Lyndon B. Johnson Complicit with the Vatican and Jesuits in the Murder of JFK
A good friend tells me that it’s the “Synagogue of Satan”, AKA Zionist Jews behind the great satanic antichrist conspiracy of world domination, but my own research points to the Vatican and the Jesuits. I believe the Jews are but front-men and scapegoats for what the Jesuits are doing.
Below is a letter from U.S. Brigadier General Herbert C. Holdridge to Carr Waggoner, Attorney General of the State of Texas, dated November 27th 1963, entitled Complicity of Lyndon B. Johnson In the Murders of John F. Kennedy and Lee Howard Oswald. In the letter Holdridge flat out accused Lyndon Johnson of working with the Jesuits to murder JFK! I got the text from a hard to read PDF file and made it easier for us all to read. You can see the PDF file below to determine if I did it correctly or not.
OF THE UNITED STATES
OPEN LETTER P. O. box 566 • Laguna Beach, California November 27, 1963
TO: Honorable Carron Waggoner, Attorney General, State of Texas
Complicity of Lyndon B. Johnson In the Murders of John F. Kennedy and Lee Howard Oswald
As a postscript to my letter of November 24th concerning Investigation of these two murders, I suggest a careful scrutiny of the complicity of Mr. Lyndon Johnson, now acting as President, In these crimes, within the area of my conclusion that these murders were plotted by Vatican-Jesuit forces. I offer the following additional factors bearing on the situation:
1) Lyndon B. Johnson was a co-conspirator with Kennedy and the forces of the Vatican in the Fraudulent election of 1960, and is equally guilty with Kennedy for every crime committed. He accepted without protest, the Pope’s seditious orders that all Roman Catholics vote for Kennedy; engaged In every political fraud which brought Kennedy to power; was responsible for the mammoth frauds perpetrated In Texas by his own political machine; made the “pilgrimage to Canossa” to yield allegiance to the Pope, invalidating his oath to the Constitution; and after Kennedy’s Inauguration become a willing accessory to every executive crime. Kennedy’s Inauguration being fraudulent, and by adhering to enemies of the United States, treason, Johnson’s Inauguration was Identical, and he is no more a legal President than would have been the lowliest “wino” snatched from Skid Row and hastily sworn in as President.
2) Johnson’s purpose to continue the seditious policies of Kennedy was made plain in his address to Congress: his adherence to the Kennedy policies in Viet Nam, involving the murder of Buddhist monks, and the subsequent murders of Diem and Nhu, all under the Inspiration of the CIA; adherence to support of the Wall Street “Shark“ which has bankrupted the United States, in its raids against the “Sardines” of Latin America, under the guise of an already aborted Alliance For Progress; reliance on H-bomb diplomacy as the ultimate international Instrument; pledge of loyalty to the United Nations, controlled by nations enemies of our Constitution, but not one word spoken of loyalty to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (In the Kennedy precedent in his Inaugural ) – talking out of both sides of his mouth, a very gem of Jesuitical double-talk, undoubtedly written by a Jesuit.
3) Johnson’s crocodile tears over the murder of Kennedy, but not one word of responsible executive purpose to uncover every hidden criminal who helped plot the assassinations, preferring – like the police of Dallas – to announce by silence that the record of Oswald is now closed – and I repeat, “Like Hell it is”.
4) As a long-time Texas politician, acquainted with every political outlaw, and having access to all facts or rumors prior to assassinations, and more surely subsequent thereto, remaining mute though the world shudders at the open knowledge of murder of Oswald to cover for the real criminals, indicating clearly that Johnson possesses guilty knowledge, or is himself a participant In the crime. Had he nothing to conceal he would, himself, have taken the initiative for full investigation.
5) In any murder a compelling question Is: “Who had the most to gain?” The obvious answer is Lyndon B. Johnson, for all his tearful regrets.
6) Participating in the four days of vulgar Vatican ballyhoo, turning a fraud and criminal into a saint, squeezing every ounce of political and clerical advantage out of the cadaver of the dead Kennedy, as had been done during life, including the exploitation of his entire family.
7) Undoubtedly prepared to accept Robert Kennedy as vice-presidential candidate for the 1964 elections, as already hinted, to permit the Pope to play both ends against the middle: accession of John McCormack if Johnson dies (as was predicted along with Kennedy), or Robert Kennedy if Johnson lives, to keep a foot In the crock of the door to perpetuate the fallen Kennedy dynasty.
8) Were the communists involved In these murders, Johnson and the Vatican would have exploded their full propaganda against the USSR. The fact that they have remained mute Indicates that they realize their own involvement, know where the bodies are buried, and rely upon the seditious, falsifying, mobster press controlled by the Vatican and Wall Street, to cover their crimes.
In view of the above I demand that Johnson be questioned under oath, and nit actions subjected to the same thorough investigation demanded of other suspects. The Constitution cannot be defended otherwise.
By Authority Of The Constitution Of The United States:
Herbert C. Holdridge, Brigadier General, US Army (Retired)