome. I’m Chris Pinto. This is the Noise of Thunder Radio. Today in the show we’re going to talk about climate change and the New World Order.

Now, some of you probably have seen our film that we produced years ago called Megiddo, the March to Armageddon Bible Prophecy and the New World Order. And if you’ve seen that film, which was produced more than 10 years ago, at the time, much of the information driving this need for a New World Order was to avoid global catastrophe in terms of a nuclear war. And for those of us who grew up and lived through the Cold War era, through the Ronald Reagan era, until the Berlin Wall came down and the Soviet Union fell, that whole era was under this shadow, this cloud of nuclear catastrophe, because you got these superpowers, the United States and Russia, and they could be involved in a conflict at any point. And if that happens, what’s going to happen if there’s nuclear war?

We present all these quotes from different leaders and thinkers, very well-known people throughout history, throughout the 20th century, who were talking about the need for global government and or a new world order.

And of course in more modern times probably the most prominent figure to use the term New World Order was George H.W. Bush, Bush Sr. Very straightforward. Not even hiding the phrase, but using that phrase quite directly. Pope John Paul II did the same thing.

We show in one of our films, Pope John Paul II, making reference to a new world order, how a new world order can be achieved. So this is definitely something that the Vatican is in on, it’s definitely something that the Jesuits are in on. It’s definitely something that the United Nations is in on. This is part of the purpose of the United Nations.

My point is in years past they have used it as an excuse or the problem because in everything that they do, the globalists use their crisis and solution formula, which is there’s got to be a problem, whether it’s real, imagined or manufactured. They come up with a problem and then there’s got to be a solution. The solution, of course, is always more power for them. It allows them to channel power into their hands, more control over the common people, one step closer to totalitarian government.

Well, now it appears that the latest problem that they have come up with that requires global intervention, and government activity at a global level is climate change. This is a new problem that is threatening the entire planet. It’s a planetary problem and of course, it requires a planetary solution. This is, you know, globalism.

Part of the reason I wanted to do this show today is because of a report, a news article that was published by the Telegraph over in the UK about Maurice Newman, who was the chairman of the Australian Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council back when Tony Abbott was the PM in Australia. He was later ousted by a leftist coup in that government. The whole thing is somewhat complex, but in Australia, apparently, they had the ability to completely usurp the democratic process of having the people decide who’s going to be in charge. And they affected some kind of coup d’etat where they were able to oust Tony Abbott and bring in his rival, Malcolm Turnbull, who was a liberal left-wing zealot.

And I suspect that what went on with Tony Abbott’s adviser on this whole issue of climate change because Abbott was on record stating effectively the climate change argument was nonsense. He used different language than that, but nevertheless, he basically said it was nonsense.

And so his adviser, Maurice Newman, this statement from him was reported in the Telegraph last year,

Australia PM advisor says climate change is a UN-led ruse to establish new world order.

Tony Abbott’s business advisor, it says, says global warming is a fallacy supported by the United Nations to create a new authoritarian world order under its control. So they’ve got the problem. The problem is climate change. The problem is global warming, et cetera.

Leonardo DiCaprio just won the Academy Award. He took the time, of course, to promote his climate change philosophy, talking about that issue in his acceptance speech, and giving it more attention.

Leonardo DiCaprio recently met with the Pope at the Vatican. You can go online and watch the video. DiCaprio shows up at the Vatican kissing Pope Francis’s ring. I didn’t realize DiCaprio was Catholic. He bows and kisses the ring of the Pope and goes and meets with the Pope of the Vatican to talk about climate change. Why? Because this is all part of the Vatican / Jesuit agenda. It is an instrument for gaining totalitarian control over the governments of the world. And this is the vehicle. This is the instrument that they are hoping to use.

And what’s very troubling is that we’ve got our own President, Barack Obama, who says this is the number one issue facing the world today. The number one threat to humanity, to our country, is global warming.

We’ve got real problems that are happening right now that Obama just sort of brushes off as unimportant. The real problem, he says, is climate change.

I want to read a few quotes from this article. It says,

Climate change is a hoax developed as part of a secret plot by the United Nations to undermine democracies and take over the world, a top advisor to Tony Abbott, Australia’s prime minister has warned.

I’m reading from the Telegraph here, not from a conspiracy theory. This is the UK Telegraph.

Maurice Newman, the chief business advisor to the prime minister, said the science showing links between human activity and the warming climate was wrong, but was being used as a hook by the UN to expand its global control. This is not about facts or logic. It’s about a new world order under the control of the UN. He wrote in the Australian. He went on to say, it is opposed to capitalism and freedom and has made environmental catastrophism a household topic to achieve its objective.

Now, he made this statement, then of course, the liberals there in Australia denounced him utterly and called for his removal, resignation, et cetera. He was, they called him, a “wacko.”

If you study what’s going on with these climate change fanatics, there are continual suggestions you find in different reports where they believe that anybody who disagrees with them on climate change should be punished, they should be looking at jail time. They should be looking at passing laws to silence people who say that climate change is not real. They want to create an inquisition around climate change. And then if you deny it, if you deny the so-called science of climate change, then you should be punished. This is the direction that they want to take this fanaticism.

Of course, they’re doing the same thing with everything else in the socialist agenda that’s pushing homosexuality and transgenderism. Look what they’re doing with gay marriage. If you say no to their gay marriage and you won’t make their gay wedding cakes, then you have to be punished. If you say no to transgenderism and you refuse to call a man a woman or him her, then you need to be punished like they’re doing in New York right now. You’ve got to pay a fine. You’ve got to be punished for that. Because you’re not going to argue. And they want to do the same thing with climate change.

The Democrats are trying to promote this bill in Congress that the latest update on it was at the beginning of February, the bill that wants to punish anybody who speaks against Islam. If you speak against Islam, if you use any kind of hateful rhetoric against the Islamic religion here in the United States, in America, not in a third-world country, not Pakistan, not Saudi Arabia, right here in America, the Democratic Party wants you to be punished for speaking against Islam in particular, not in the other religion, just Islam. That’s what they proposed in Congress.

The bill hasn’t passed yet, but it has gained more Democratic supporters. My understanding is there are no Republicans to date that have signed up on this bill. Of course, it would be the end of their career. If any Republicans signed off on that bill, I can’t imagine that anyone I would never, ever, ever vote for any Republican who agreed to something like this or any politician who agreed to anything like that.

It is the introduction of Sharia law in our system, but it all fits the pattern. It all fits the pattern of what the socialists are doing in this country and in other parts of the world. They want to shut down any sort of debate, shut down any disagreement. They are using the principles of the Inquisition because this is how the Inquisition operated. This is what made the Inquisition under Rome so intolerable and ultimately led to the great Reformation. The inquisitors did not want anybody to be able to argue with them.

They knew that this is how you’re going to understand Communion. You’re going to understand it through transubstantiation. That is the argument. That’s the interpretation. And that is what you must believe. And if you disagree, don’t go into your Bible and start quoting scriptures that disagree with the official argument, the official doctrine. You don’t want disagreement. There’s no dissent. That was the position of the Inquisition.

They did the same thing on matters of baptism, the authority of the pope, the papacy, etc. In all of these things, they pushed the envelope and then wanted to persecute anybody who opposed their interpretation. That was how it worked.

But pushing back against that, pushing back with the Word of God and ultimately declaring we ought to obey God rather than men, that is what led to the Reformation and the birth of the free world, the modern free world and generally in Western civilization.

There’s an old saying, it’s always darkest before the dawn. So who knows what all this is going to lead to, brethren?

There is another, well, we’ve talked about on this program. I wanted to mention this. The Vatican, of course, has employed the German climatologist Hans Schellnhuber, who advised Pope Francis. And we talked about how Schellnhuber made his comments that the one good thing he said somewhat, well, it was somewhat with a bit of sarcasm. He said the good thing about global warming is that it would destroy most of the Earth’s population and bring the world population below 1 billion people. That was what he said somewhat in a sarcastic manner.

But I’ve talked about this before. If you draw a line from there to the monument that was erected back in 1980 in Elbert and Georgia, the Georgia Guidestones, we’ve got our film, Dark Clouds over Elbert and the True Story of the Georgia Guidestones, if you go and study that monument and the philosophies that are being communicated there about maintaining a world population below 500 million people, it fits in with what we’re hearing from Schellnhuber. It’s the same mentality. They want to lower the world population.

And the socialists and the communists have been at this throughout the 20th century, this is what your concentration camps and your gulags and your killing fields, etc. That’s what all of these things are about. Massive reduction. When you think about Hitler and 6 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews, you think about Stalin with 40 to 60 million people killed in his gulags, etc. These are just massive numbers of people. And it all fits in with their population control agenda.

Climate change is very clearly the latest ploy of the globalists to try and gain control of the world. What do they have to do to solve this problem of climate change? Well, they’ve got to put together a committee there through the UN and they’ve got to come up with a global tax. They need to start taxing all the countries of the earth. And then of course they’ll need to develop standards for who can use how much energy. And then of course, punishments, penalties, if you exceed their limitations and boundaries etc.

You see, this is all about control. This is all about finding a way to get control of the various countries of the earth and the people. These are people obsessed with power and manipulation.

Now this is an article from the National Catholic Register. This is after it was reported about Hans Shelinhuber that he supports population control. An article was published saying,

German climatologist refutes claims he promotes population control.

He apparently came out and denied that that’s what he is promoting. But some interesting things show up in this article. It says German Professor Han Shelinhuber was one of the most influential scientists advising Pope Francis on his encyclical on the environment, LAUDATO SI’ ON CARE FOR OUR COMMON HOME.

As the founder and director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, the climatologist and self-professed atheist was involved from the beginning to the conclusion of Loudato Si’. This is the pope’s encyclical, which is said to be the highest form of papal writing, the Jesuit pope’s encyclical on the environment. And he’s got an atheist who is his chief or one of his chief advisors on this whole thing, who was involved apparently in the development of the whole thing.