The information in this article is something you will never hear from any of your favorite media people such as Tucker Carlson or Megyn Kelly, and you probably won’t hear it from the most famous of the alternative media people. You’ll get it only from researchers who are savvy of both the history of the Protestant Reformation and the Jesuit Roman Catholic Counter Reformation. Please listen to the broadcast or read the text with an open mind, and ask the Lord to show you the truth based on what you read from the Bible about the Fourth Beast of the Book of Daniel chapter 7, and about Babylon the Great of chapters 17-18 of the Book of Revelation.

In the article, Bill Hughes says that all churches signed the BEM document of the World Council of Churches, but I think he must mean all churches that are a member of the World Council of Churches (WCC). Not all churches are WCC members. I don’t see how every single church in the world would sign that document. Most Baptist churches would not sign it because the document states things that are categorically against Baptist doctrines!

Transcription

Tom Friess: Good morning! Welcome to LibertyRadioLive.com. (No longer online.) You’re listening to Inquisition Update on this Thursday, May 27, 2010 edition. And it’s nice to be here with you this morning on this bright, sunny Thursday morning.

And I’m blessed to introduce my returning guest, Bill Hughes, who I look forward to talking to every Thursday, every Thursday morning, and I hope you do too. And he’s author of the book The Enemy Unmasked and The Secret Terrorists, both very informative books, small little pocket-sized books that you can carry with you in your shirt pocket and read and share with friends. I just gave my sister a copy of both of those books the other day, and I’m anxious to see what she has to say about them.

And Bill, if you’re with me this morning, I’ve got now one member of my family who is beginning to comprehend what this is all about. And I have partly you to thank for that, for helping educate me and helping bring me along the understanding of this Vatican-Jesuit-led New World Order. My guest this morning, Bill Hughes.

Bill Hughes: Tom, it’s good to be here. And any praise or credit, Tom, praise God. I’m just so thankful to hear that the books have been a blessing to you, and hopefully they will be to your sister, and we’ll pray to that end that they will be.

Tom Friess: Yes. Thank the Lord, and thank the Lord for Bill Hughes and your dedication to exposing the evil that rules the world, that is exposed in history and in God’s book, helping us to make sense out of the complicated, complex problems that plague the world today. The source of all of it can be found in one man. Amazing, isn’t it?

Bill Hughes: Oh, it is, Tom, indeed. You know, Tom, there’s so many arms to the octopus, but when you start putting some of these things together, as we want to do here this morning, it all starts to just click, Tom, and you begin to realize that there’s a head, there’s a master mind, a worldly power that is running and calling the shots, running the program. But then, Tom, it’s got all of these arms to it, and you start analyzing this stuff, Tom, and you always come across the same people. They always seem to pop up, and whether they’re a part of the Bilderbergers or the Bohemian Grove, or they’re involved in helping communism get started, they were helping Hitler to get going, a part of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Federal Reserve Bank. You know, and you just start connecting all of these dots, Tom, and they all fit together. They all fit together.

Tom Friess: Connecting the dots suddenly begins to paint a recognizable picture, and that’s what’s so stunning about this, that we’ve had the answer. Those of us who read God’s Word have had the answer all along. We just didn’t understand it.

Bill Hughes: Well, you know, Tom, the picture that’s painted in Revelation chapter 17 of this harlot woman, and this harlot woman, Tom, well, of course, the Bible is very clear that a harlot woman represents a false church, and it talks about the fact that this harlot woman or this false church, it commits blasphemy. And throughout Scripture, Tom, whenever, of course, Christ was accused of blasphemy, and blasphemy was claiming to be God on Earth and claiming the power to forgive sins. Now, that’s the biblical definition for blasphemy, and so this world power, this false church, claims that it’s God on Earth and claims that it can forgive sins.

Well, Tom, immediately, immediately, one has to be as challenged by that obvious, simple declaration, and then they must say, well, what false church claims that they are God on Earth and claims they have power to forgive sins? Well, Tom, immediately, you’ve arrived at who this whorish Babylon the Great is in Revelation chapter 17. And a person arrives at the same conclusion that all of the Reformers of the 16th and 17th centuries, they all arrived at the same conclusion, that it was the papacy or the Catholic church system. Then, Tom, as you continue to delve into Revelation 17 and 18, you begin to realize that the kings of the Earth are in unlawful communion with the papacy.

And so you say, well, who are the kings of the Earth? Well, obviously, it’s talking about the political powers, the presidents, the dictators, the prime ministers, the high government officials throughout the world are in cahoots with and are dominated by the Roman Catholic church system. Well, Tom, the ramifications of that are staggering. We’re talking about Barack Obama, the president of the United States. We’re talking about the former prime minister of England, Tony Blair. We’re talking about Saddam Hussein. We’re talking about the leader of North Korea!

These leaders, Tom, are doing the bidding of the Vatican. And then, of course, Tom, you’ve got to look and say, well, where are they heading with all this? Where is it going to end up? And then you start analyzing some of the encyclicals of Benedict and of John Paul. Then you start filling in more pieces of the puzzle.

Another thing, Tom, that Revelation 17 and 18 brings us is not only the political leaders of earth that are under the control of the Vatican, but then you come to Revelation 18, and it talks about the merchants of the earth, Revelation 18, 11 to 15. Well, Tom, it describes what the merchants do. It says they buy and sell wood and all manner of vessels of ivory and wheat and sheep and goats and slaves. And, you know, Tom, obviously we’re looking at the great wealthy people of our world, the men that control the international banking systems, the great businessmen of the earth that control so much of the world’s commodities and so much of the world’s goods. And, Tom, it says that those merchants were made rich because they were connected to Babylon the Great, the Vatican.

Well, Tom, again, consider the ramifications of that simple little awareness. We’re talking about the Rothschilds. We’re talking about the Rockefellers, the Morgans, the Waltons, the Stevens, the Drexels, the Stanfords. All of these people, Tom, are using their wealth, Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch, and the list goes on and on and on, that these men, Tom, are working with the papacy to bring about what the papacy wants in this world.

And, Tom, it’s just staggering. These wealthy men, they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, and they’re telling the world what to believe. And, of course, Tom, they’re lying by the skin of their teeth.

Then, finally, Tom, you’ve got the churches. Revelation 17.5 says that Babylon the Great is the mother of many little harlot daughters that do exactly what she tells them.

Tom Friess: Of all the things that are revealed in the Scriptures to me about this New World Order that I now comprehend, I think the most horrifying realization for me was discovering who those harlot daughters were. It’s painful, Bill, to realize that God’s people, the very elect of God, unbeknownst to them, wittingly and unwittingly, are serving the papacy.

And it’s unbelievable to me. I mean, you’d think that after 10 years of doing day and night research into this, that I could finally learn to be able to speak this passionately. But it’s difficult, I’m telling you, to understand how they’ve corrupted our churches with false doctrines and got us to believe a lie that plays right into their global New World Order hands, this entire ecumenical movement, and what influence Vatican Council II had on the Protestant churches, and how our Protestant churches have forgotten the singularity, the single piece of knowledge that fomented the Protestant Reformation in the very beginning, and how that’s been lost to us, how we’ve forgotten that the Protestant Reformers left the Roman Catholic Church because they realized that the Church of Rome was the synagogue of Satan and that the Pope was Antichrist himself. How could Satan have stripped us of that knowledge? How could we be so spiritually lethargic and scripturally inept and historically bereft of knowledge that we could lose the key to understanding so much of the Word of God is just staggering to me.

Bill Hughes: Oh, it is, Tom. It is. But, you know, Tom, let’s face it. Unless we are earnest and diligent and alert and clear thinking as to what’s going on, Tom, we can all get caught in the web and get turned aside. And, tragically, let’s face it, Tom. Back in 1981, 1982, right there in Lima, Peru, the World Council of Churches, Tom, that included every church throughout the world, every church. And they all signed the BEM document. (Baptism, Eucharist and, also known as the Lima Document, is an ecumenical document adopted by members of the World Council of Churches in Lima in January 1982.- Source:Wikipedia) If you’ve ever wondered, since the early 1980s, why churches, when you look at church marquees, they’ll have these three wavy lines out on their marquee. Well, Tom, that was the symbol that came out of the Lima, Peru, World Council of Church meetings back in the early 80s.

Logo of the World Council of Churches

Tom Friess: Oh, interesting. I wasn’t aware of that. But that’s a common logo on the marquees of churches that are signatories to this?

Bill Hughes: Absolutely, Tom. It’s funny, Tom. I can go through central Florida, and I can find anywhere between a half a dozen to a dozen different churches, and they all have on their marquees this little representation. It looks like three wavy lines or three torches of fire. But that came, Tom, straight from the BEM document. And in that document, Tom, all of the churches that signed it, and all churches did.

They all agreed the B represents baptism, meaning that people, and they all agreed that a person can be baptized in any way, shape, or form that they jolly well choose. It doesn’t make any difference how old they are. They can be babies. They can be ready to go in the grave and not have a clue what they’re doing, but they can be baptized. They can be sprinkled. It makes no difference. Well, Tom, millions…

Tom Friess: That’s Catholicism.

Bill Hughes: Absolutely. And millions, millions of people were killed in the 16th and 17th centuries because they said that baptism must be by immersion, and it must be done by somebody who understands what they’re doing.

Well, Tom, how any church could sign that document is just unfathomable. The E, Tom, in the document for you…

Tom Friess: Don’t tell me. Let me guess. Eucharist, right?

Bill Hughes: That’s right, Tom. How any Protestant church, any Protestant church could sign that.

Tom Friess: That’s inconceivable to me. That’s inconceivable. And I talk about this stuff on amateur radio. Tom, what is the Eucharist? You talk about the Eucharist. And I’m stunned at the number of people that don’t have a clue what the Eucharist is. It’s another sacrifice. It’s another Savior, and it’s another gospel. It is a total repudiation of Christ. Anyone who thinks that they need to make another sacrifice to receive grace from God has repudiated Christ, and that’s what the Eucharist is.

I had one of my regular participants in my amateur radio discussion ask me about the Eucharist, and I spent about a half an hour telling him everything I knew about it. And only a few, when I tell them this, understand the spiritual significance of it. They don’t comprehend what’s the difference, I mean, between the Eucharist, even after I explain it. It’s no big deal to them. They don’t comprehend. Bill, just take some time, if you want to, and speak to my listeners about the Eucharist. What an abomination it is.

Bill Hughes: Tom, in a nutshell, it’s a priest. It’s a human being made from the dust of the ground, Tom, who is blasphemously claiming that they are actually creating the Creator in the Mass, in the wafer, that the priest is so powerful and so mighty that he is actually creating Christ in that wafer.

It’s beyond abomination. It’s beyond abomination. And then, of course, with the juice, you have, when the priest lifts up his cup, he actually believes that he has literally turned that juice or that wine into the actual blood of Jesus Christ.

Tom Friess: Now, many of my listeners have never heard the term transubstantiation before, but this is the act of changing the substance of the bread and wine into the literal blood, body, soul, and divinity of Christ, the whole Christ, nothing lacking, to be sacrificed again on the altar of the Roman Catholic churches. It’s called the Mass. The priest has some kind of hocus-pocus ability.

After saying four or five magic Latin words, hoc est inim corpus meum, that wheat flour wafer literally, without changing its appearance, is 100% changed in substance, and it is Christ’s body, his literal body, blood, body, soul, and divinity.

And the Mass is just another sacrifice. It’s a perpetual sacrifice. That’s what is taught in the Roman Catholic church. And when that Eucharist, that consecrated piece of bread that has been changed or transubstantiated, its substance has been changed from wheat flour bread to the Christ, then they parade it around in a gold-plated sunburst fixture they call the monstrance. And it must be worshipped as Christ, because in the Roman Catholic church it is Christ, whole and entire.

And this abomination is inconceivable to people. It is to me, and I dare say how difficult it is, unless someone who is familiar with the finished work of Christ, to comprehend what an abomination it is. And I’m afraid that what is revealed in this is just how lacking our understanding is of the finished work of Christ on the cross. That’s the tragedy in my heart that I just feel every time I talk about this.

Bill Hughes: Well, the fact, Tom, that it’s been hoisted onto Protestantism and it’s been embraced, it’s just a heartbreak, Tom. It’s an absolute heartbreak.

But the M part in that document, Tom, is called ministry. And what it says is that within ministry we can reach out to people that have left our church, you know, and try to win them back. But as far as doing evangelism throughout the world, we can’t do that. And, Tom, our message is to go to the whole world. And it’s not to be isolated and said just for a part of the people or just for people that are in our church. But we’re supposed to preach the truth to every nation, to every kindred, to every tongue, and to every person.

But this BEM document, Tom, it’s just diabolical. It’s diabolical. And the fact that the churches of the world find it is just nothing short of a tragedy, just an absolute tragedy with incredible proportions.

Tom Friess: Ministry has been redefined by the Vatican to not be evangelization or the spreading of the gospel. But ministry now is social projects, you know, global warming, feeding the hungry, which is a charitable thing. But the total emphasis on ministry is based on the Pope’s global agenda. And part of that ministry is the redistribution of wealth and the taking from rich Protestant nations and giving to underprivileged third world, usually Catholic nations or pagan or heathen nations.

And since that document came out, I’ve learned a lot more about the ministry segment of this abomination called BEM. And the gospel is completely lacking. Doctrine is completely lacking. Evangelization is completely lacking.

Bill Hughes: Absolutely, Tom. No question about it. No question. Tom, for the next half hour here with what we have left, I’d like to go into one of the groups that the papacy is using, that the Jesuit order has been using for the last nearly hundred years. And I’d like to take a look at that. It’s the CFR.

Tom Friess: That’s an excellent idea. Let’s show the people the facts on the ground, the militia of the papacy and what organizations they comprise and how they function in the world to bring about this Vatican Jesuit led New World Order. The Council on Foreign Relations figures large in this. And if you can bring to my listeners more understanding about the Council on Foreign Relations, then I’m anxious to hear it.

Bill Hughes: Tom, the thing that I’ve been looking at here lately, you know, so few people, Tom, have any clue that the papacy is running things. I was talking with a guy on an interview here just the other day, and he said,

“Oh, that’s impossible! There’s no connection between the Jesuit order and the Catholic Church with what’s going on in America. That’s impossible.”

Well, I’ve been doing some research, Tom, for quite a while on this, obviously. And I want to go back and look with the listeners as to the rise of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations. I have been shocked, Tom, to find out that, well, let me just go through a little bit here.

From 1952 right up to our current day, I want you to notice something. Adlai Stevenson was a Democrat that ran in 1952 and 1956, and he challenged Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower for the presidency both times. Eisenhower won both elections. Both of those men were members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1960, John F. Kennedy ran against Richard Nixon. Both of them were members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1964, Lyndon Johnson and his opponent, Barry Goldwater, neither of them were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. But it’s clear that Lyndon Johnson, who was elected in 1964, had already staffed his administration with many people who were members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

1968, Richard Nixon ran against Hubert Humphrey. Both Republican Nixon and Democrat Humphrey were members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1972, Richard Nixon ran against the Democratic Party member George McGovern. George McGovern and Nixon were both members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1976, the Republican person who ran for the presidency was Gerald Ford. Gerald Ford was a member of the CFR. His Democratic opponent, who won the election in 1976, was Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan ran against Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter, of course, was a member of the CFR. So was an independent man who also ran in that election, a man by the name of John Anderson.

Now, Ronald Reagan was not a CFR member, but his running mate, George Bush, was. And right after Ronald Reagan came into office, he quickly named 313 members to his team who were all members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1984, Walter Mondale was nominated by the Democratic Party to challenge Reagan. Walter Mondale was a member of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations.

In 1988, George Bush went against a Democrat by the name of Michael Dukakis. George Bush, of course, as we already noted, was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Michael Dukakis, who was a Democrat that year, was also a member of the CFR.

In 1992, George Bush ran again on the Republican ticket. He is a CFR member. He ran against a little-known obscure governor from Arkansas by the name of Bill Clinton. Now, Bill Clinton was not only a member of the CFR, but also the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberger Group.

In 1996, Clinton ran again. He was a CFR member. He was challenged on the Republican ticket by Bob Dole. Bob Dole is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

In the year 2000, Al Gore ran. He was a CFR member. He ran against George Bush, the son. George Bush was not a member of the CFR. However, his running mate, Dick Cheney, was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Tom Friess: That’s something that he kept secret from his local constituents back home, too, that he admitted. He admitted keeping secret.

Bill Hughes: In 2004, Bush, going on the Republican ticket, not a member of the CFR. He was challenged by CFR member John Kerry. Now, it’s interesting, Tom, and this gets into a whole other discussion, but both Bush and Kerry, who ran in 2004, were members of the Order of Skull and Bones from Yale University.

In 2008, Barack Obama and John McCain ran against each other. Both of these men are members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Now, Tom, for the last 58 years, almost without interruption, the Council on Foreign Relations has controlled the White House of the United States. If they haven’t controlled the actual president, they have had so many people in high positions, whether it be the vice president or in the cabinet, just so many members, Tom, that to say anything short of the fact that the Council on Foreign Relations has dominated the political landscape of the United States for the last 50-odd years, at least, that would be absolutely true.

Now, it’s also true, Tom, that other people, let me just give you an example of a few other people who are members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, of course, Obama and McCain, John Edwards, Joseph Biden, Christopher Dodd. Now, it’s interesting, Mike Huckabee spoke to the CFR in September, and since then he has risen to a point to where he looks to be a top-tier candidate in future political elections.

So the CFR, Tom, has had an incredible, an incredible influence on the politics, on the foreign policy, on the domestic policies of the United States for the last 50~60 odd years.

With that in mind, Tom, I think it behooves us to find out all we can about the Council on Foreign Relations. Where did it come from? Who started it? What are their goals? I want to read a statement to you from a book called The Secret Side of History by D. Zanner. It says,

To guard against exposure, and to mold public opinion, powerful men in America working on world government set out to control the news media. They accomplished this by appointing 12 leading men in the newspaper field to found out what was necessary to control the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. It was decided this could be accomplished by purchasing control of the 25 greatest [news]papers.

While the Council on Foreign Relations was working to remake the world for the first 35 years of its existence, no feature article about it appeared in the news media.

It was not until the 1960s that this near-total control of the media began to be circumvented. For decades, many top officials of the United States government had been members of the Council on Foreign Relations. This includes presidents, 14 secretaries of state, 14 treasury secretaries, 11 defense secretaries, and scores of other federal department heads.

Tom Friess: Well, I’ll tell you something. Not long ago, I came across a video on Google of David Rockefeller, Council on Foreign Relations, Knight of Malta, standing in front of a huge group at a Council on Foreign Relations meeting, telling about this New World Order that they’ve created, and that they couldn’t have done it without the cooperation of the press. He publicly, at a meeting, congratulated and thanked the press for cooperating in order to help bring this to pass.

Do you have that quote right in front of you? I wish I had that quote in front of me. I’d read it verbatim, what he said to the press.

Bill Hughes: Tom, I don’t have it in front of me. However, I do have a statement here that says that the financing of not only the newspapers, but the financing for the Council on Foreign Relations itself came from J.P. Morgan, the Rockefeller family, Jacob Schiff. They were the prime movers in providing the money, not only to control the papers.

See, Tom, when Rockefeller thanks the media, they didn’t have any choice, Tom. It was either print what we tell you to print, write what we tell you to write, or you’re gone.

Tom Friess: Yeah, they just simply bust them financially, and they would have lost their businesses had they not cooperated.

Bill Hughes: Exactly. Now, Tom, where did this Council on Foreign Relations begin? When was it first created? Where was it created? Who created it? And then we’ll analyze what the purpose was behind it.

A little background: Toward the end of World War I, Woodrow Wilson, who was then the President of the United States, was trying to figure out what they were going to do following the war, what would be done. Well, in 1917, 1918, there was an academic board that included Woodrow Wilson’s closest advisor and longtime friend, a man by the name of Edward Mandell House. Well, Edward Mandell House and this group of academics, they got together, and they were analyzing the political, economic, and social facts globally that would be helpful for Wilson in the peace talks. So the CFR, Tom, came into existence out of this little academic band of men who were advising Woodrow Wilson. And so the CFR was actually created right towards the end of World War I. Actually, right around 1920, the CFR was officially created.

Now, this man, Edward Mandell House, he was the prime mover in the creating of the CFR. Just a few quotes here. And again, Tom, you start to connect the dots, and they all start to fit together. Everything pieces together into this perfect puzzle. From the book by G. Edward Griffin called The Creature from Jekyll Island, Griffin says,

Well, right there, Tom, you see Edward Mandell House, the creation of the Council on Foreign Relations, and lo and behold, J.P. Morgan shows up.

Now, when Edward Griffin refers to the old banking families of Europe, which specific old banking family of Europe was the, what would we say, the cream of the crop? Which one was the one that would always rise to the top and had such control over the banking systems of Europe?

Tom Friess: The Rothschild banking dynasty, Freemasons, and I also understand from the book Rulers of Evil by F. Tupper Saussy, on page 160, it talks about he knew that they were a Jewish family, and so he looked them up in the Encyclopedia Judaica, and in the Encyclopedia Judaica, under Rothschild, it is said that they are the guardians of the Vatican treasury.

Bill Hughes: Absolutely, Tom. What we have is you start with the Council on Foreign Relations. The man who started it was Edward Mandell House. The people who financed Edward Mandell House in the creation of the Council on Foreign Relations were the Morgans, the Rockefellers, and the Rothschilds.

Tom Friess: And we had to believe that those same families were interested in the creation of the Council on Foreign Relations for a specific purpose, too.

Bill Hughes: Absolutely, Tom. Then, as you just stated from F. Tupper Saussy’s book Rulers of Evil and his quote from the Encyclopedia Judaica, you then take it one more step back. Most people, Tom, you know, when we start talking about conspiracy, and this is what the CFR is all about, it’s a conspiracy. Most people, Tom, like to take you back and say, okay, it’s the Rothschilds, the international Jewish banking families, that’s where everything stops. But the Encyclopedia Judaica takes it back one more step. The quote from F. Tupper Saussy,

So, Tom, right there you start connecting the dots. You go CFR, Edward Mandell House. Edward Mandell House, Rockefeller’s, Morgan’s, Rothschilds. Rockefeller’s, Morgan’s, Rothschilds, the Jesuit order, and the Catholic Church.

Tom Friess: And if you care to go back even further than that, from the Jesuits, you go back to the Knights Templar. But that might be another discussion. But it’s the Roman Catholic, it’s the financial heritage of the Roman Catholic Church. That’s what this is all about. It’s Roman Catholic Vatican money that has financed the Council on Foreign Relations. And if you don’t think the Council on Foreign Relations, I’m speaking to my listeners, if you don’t think the Council on Foreign Relations is important to the Vatican, you’re not doing the math.

Bill Hughes: Not at all, Tom. You know, Tom, here’s a statement that I make in my book, The Enemy Unmasked, page 80 and 81. It was Edward Mandell House, under the watchful eye of Jacob Schiff, who was under the watchful eye of the head of this international conspiracy, that established in 1921 what their earlier comrades established over through the governments of France and Russia, called the Jacobin Clubs in France in the 18th century. This aristocratic revolutionary movement today in America is called the Council on Foreign Relations. Its offshoot is the Trilateral Commission.

The Council on Foreign Relations is the political side of the Illuminati today. They have produced congressmen, senators, presidents. They’ve used them to pass laws that have little by little led America into becoming a socialist country. Tom, that is exactly what is happening today.

From Eric Phelps’ book, Vatican Assassins, he says, the agents of the Jesuits created the Council on Foreign Relations. You know, a lot of people down what Eric Phelps says, Tom, in his book Vatican Assassins, but this statement right here, he is saying exactly what we have just said by connecting the dots.

The locations would be in the two most powerful Roman Catholic dioceses in the American Empire, New York and Chicago. The CFR would control the Empire’s finance, government, industry, religion, education, and press. No one could be elected to the presidency of the United States without the Council’s consent, as the office would be a tool for the Archbishop of New York to subject to the vicar of Christ in Rome.

And then it says, one of the founders of the CFR also aided in the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank. He was the holy monk and agent of the Jesuit general. His name, Edward Mandell House. Tom, you have all of these things that are connected, and you have, in every case, the hands are always the same. It’s Edward Mandell House, it’s the Rockefellers, it’s the Morgans, it’s the Rothschilds, it’s the Titanic, it’s the Federal Reserve Bank, it’s the Council on Foreign Relations, it’s the Federal Income Tax Act. You know, Tom, it goes on and on and on. Just by connecting the dots, we can see how it all is tied together.

Tom Friess: Well, Bill, you’ve mentioned all the popular names and all the popular organizations that are talked about in all the alternative media. Let’s just name them. Alex Jones, Stanley Monteith, Glenn Beck. You’ve probably got a list as long as my arm of people that talk about all of these organizations. But they only go back so far. Some of them are talking about Edward Mandell House, but they never take him back to the Jesuits. They never take it back all the way to the Roman Catholic Church. They’re protecting the Jesuits and the Roman Catholic Church.

And I spent four days Thursday, last Thursday, with you on the broadcast, and I worked on it Friday and Monday and Tuesday and Wednesday on this broadcast, telling the truth about Glenn Beck’s program that he aired on the 18th, showing the listeners what he failed to mention. And it’s stunning how these people can get so close and yet so far from the truth.

We have to understand that the Bible told us about the final kingdom that would rule the world in Daniel chapter 2. It’s Daniel’s vision. It started with Babylon, then Medo-Persia, then Greece, and then Rome. There’s not a fifth. Why does no one ever talk about Rome? Why does no one ever talk about the Jesuit order? Why do the most powerful and prominent and wealthy names in the media and the alternative media get by with not talking about Rome? God’s people ought to know all about Rome.

The Protestant Reformers knew all about Rome. Why are we so ignorant today? It’s because of these people that gobble up all the airtime. Alex Jones, Stan Monteith, Glenn Beck, on and on and on. They gobble up all the airtime, they get all the attention, and they leave out the jack of all trades: The Jesuit order and the Roman Catholic Church, the papacy, and the Vatican. And Bill Hughes makes that connection in terms that anyone can understand.

And that’s why I want my listeners to pay particular attention to Bill Hughes when he comes on as my guest on this program. I want to thank you, Bill, for joining with me today. I’m looking forward again next time.

Download a PDF file of this article.

Please follow and like us: