HomeEschatologyThe Danger of Belief in a Pre-Tribulation Rapture

Comments

The Danger of Belief in a Pre-Tribulation Rapture — 4 Comments

  1. The Bible clearly teaches no one can know the day of the Lord.If then the day of the Lord is the rapture one can know exactly when the second phase of His coming will accur.We know the Bible doesn’t teach that at all.There are major deceptions in believing this.Again we as His children are warned over and over again “be not deceived , let no man deceive you.” We must study the Bible ourself and find out if other people’s teachings is according to the Bible.When we look at the Bible we see history.God’s Word stops in Revelation but the history of His church continue until today.

  2. Thank you James, I do agree with this article, though I am a little dismayed at seeing Steve Gregg being quoted to support your conclusions. Steve’s views on the book of Revelation continue to trouble me. He takes the Idealist view mixed with a partial Preterist stance.

    In addition, he makes a caricature of the Historicist view which he claims was mostly discredited by the Millerites. After discussing the failure of Historicism, he says that one’s view of Revelation is just not that important in the grand scheme of things. What difference does it make in one’s salvation? Just follow Jesus.

    His position, it seems to me, undermines the central theme of all your hard work. In the end, not only futurism, but preterism and idealism appear to be designed to deflect attention away from identifying the Papacy as the seat of Antichist, not to mention the severe consequences coming in to play from the political activity of “Christian” Zionism.

    • Ron, of course you know I promote the Historicist view of interpretation of the Book of Revelation, and therefore I do not agree with Steve Gregg on this point. But nobody’s perfect, right? It was his talk about the dangers of dispensationalism that inspired my article. His commentary of Matthew 24 is also great in my opinion. This morning I heard him say something like, “Jerusalem compassed with armies” in Luke 21:20 is a paraphrase of “the abomination of desolation ” in Matthew 24:15 & Mark 13:14. That’s why Luke doesn’t need to say, “whoso readeth, let him understand” because he makes it crystal clear exactly what the abomination of desolation of Daniel 9:27 is.” I think it’s great! I never heard it put that way before that “Jerusalem compassed with armies” in Luke 21:20 is a paraphrase of “the abomination of desolation ” in Matthew 24:15 & Mark 13:14. I think that’s something powerful to share. I told the same thing in other words to my dispensational friends and they just didn’t get it!

      I felt I should use quote from Steve Gregg because I couldn’t say what he said any better, and I don’t want to be accused of plagiarism. Anything anybody wrote that I like and feel it could benefit the body of Christ, I attribute authorship to that person. I don’t follow one person entirely in everything excluding all others. We should search the scriptures like the Bereans to see if what the preacher is saying is right or not. Just because a preacher is wrong in one thing, does it hurt my credibility to quote him in the good things he says?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

James Japan