Let me start this article with a quote from Marcus Tullius Cicero. He lived from January 3, 106 BC to December 7, 43 BC and was a Roman statesman, lawyer, scholar, philosopher, and writer.

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes. When you see emphasis with “(emphasis added)” following, they’re the author’s emphasis. In places where you see emphasis without “(emphasis added)” following, they are my emphasis.

CHAPTER 10
DESTRUCTION IN OKLAHOMA CITY

Explosions demolished the Alfred E. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995. 168 Americans died as a result, including a number of little children attending a day-care center housed in the building. The United States government has declared and steadfastly maintains that it was a fertilizer bomb, inside a Ryder truck parked in front of the building that caused the damage. We have seen in previous chapters that in tragic situations like this, what the government claims happened is totally unbelievable.

Benton K. Partin, a retired Brigadier General and 31 year veteran of the United States Air Force, is a premiere expert on explosives. He served as commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Lab, and was responsible for munitions development for the armed services. He is a recognized expert as a major guiding force of our modern, precision, guided, weapons systems.

General Partin did an extensive analysis of the bombing of the Murrah Building. In his report, he declares,

Thus, we see that it was impossible for the truck bomb to have destroyed the Murrah Building. Other bombs were strategically placed at the bottoms of the structural columns to do the damage that was done. Somebody who had access to the Murrah Building, who knew where the reinforced structural columns were, who had access to the building plans, placed the bombs that destroyed the building.

News reporters on the scene shortly after the building collapsed reported that workers were removing bombs that did not go off from within the building.

The bombs that did explode did not explode simultaneously. The bomb blasts were recorded on two seismometers, one at the Omniplex Museum, 4.34 miles northeast of the Building, and the other at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, 16.25 miles to the southeast. Both of these seismometers recorded two separate, closely spaced explosions of approximately equal intensity.

Also, several highly credible witnesses reported hearing separate explosions. Shortly after the explosions, the bomb squad defused one unexploded bomb inside the building, and were working on a second.

There is an emerging pattern here. When President Kennedy was killed, it was declared that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, had committed the crime. As we saw in chapter eight, there is a tremendous amount of evidence that proves there were several gunmen. Lee Harvey Oswald took the rap, and many others went free.

When the Murrah Building blew up, it was declared that one man was primarily responsible, Timothy McVeigh. But Benton Partin, a military explosives expert, showed that it was impossible for the truck bomb to have done the damage. Others had access to the building plans and planted explosives around the columns. They were guiltier than McVeigh, but they went free. Who were the people really responsible for the Oklahoma City tragedy?

During a live-feed video interview, an Assistant Fire Chief on the scene stated that the bomb squad was at the Murrah building at seven clock that morning, two hours before the bombing took place. What were they doing there two hours before the bombing?

Immediately after the explosions, Mayor Ron Nordick, Dr. Randall Heather, Governor Frank Keating, and numerous news anchors stated that the FBI and the ATF had confirmed that high explosive bombs were taken out of the building. Now, the official story is that it was a fertilizer bomb. Were the governor, the mayor and the news anchors lying, or were they just not briefed in time for everyone to get their stories straight?

This is amazing. A United States government agency, that had offices in the building, did not report to work that day or bring their children to the daycare center. Do you suppose they knew what was going to happen to the building?

On a radio talk show ten days after the bombing,

In light of all the evidence, this is the only story that makes sense. As in the case of Kennedy’s murder, so it is in the Oklahoma City bombing. High-level agents of the U.S. government, claiming to love America and our freedom, were serving another master, carrying out his purposes. As we will see, there was a distinct purpose for the Oklahoma City bombing. How sickening that so many lives were lost to answer the call of the papacy!

Like JFK, Waco, and the World Trade Center, the Oklahoma City bombing leaves a great many questions that demand answers, but none have been given. Consider some of these questions.

1. Why was U.S. Judge Wayne Alley, whose office was located in the Federal building, warned several weeks in advance in a Justice Department memo to be prepared for an unnamed terrorist act directed against the federal building?

2. Why did the director of the University of Oklahoma’s geological survey, Dr. Charles Mankin, tell the media that according to two different seismographic records, there were two blasts?

3. Why has the information of Benton K. Partin not come to the light of day?

4. Why did the Clinton administration blame right wing radio talk shows for the incident, and demand the most draconian police state legislation ever proposed in the United States so quickly after the blasts? This proposed legislation was so well organized that it was obvious it had been prepared long before the destruction of the building.

5. Why was a blizzard of domestic terrorism bills rushed into Congress in a matter of days after the bombing? These laws include the banning of virtually all privately owned firearms. Remember Waco?

There were liberty-restricting measures in Congress just prior to the Oklahoma City bombing that were stalled. Right after the bombing they were immediately passed.

The purpose of the Oklahoma City bombing was to get Congress to pass the anti-terrorism bill without debate. If a debate had taken place, the issues of constitutional liberties and the creation of a police state would have been raised. The Jesuits in Congress prefer that the police state be implemented without the public noticing by creating a climate of national hysteria using a staged terrorist attack. The bill sailed through with no debate or discussion.

One of the laws considered for passage after the Oklahoma City bombing was the gross destruction of the First Amendment advocated in Charles Schumer’s bill, HR 2580. In this bill, a five-year prison sentence would be given for publicly engaging in unseemly speculation and publishing or transmitting by wire or electronic means baseless conspiracy theories regarding the federal government of the United States.

We have seen that in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing, several liberty-restricting laws were passed by Congress very quickly. The bombing created a climate of fear in America. In this setting, laws passed with few dissenting voices. In the midst of the hysteria, the unconstitutional laws could be quickly passed. The people want comfort and security, and they did not object to the passing of these laws. These laws seriously eroded the constitutional liberties that have been the cornerstone of American prosperity for over 200 years. It is amazing how quickly a normally slow and cumbersome Congress can act when the agenda is all set.

A conditioning program got well under way after the Oklahoma City bombing. How many freedoms would Americans give away in order to feel safe? Do we not see that the powers running our government want to destroy the Constitution?

People do not realize that governmental power is extremely dangerous. Down through history, peoples’ worst enemy has been their own government. When constitutional freedoms are gone, there is nothing to restrict government from doing anything it wants, and deadly governmental persecution is the result.

Americans just don’t realize that as they give up their freedoms they are not increasing their security, but decreasing it. They are putting themselves at high risk for governmental persecution. Already the government confiscates many hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of personal property each year without a trial. Already human life is not considered sacred anymore. Remember Waco?

America would not be such a prominent terrorist target if the government did not make itself so obnoxious to nearly every country in the world. One hundred years ago, the people of the world loved Americans and wanted Americans to visit their countries. That certainly is not the case anymore.

In this article, Brent Scowcroft, former national security adviser said, “It’s so easy to do; it takes so few people; the materials are so readily available. But to counter it is so expensive in dollars and, more importantly, in civil liberties.”

Is it clear that terror was used, and is still being used, to condition Americans to give up their constitutional liberties? It was used successfully at Waco, Oklahoma City, and the World Trade Center. Doesn’t it make you wonder what will be next? (The Covid-19 pandamic.)

Who is behind the scenes leading “American” politicians to destroy civil liberty in America? Who has despised and hated our liberties for over 200 years? Who hates liberty so much that they eliminate people who stand in their way like pawns in a chess game?

One of the popes stated,

The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of liberty of conscience are a most pestilential error — a pest, of all others, most to be dreaded in a state. — Pope Pius IX, Encyclical Letter, August 15th, 1854.

Liberty of conscience is thoroughly detested by the papacy. Liberty of conscience is guaranteed ONLY in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights.

In 1864, in his encyclical letter, Pius IX anathematized “those who assert liberty of conscience and of religious worship.” (Pope Pius IX, Encyclical Letter, December 8, 1864.) He is saying that anybody who believes that a person is entitled to freedom to worship God according to the dictates of their own conscience, should be anathematized. To anathematize somebody is too confine them to hell; to consider them to be a heretic worthy of damnation. In Pius’ mind, the Constitution should burn in hell and anyone who loves it should be burned too.

British Broadcasting journalist Avro Manhattan reported:

In the preface to Samuel B. Morse’s great book, it is written,

Samuel B. Morse and the man who wrote the preface to his great work understood that the Jesuits and the Holy Alliance were committed to destroying the freedoms of this great Republic of the United States of America.

A former priest has written,

William Jefferson Clinton, who attended Georgetown University, which is the Jesuit college in Washington, D.C. pushed Congress to pass the anti-terrorism bill that was to be a direct assault on the liberties that we enjoy as Americans. The Oklahoma City bombing was planned, carried out, and fully known by the Jesuits, the government of the United States, and by the president. The secret players behind them all, who have wanted to destroy the liberties of this great Republic for the last 200 plus years are the Jesuits of the Roman Catholic Church.

They have wanted to put an end to the laws that guarantee our liberties as United States citizens. In order to bring that about, they carried out the greatest terrorist bombing on U.S. soil, and in U.S. history before the World Trade Center, when they did it again.

More attacks will come. Freedoms will be attacked again and liberty will be taken away. The Jesuits will continue to use many so-called “American” politicians, who are an integral part of the conspiracy of the papacy to totally demolish the Constitution and this great Republic. They are conditioning America and preparing the people for the inevitable takeover.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes. When you see emphasis with “(emphasis added)” following, they’re the author’s emphasis. In places where you see emphasis without “(emphasis added)” following, they are my emphasis.

Most Americans know the Abraham Lincoln, was assassinated, but not many know the assassination was planned by the soldiers of the Roman Catholic Church, the Jesuits. And I think still less know that also Vice President Andrew Johnson, Secretary of State William Seward, and Civil War General Ulysses S. Grant were also targets of assassination by the Jesuits! This article will give you lots of insights you won’t get from worldly academic institutions.

CHAPTER 4
PRESIDENT ABRAHAM LINCOLN

In 1856, a runaway slave named Dred Scott had sought to gain freedom in the free state of Kansas. The case was so important that it went all the way to the Supreme Court. The infamous Dred Scott Decision was rendered by the fanatical Roman Catholic Judge Taney, the Chief Justice of the United States at that time. The Taney Decision, in a nutshell, was that the Negro had no rights that the white man had to respect. This basically said that the black man was inferior to the white man and had no rights. Abraham Lincoln as a child had watched the selling of young black men and women in a small Illinois town. As he and a friend walked past a slave auction, Lincoln turned to his friend and said, “Some day, I am going to hit it hard!”

In November of 1855, Charles Chiniquy, a Catholic priest of Kankakee, Illinois, had been attacked in a series of court cases by the Bishop of the Chicago Diocese. Chiniquy had spoken often on the subject of temperance and the evils of liquor. Since many of the priests were alcoholics, and most of the others were social drinkers, Chiniquy’s talks on temperance were not appreciated. Chiniquy often quoted the Bible in defense of certain positions he held. This greatly inflamed the Catholic bishop of Chicago against him. In order to silence him, Chiniquy was framed, being accused by an immoral priest’s female relative of misconduct towards her.

Charles Chiniquy’s case had been so publicized in the Illinois c press that very few lawyers wanted to defend him. They realized that they were not just fighting against a priest in Chicago; they were fighting against the Roman Catholic Church. Charles Chiniquy learned of Abe Lincoln, a very loyal and upright lawyer in Illinois. Chiniquy sent Lincoln a wire asking for his services and within twenty minutes of Chiniquy’s wire, he got a reply that said, “Yes, I will defend your life and your honor at the next May term of the Court at Urbana. Signed A. Lincoln.”

Chiniquy relates,

The time arrived when the Sheriff of Kankakee had to drag me again as a criminal and a prisoner to Urbana, and deliver me into the hands of the sheriff of that city. I arrived there on the 20th of October with my lawyers, Messrs. Osgood and Paddock, and a dozen witnesses. Mr. Abraham Lincoln had preceded me only by a few minutes from Springfield. — Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chick Publications, p. 273.

When Charles Chiniquy was defended by Abraham Lincoln, we read,

He then went on and depicted the career of Father Chiniquy, how he had been unjustly persecuted and in conclusion said, “As long as God gives me a heart to feel, a brain to think, or a hand to execute my will, I shall devote it against that power which has attempted to use the machinery of the courts to destroy the rights and character of an American citizen.” And this promise made by Abraham Lincoln in his maturer years he also kept. — Burke McCarty, The Suppressed Truth about the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, Arya Varta Publishing, p. 41.

Lincoln realized that Chiniquy had been unjustly accused. The night before Chiniquy was to be condemned to prison for a crime he did not commit, an eye witness, who had overheard the plot to destroy Chiniquy, came forward and he was saved.

Abraham Lincoln made a lot of enemies as a result of the Chiniquy trial. As they left the courtroom, Charles Chiniquy was in tears. Abraham Lincoln asked him,

Father Chiniquy, what are you crying for? “Dear Mr. Lincoln,” I answered, “allow me to tell you that the joy I should naturally feel for such a victory is destroyed in my mind by the fear of what it may cost you. There were in the court not less than ten or twelve Jesuits from Chicago and St. Louis, who came to hear my sentence of condemnation to the penitentiary……What troubles my soul just now and draws my tears, is that it seems to me that I have read your sentence of death in their fiendish eyes. How many other noble victims have already fallen at their feet!” — Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, p. 280, 281.

Abraham Lincoln, as far back as 1855 and 1856, was already a marked man that Rome sought to destroy. Four years later, in 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States. As he made his way from Illinois to Washington, D. C., he had to pass through the city of Baltimore. He later said to Charles Chiniquy,

I am so glad to meet you again. . . . You see that your friends, the Jesuits, have not yet killed me. But they would have surely done it when I passed through their most devoted city, Baltimore, had I not passed by incognito a few hours before they expected me. We have proof that the company which had been selected and organized to murder me was led by a rabid Roman Catholic called Byrne; it was almost entirely composed of Roman Catholics; more than that, there were two disguised priests among them, to lead and encourage them…. I saw Mr. Morse, the learned inventor of electric telegraphy: he told me that when he was in Rome, not long ago, he found out the proofs of the most formidable conspiracy against this country and all its institutions. It is evident that it is to the intrigues and emissaries of the pope that we owe in great part the horrible civil war, which is threatening to cover the country with blood and ruins.

I am sorry that Professor Morse had to leave Rome before he could know more about the secret plans of the Jesuits against the liberties and the very existence of this country. — Ibid. p. 292.

Twenty men had been hired in Baltimore to assassinate the President elect on his way to Washington. The leader of this band was an Italian refugee, a barber well known in Baltimore. Their plan was as follows: when Mr. Lincoln arrived in that city, the assassins were to mix with the crowd, and get as near his person as possible, and shoot at him with their pistols. If he was in a carriage, hand grenades had been prepared, filled with detonating powder, such as Orsini used in attempting to assassinate Louis Napoleon. These were to be thrown into the carriage, and to make the work of death doubly sure, pistols were to be discharged into the vehicle at the same moment. The assassins had a vessel lying ready to receive them in the harbour. From thence they would be carried to Mobile, in the seceded state of Alabama. — John Smith Dye, The Adder’s Den, p. 113.

An Italian barber well known in Baltimore, a Romanist, was to have stabbed him while seated in his carriage, when he started from the depot. — Burke McCarty, The Suppressed Truth About the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, Arya Varta Publishing, p. 66.

Fortunately, the first plot of the Jesuits to kill Lincoln failed, as they sought to take Lincoln’s life before he ever reached the White House!

While riding on a train John Wilkes Booth dropped a letter written to him by Charles Selby. Shortly after, the letter was found and

“delivered to President Lincoln, who after having read it wrote the word ‘Assassination’ across it, and filed it in his office where it was found after his death and was placed in evidence as a court exhibit.” — Ibid. p. 131.

Here is an excerpt from the letter:

Abe must die, and now. You can choose your weapons, the cup, the knife, the bullet. The cup failed us once and might again…. You know where to find your friends. Your disguises are so perfect and complete….. Strike for your home; strike for your country; bide your time, but strike sure. — Ibid. p. 132. (Emphasis supplied).

This letter was used to help convict Mrs. Mary E. Surratt and some of the other conspirators in the trials of the Lincoln assassination.

They wanted to stab him. If that failed, they were to shoot him, and blow him up. Those failed, so they tried to poison him. “They” were the emissaries of the Pope, the Jesuits. John Smith Dye, who was a witness to these events, tells us,

It was a dark day in our country’s history when an armed guard had to surround the hotel (Willard’s) where the Chief Magistrate had taken temporary lodging to prevent his assassination. And on the day, (March 4, 1861), of his Inauguration, he was escorted up Pennsylvania Avenue in a hollow square of cavalry, and the utmost vigilance was exercised by Gen. Scott to prevent his being publicly assassinated on the way to the Capitol to deliver his Inaugural Address from the east portico. These were terrible times…. — John Smith Dye, The Adder’s Den, p. 135.

When you remember the Council of Vienna, Metternicht, the Pope, and the Jesuit Order’s plans to destroy this country, to destroy its freedom, to destroy Protestantism and to kill Presidents, what does that tell you about the evil, vicious, malicious character of the Jesuits? When you remember their attempts on Andrew Jackson’s life, the assassination of William Henry Harrison, the assassination of Zachary Taylor, the attempted assassination of James Buchanan, the attempted assassination of Abraham Lincoln and then finally his assassination, what does that tell you about the Catholic Church? It shows you that their façade of being a church is just that, a façade. They hide behind a religious mask so that they will not be suspected of the many abominations they continually perpetrate in this country and around the world. May God help us to never have anything to do with this satanic organization.

Abraham Lincoln stated,

So many plots have already been made against my life, that it is a real miracle that they have all failed, when we consider that the great majority of them were in the hands of the skillful Roman Catholic murderers, evidently trained by Jesuits. But can we expect that God will make a perpetual miracle to save my life? I believe not. The Jesuits are so expert in those deeds of blood that Henry IV said it was impossible to escape them, and he became their victim, though he did all that could be done to protect himself. My escape from their hands, since the letter of the Pope to Jeff Davis has sharpened the million of daggers to pierce my breast, would be more than a miracle.

But just as the Lord heard no murmur from the lips of Moses when He told him that he had to die, before crossing the Jordan, for the sins of his people; so I hope and pray that He will hear no murmur from me when I fall for my nation’s sake.

The only two favors I ask of the Lord are, first that I may die for the sacred cause in which I am engaged, and that I am the standard bearer of the rights and liberties of my country.

The second favor I ask of God is, that my dear son, Robert, when I am gone, will be one of those who lift up that flag of liberty which will cover my tomb, and will carry it with honor and fidelity, to the end of his life, as his father did, surrounded by the millions who will be called with him to fight and die for the defense and honor of our country. — Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chick Publications, pp. 302, 303.

Abraham Lincoln understood that his time was near.

In the midst of unparalleled success while all the bells of the land were ringing with joy, a calamity fell upon us which overwhelmed the country in consternation and awe. On Friday evening, April 14, President Lincoln attended Ford’s Theatre, in Washington. He was sitting quietly in his box listening to the drama, when a man entered the door of the lobby leading to the box, closing the door behind him. Drawing near to the President, he drew from his pocket a small pistol, and shot him in the back of the head. As the President fell, senseless and mortally wounded and the shriek of his wife, who was seated at his side, pierced every ear, the assassin leaped from the box, a perpendicular height of nine feet, and as he rushed across the stage, bareheaded, brandished a dagger, exclaiming ‘Sic siemper tyrannus!’ and disappeared behind the side scenes. — Ibid. pp. 307-308.

Noble Abraham, true descendant of the father of the faithful, honest in every trust, humble as a child, tender hearted as a woman, who could not bear to injure even his most envenomed foes: who, in the hour of triumph, was saddened lest the feelings of his adversaries should be wounded by their defeat, with ‘charity for all, malice towards none’, endowed with common sense, intelligence never surpassed and with power of intellect which enabled him to grapple with the most gigantic opponents in debate, developing abilities as a statesman, which won the gratitude of his country and the admiration of the world, and with graces and amiability which drew to him all generous hearts; dies by the bullet of the assassin!

But who was that assassin? Booth was nothing but the tool of the Jesuits. It was Rome who directed his arm, after corrupting his heart and damning his soul. — Ibid. p. 308.

And after twenty years of constant and most difficult researches, I come fearlessly today before the American people, to say and prove that the president, Abraham Lincoln, was assassinated by the priests and the Jesuits of Rome.

In the book of the testimonies given in the prosecution of the assassination of Lincoln, published by Ben Pittman, and in the two volumes of the trial of John Surratt, in 1867, we have the legal and irrefutable proof that the plot of the assassins of Lincoln was matured, if not started, in the house of Mary Surratt, 561 H. Street, Washington, D. C. The sworn testimonies show that it was the common rendezvous of the priests of Washington. What does the presence of so many priests in that house reveal to the world? No man of common sense, who knows anything about the priests of Rome, can doubt that they were the advisers, the counselors, the very soul of that infernal plot.

Those priests, who were the personal friends and the father confessors of Booth, John Surratt, Mrs. and Miss Surratt, could not be constantly there without knowing what was going on, particularly when we know that every one of those priests was a rabid rebel in heart. Every one of those priests, knowing that his infallible pope had called Jeff Davis his dear son, and had taken the Southern Confederacy under his protection, was bound to believe that the most holy thing a man could do, was to fight for the Southern cause by destroying those who were its enemies.

Read the history of the assassination of Admiral Coligny, Henry III and Henry IV, and William the Taciturn, by the hired assassins of the Jesuits; compare them with the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, and you will find that one resembles the other like two drops of water. You will understand that they all come from the same source — Rome! — Ibid. p. 309.

That arch rebel [Jeff Davis] could give the money; but the Jesuits alone could select the assassins, train them, and show them a crown of glory in heaven, if they would kill the author of the bloodshed, the famous renegade and apostate — the enemy of the pope and the church — Lincoln.

Who does not see the lessons given by the Jesuits to Booth, in their daily intercourse in Mary Surratt’s house, when he reads those lines written by Booth a few hours before his death: “I can never repent. God made me the instrument of His punishment.” Compare these words with the doctrines and principles taught by the councils, the decrees of the pope, and the laws of holy Inquisition, and you will find that the sentiments and belief of Booth flow from those principles, as the river flows from its source.

And that pious Miss Surratt, who, the very next day after the murder of Lincoln, said, without being rebuked, in the presence of several other witnesses: “The death of Abraham Lincoln is no more than the death of any nigger in the army.” Where did she get that maxim, if not from her Church? Had not that church recently proclaimed through…the devoted Roman Catholic Judge Taney, in his Dred Scott decision, the Negroes have no right which the white is bound to respect? By bringing the president on a level with the lowest [black man], Rome was saying that he had no right even to his life. — Ibid. p. 310.

Right after Lincoln’s death, John Surratt, who was part of the assassination conspiracy, fled to Montreal. From Montreal he was taken to Liverpool, England and then to Rome. When a United States official finally caught up with him, he was found in the Pope’s personal army. A conspirator in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln was a member of the Pope’s personal army!

Three or four hours before Lincoln was murdered in Washington, the 14th of April, 1865, that murder was not only known by someone, but it was circulated and talked of in the streets and in the houses of the priestly and Romish town of St. Joseph, Minnesota. The fact is undeniable; the testimonies are unchallengeable, and there were no railroad nor any telegraph communications nearer than forty or eighty miles from St. Joseph….

Mr. Linneman, who is a Roman Catholic, tells us that though he heard this from many in his store, and in the streets, he does not remember the name of a single one who told him that…. But if the memory of Mr. Linneman is so deficient on that subject, we can help him and tell him what was said with mathematical accuracy….

…The priests of Saint Joseph were often visiting Washington and boarding, probably, at Mrs. Surratt’s…. Those priests of Washington were in daily communication with their co-rebel priests of St. Joseph; they were their intimate friends. There was no secret among them…. The details of the murder, as the day selected for its commission, were as well known among the priests of St. Joseph as they were among those of Washington….

How could the priests conceal such a joyful event from their bosom friend, Mr. Linneman? He was their confidential man. He was their purveyor; he was their right hand man among the faithful of St. Joseph….

The priests of Rome knew and circulated the death of Lincoln four hours before its occurrence in their Roman Catholic town of St. Joseph, Minnesota. — Ibid. pp. 316, 317.

There is so much more material.

In the trial of John Surratt, a French minister by the name of Rufus King stated this: “I believe that he [John Surratt] is protected by the clergy and that the murder is the result of a deep-laid plot, not only against the life of President Lincoln, but against the existence of this republic, as we are aware that the priesthood and royalty are and always have been opposed to liberty.” — Burke McCarty, The Suppressed Truth About the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, Arya Varta Publishing, p. 185.

Four people were tried, convicted, and executed by hanging for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. Their names were Davy Harold, Lewis Payne, George Atzerodt, and Mary E. Surratt. They were all Roman Catholics. That information is in Ford’s Theater, in several glass cases showing many things about Lincoln, the Civil War, and his assassination. As Abraham Lincoln was being assassinated, an attempt was also made to assassinate William Seward, the Secretary of State. There was also to be an attempt on the life of Ulysses S. Grant, but Grant had to take an emergency trip to New Jersey to be at the bedside of a dying relative. Andrew Johnson, the Vice President of the United States, was also to be assassinated at this time. The man who was to kill him became scared and ran off, riding on a horse into the country, and did not carry out his part of the plan.

Lewis Payne, known as the Florida boy, an athletic young giant, who some months before had joined the conspiracy, rode up to the front of the residence of the Secretary of State, William Seward.

William Seward had been ill for three weeks, suffering from a fractured jaw, the result of the running away of his team and was under the constant care of male nurses.

Payne rang the doorbell and it was answered by the colored butler. He told the latter that he had been sent with some medicine which he must take to the sick room. The butler refused to allow him to enter, saying that he had orders to allow no one to Mr. Seward’s room. The stranger [Lewis Payne], after a short struggle, knocked him down, and went bounding up the stairs. He rushed into the sick chamber, after felling each of the two sons of the Secretary….. He [Lewis Payne] then sprang upon the sick man and seriously stabbed him three times. By a super human effort, the latter struggled out of the bed with his assailant who left him in a heap on the floor, bleeding from the wounds he had inflicted. After his murderous assault on Seward, the ruffian rushed down the stairs, yelling at the top of his voice, “I am mad! I am mad,” and he very probably was. He was entirely under the control of the hypnotic influences of the wicked people in whose power he had allowed himself to be. — Ibid, pp. 121, 122.

It was part of the plan that Michael O’Laughlin one of the conspirators from Baltimore, was to have murdered General Grant that night. This was not possible, owing to the change in the General’s plans.

To Atzerodt, it fell to assassinate Vice President Johnson, but he became frightened and spent the day riding into the country on a horse…. …he was found several days after with relatives of his below Washington. He made a written confession before he was executed which confirmed the presence of Surratt in Washington that fatal day a fact, which nine reputable witnesses had sworn to. — Ibid p. 122.

Thus, we have a conspiracy to kill, not only the President, but to bring the government of the Unites States completely into chaos. Do we not see the fulfillment of the Council of Vienna and Verona at work in 1865? Do we not see the hand of the Jesuit Order and the Roman Catholic Church to destroy this great country? It was an awful time in the history of the United States.

We have already seen that the Roman Catholic Church sowed the seed of division between the two great sections of this country, dividing North from South on the burning question of slavery.

That division was her golden opportunity to crush one by the other, and reign over the bloody ruins of both, a favored, long-standing policy. She hoped that the hour of her supreme triumph over this continent was come. She ordered the Emperor of France to be ready with an Army in Mexico ready to support the South, and she bade all Roman Catholics to enroll themselves under the banners of slavery by joining themselves to the Democratic party. — Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chick Publications, p. 291.

Abraham Lincoln said to Charles Chiniquy,

I will be forever grateful for the warning words you have addressed to me about the dangers ahead to my life, from Rome. I know they are not imaginary dangers. If I were fighting against a Protestant South, as a nation, there would be no danger of assassination. The nations who read the Bible fight bravely on the battlefield, but they do not assassinate their enemies. The pope and the Jesuits, with their infernal inquisition, are the only organized powers in the world which have recourse to the dagger of the assassin to murder those who they cannot convince with their arguments or conquer with the sword.

Unfortunately, I feel more and more every day that it is not against the Americans of the South, alone, I am fighting, it is more against the pope of Rome, his perfidious Jesuits and their blind and bloodthirsty slaves. As long as they hope to conquer the North, they will spare me; but the day we route their armies, take their cities and force them to submit, then, it is my impression that the Jesuits, who are the principal rulers of the South, will do what they have almost invariably done in the past. The dagger or the pistol will do what the strong hands of the warriors could not achieve. This civil war seems to be nothing but a political affair to those who do not see, as I do, the secret springs of that terrible drama. But it is more a religious than a civil war. It is Rome who wants to rule and degrade the North, as she has ruled and degraded the South, from the very day of its discovery. There are only very few of the Southern leaders who are not more or less under the influence of the Jesuits through their wives, family relations, and their friends. Several members of the family of Jeff Davis belong to the Church of Rome….

But it is very certain that if the American people could learn what I know of the fierce hatred of the priests of Rome against our institutions, our schools, our most sacred rights, and our so dearly bought liberties, they would drive them away tomorrow from among us, or they would shoot them as traitors. But you are the only one to whom I reveal these sad secrets for I know that you learned them before me. The history of these last thousand years tells us that wherever the Church of Rome is not a dagger to pierce the bosom of a free nation, she is a stone to her neck, to paralyze her, and prevent her advance in the ways of civilization, science, intelligence, happiness and liberty. — Ibid. pp. 294, 295.

Lincoln said,

This war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons…. I pity the priests, the bishops and the monks of Rome in the United States when the people realize that they are, in great part, responsible for the tears and the bloodshed in this war. — Ibid. pp. 296,297.

You are perfectly correct when you say it was to detach the Roman Catholics who have enrolled themselves in our army. Since the publication of that [the pope’s] letter, a great number of them have deserted their banners and turned traitor…. It is true also, that Meade has remained with us, and gained the bloody battle of Gettysburg. But how could he lose it, when he was surrounded by such heroes as Howard, Reynolds, Buford, Wadsworth, Cutler, Slocum, Sickles, Hancock, Barnes, etc. But it is evident that his Romanism superceded his patriotism after the battle. He let the army of Lee escape when he could easily have cut his retreat and forced him to surrender after losing nearly half of his soldiers in the last three days carnage.

When Meade was to order the pursuit after the battle, a stranger came in haste to the headquarters, and that stranger was a disguised Jesuit. After ten minutes conversation with him, Meade made such arrangements for the pursuit of the enemy that he escaped almost untouched with the loss of only two guns! — Ibid. p. 298.

Lincoln said,

The common people see and hear the big, noisy wheels of the Southern Confederacy’s cars: they call them Jeff Davis, Lee, Toombs, Beauregard, Semmes, etc., and they honestly think they are the motive power, the first cause of our troubles. But this is a mistake. The true motive power is secreted behind the thick walls of the Vatican, the colleges and schools of the Jesuits, the convents of the nuns and the confessional boxes of Rome. — Ibid. p. 305.

In fulfilling the Councils of Vienna, Verona, and Chieri, the Catholic Church divided the North and the South through their agent, John C. Calhoun. They sought to destroy the economy through Nicholas Biddle and then they used the poison cup, and the assassin’s bullet to assassinate and to attempt to assassinate a total of five presidents within a span of twenty-five years. They reddened American soil with the blood of thousands of American young men in the terrible Civil War. Oh, that we had the eyes to see that Rome never changes! What she did, she is still doing today. May God help us to understand the evil of the Roman papacy, then and now.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes. When you see emphasis with “(emphasis added)” following, they’re the author’s emphasis. In places where you see emphasis without “(emphasis added)” following, they are my emphasis.

CHAPTER 5
THE SINKING OF THE TITANIC

When we think of events that have transpired in history over the last one hundred to two hundred years, there are certain events that stand out as ones of great horror, great surprise and great sadness. Of the many that come to mind the most devastating have been the destruction of the the World Trade Center in New York City and the sinking of the Titanic.

The greatest tragedies in the last two hundred years can be traced to the Jesuits. We will now show that the Jesuits planned and carried out the sinking of the Titanic, and we will show why they did it.

Since the early 1830’s, America did not have a central bank. The Jesuits desperately wanted another central bank in America so that they would have a bottomless reservoir from which to draw money for their many wars and other hideous schemes around the world.

In 1910, seven men met on Jekyll Island just off the coast of Georgia to establish a central bank, which they called the Federal Reserve Bank. These men were Nelson Aldrich and Frank Vanderlip, both representing the Rockefeller financial empire; Henry Davison, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong, representing J.P. Morgan; and Paul Warburg, representing the Rothschild banking dynasty of Europe. We have already seen that the Rothschilds were the banking agents for the papacy’s Jesuits, holding “the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church.”

These three financial families, the Rothschilds, Morgans, and Rockefellers all do the bidding of the Jesuit Order because of Jesuit infiltration in their organizations. They do whatever is necessary to destroy constitutional liberty in America and to bring the pope to world domination. As we look back over the 20th century, we see how successful the Jesuits have been. They have continued to squander the wealth of America and continually attack its great constitution and civil liberties. Daily, the power of the pope in Vatican City increases. One day they will achieve total power again.

The building of the Titanic began in 1909 at a shipyard in Belfast, the capitol of Northern Ireland. Belfast was a Protestant haven and was hated by the Jesuits. World War One began just a few years later.

The Titanic was one of a fleet of ships owned by the White Star Line, an international shipping company.

There were a number of very rich and powerful men who made it abundantly clear that they were not in favor of the Federal Reserve System. J.P. Morgan was ordered by the Jesuits to build the Titanic. This ‘unsinkable’ ship would serve as the death ship for those who opposed the Jesuits’ plan for a Federal Reserve system.

These rich and powerful men would have been able to block the establishment of the Federal Reserve, and their power and fortunes had to be taken out of their hands. They had to be destroyed by a means so preposterous that no one would suspect that they were murdered, and no one would suspect the Jesuits. The Titanic was the vehicle of their destruction. In order to further shield the papacy and the Jesuits from suspicion, many Irish, French, and Italian Roman Catholics immigrating to the New World were aboard. They were people who were expendable. Protestants from Belfast who wanted to immigrate to the United States were also invited on board.

All the wealthy and powerful men the Jesuits wanted to get rid of were invited to take the cruise. Three of the richest and most important of these were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isador Strauss, the head of Macy’s Department Stores, and John Jacob Astor, probably the wealthiest man in the world. Their total wealth, at that time, using dollar values of their day was more than 500 million dollars. Today that amount of money would be worth nearly eleven billion dollars. These three men were coaxed and encouraged to board the floating palace. They had to be destroyed because the Jesuits knew they would use their wealth and influence to oppose a Federal Reserve Bank as well as the various wars that were being planned.

Edward Smith was the captain of the Titanic. He had been traveling the North Atlantic waters for twenty-six years and was the world’s most experienced master of the North Atlantic routs. He had worked for Jesuit, J.P. Morgan, for many years.

Edward Smith was a ‘Jesuit tempore co-adjator.’ This means that he was not a priest, but he was a Jesuit of the short robe. Jesuits are not necessarily priests. Those who are not priests serve the order through their profession. Anyone could be a Jesuit, and their identity would not be known. Edward Smith served the Jesuit Order in his profession as a sea captain.

Many interesting points about the Titanic are discussed in a videotape made by National Geographic in 1986. The videotape is entitled The Secrets of the Titanic. When the Titanic departed from Southern England on April 10, 1912, Francis Browne, the Jesuit master of Edward Smith, boarded the Titanic. This man was the most powerful Jesuit in all of Ireland and answered directly to the general of the Jesuit Order in Rome. The videotape declares:

Browne went over with Edward Smith one last time exactly what he was supposed to do in the North Atlantic waters. The Jesuit General told Francis Browne what was to happen; Browne then tells Smith and the rest is history. Edward Smith believed that the Jesuit General

Edward Smith was given an order to sink the Titanic and that is exactly what he did.

Let us remember the oath that every person takes to become a part of the Jesuit Order:

When a person takes the Jesuit Oath, he is bound to his master until the day that he dies. Edward Smith had become a man without will or intelligence. He would commit any crime the Order wanted him to commit. Edward Smith had been required for martyrdom. On board the Titanic that night, Edward Smith knew his duty. He was under oath.

The ship had been built for the enemies of the Jesuits. After three days at sea with only one pair of glasses for the bridge, Edward Smith propelled the Titanic full speed ahead, twenty-two knots, on a moonless dark night through a gigantic ice field nearly eighty square miles in area. Edward Smith did this despite at least eight telegrams warning him to be more cautious because he was going too fast.

Did Edward Smith need one caution? No, he had been traveling those waters for twenty-six years. He knew there were icebergs in that area. But eight cautions did not stop this man who was under the Jesuit oath, and under orders to destroy the Titanic.

The absurdity of warning veteran Captain Edward Smith repeatedly on Titanic’s tragic night to slow down is nothing short of preposterous. The fact that Smith never listened or heeded the warnings is insane. He had been given orders from his god in the Vatican, and nothing would turn him from his course.

The encyclopedias paint a very tragic picture of Smith in his last hours. When it came time to give the order to load and lower the lifeboats, Smith wavered and one of his aids had to approach him for the order to be given. Smith’s legendary skills of leadership seem to have left him; he was curiously indecisive and unusually cautious on that fatal night. Are these words to describe a legendary sea captain with 26 years of experience, or are these words to describe a man who was struggling in his mind whether he should do his duty as a sea captain or obey his master who told him to sink the ship?

John Jacob Astor’s wife got into a life boat and was saved, while John Jacob Astor perished in the waters of the North Atlantic. There were not enough lifeboats and many of them were only half full with only women and children.

To prevent nearby freighters from responding with help, the distress flares were white when they should have been red. White flares to passing freighters state that everybody was having a party.

One of the greatest tragedies of the twentieth century, the sinking of the Titanic, lies at the door of the Jesuit Order. The unsinkable ship, the floating palace was created to be the tomb for the wealthy, who opposed the Federal Reserve System. By April, 1912, all opposition to the Federal Reserve was eliminated. In December of 1913, the Federal Reserve System came into being in the United States. Eight months later, the Jesuits had sufficient funding through the Federal Reserve bank to begin World War One.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes. When you see emphasis with “(emphasis added)” following, they’re the author’s emphasis. In places where you see emphasis without “(emphasis added)” following, they are my emphasis.

CHAPTER 11
WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACK

The story of the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, does not begin on that day. It began shortly after World War One. After the war, Jesuit Edward Mandell House and Woodrow Wilson created the League of Nations. When U.S. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge Sr. kept America out of the League. the Jesuits were furious. This must never happen again. So, in 1921, under the influence of House, an organization was formed in the United States called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

This organization attracted people of power, wealth, and influence. It enlisted politicians, people from the media, and big businessmen. The ultimate goal of the CFR was to break down all national boundaries and to establish a one-world system of government. Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a member of the CFR for 16 years, stated:

The Jesuits have always hated America and everything this country stands for, and they work tirelessly to destroy this country.

The great objective of the CFR was the destruction of American sovereignty and constitutional liberties. To accomplish this, both the Republican and Democratic parties were to be controlled, and a central bank was to be created, the Federal Reserve Bank.

The Jesuits have been extremely successful in carrying out the purposes of the papacy’s malignant Congress at Vienna, Verona, and Chieri. The Jesuits, with the aid of their CFR, control the highest of echelons in the political, judicial, business, banking, media, and religious arenas in the United States. Their plans are right on schedule.

When they failed to get America into the League of Nations after World War One, they created the CFR, which began immediately to use the schools, colleges, and the media to condition Americans to accept the Jesuits’ second attempt to create a world government after World War Two. America was so conditioned by then that they accepted the United Nations, and joined.

The Jesuits’ CFR is extremely dangerous to the continued existence of the American Republic. A few patriots like Chester Ward and President Kennedy rejected their malicious plans and fought their agenda. Kennedy paid for his disobedience to the Jesuits with his life. Some of the past CFR members who were either Jesuits or Jesuit pawns to do their bidding are Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Adlai Stevenson, Hubert Humphrey, and George McGovern. Current members of the Jesuit CFR include Federal Reserve Bank chairman Alan Greenspan, Congressmen Newt Gingrich and Richard Gephardt, both presidents George Herbert Walker Bush and his son, George Walker Bush, Vice president Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor, Joseph Lieberman, and John Chafee. (Chafee was the man who introduced gun laws after Waco, remember?) Bill Clinton, of course, is a member of the CFR.

Major companies under Jesuit/CFR control include the Ford Motor Company, Boeing Corporation, Pepsi-Cola, Heinz Co., Lockheed-Martin, Time Warner, and Chevron. In the media, NBC, CBS, N.Y. Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, and Time, are just a few media outfits dominated by the Jesuits. All these organizations promote the Jesuits’ plan for destroying America. Some top media people who promote the Jesuit Plan include Tom Brokaw, Barbara Walters, David Brinkley, John Chancellor, Katharine Graham, and Ted Koppel, all CFR members. John Swinton, Chief of Staff for the New York Times, who is considered to be the dean of his profession, made a most bold confession. In 1953, at a New York Press Club, he declared,

Swinton explained so well that the media are under the control of the rich. We have previously shown that the richest people in America are either Jesuits or are under their control. The Jesuits are telling us, via the newspapers, magazines, and every other mass-media communication outlet, exactly what they want us to believe. One of their biggest efforts is to make the people of the world believe that the pope is the great man of peace, when, in reality, the pope and his Jesuits are working constantly to establish the pope as the supreme dictator of the world as he was in the Dark Ages. When they accomplish this, the horrible persecution by the papacy in the Dark Ages will return. Americans are being beguiled to give up their constitutional civil liberties and their country. The tragedies we are witnessing today are blamed on terrorists, but these terrorist organizations have been infiltrated and controlled by the Jesuits. This very effectively covers up the footprints of the papacy in these tragedies.

Let us now turn to the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Along with the total destruction of the World Trade Center, thousands of innocent people died. The negative impact on America and its economy has been devastating. Multiple businesses have been ruined by the fallout.

In order to defend against future attacks like this, the United States Government made a feeble attempt to find the perpetrators of this atrocity in Afghanistan. But their major thrust in this war against terrorism has been to take away what is left of the rights and liberties of American citizens. For some unexplained reason, if the civil rights of American citizens are taken away, there isn’t supposed to be any more terrorism. This onslaught against Americans has come from the White House, the Justice Department, Congress, and the news media. The people in government take a solemn oath to defend and obey the Constitution of the United States, but their oath has been shown to be a gigantic lie. They totally and completely ignore the constitution as they pass their destructive legislation and executive orders.

From the beginning of his presidency, George Bush has been promoting the Jesuit agenda. Two months into his presidency, surrounded by cardinals of Rome, the President dedicated a cultural center in Washington, D.C. to the greatest enemy this Republic has ever had — the pope of Rome. Bush declared that he is going to enforce the words and teachings of the pope here in America.

John Paul’s words and teachings represent the plan to destroy Protestantism, to destroy the Constitution of the United States, and to restore his throne as universal monarch. By his own words, we see that George Bush is carrying out the plan of the Jesuits to destroy America.

Who is calling the shots in Washington, D.C.? If we think it is the President of the U.S., we are deceiving ourselves.

Should we be surprised if Bush and his fellow altar boys are pushing the Jesuit program? Should we be surprised to see Bush issuing executive orders that destroy constitutional liberties? Should we be surprised to see Congress passing laws that destroy constitutional liberties?

This is alarming information. The highest echelons in the United States Government, the highest echelons in business and finance, and the highest echelons in the schools, colleges, and media, are all claiming to be Americans. They are all claiming to be working for the betterment of America. They are all claiming to be working for the preservation of the Constitution. In fact, they are under the control of the Jesuits, the most implacable enemies of this Republic. With a patriotic and religious facade, they are secretly leading America to ruin. Deception is being practiced by the most sinister of foes, the Jesuits of Rome.

What has happened in the aftermath of the World Trade Center destruction? The day after the center was destroyed the Orlando Sentinel writes,

In the reader forum of the Orlando Sentinel, Sept. 12th, the question was raised, “What personal freedoms would you give up to fight terrorism?” One person, the next day, wrote in and said, “I have no problem with having to give up something for the greater good of myself and my brothers and sisters.” This person does not realize that as the government usurps more and more power; liberty, freedom, and safety decrease in direct proportion. This person does not realize that when the government has all the power, no one is safe, and bloody persecution is the result. Remember Waco?

The main purpose of the World Trade Center tragedy was to make American citizens willing to give up their freedoms. The World Trade Center attack was necessary because the bombing in Oklahoma did not panic the American people enough to get more of the desired so-called ‘antiterrorism laws’ passed.

One of the scary things about face recognition is that it is notoriously unreliable. You might be identified as a terrorist because the machine made a mistake.

There has been an onslaught of media articles and statements suggesting the giving up of certain civil liberties just as the Jesuit agenda requires. On October 26, 2001, George Bush signed the misnamed USA Patriot Act of 2001, which was proposed five days after the tragedy. Just six weeks after the World Trade Center was destroyed, this bill was passed. This is truly amazing. It is virtually impossible for a bill to be conceived, written, debated, and passed this quickly. You see, they already had the bill written before the tragedy occurred.

Laura Murphy of the American Civil Liberties Union stated in that article, “We cannot as a nation allow very legitimate public anxiety to immunize the administration and Congress from their obligation to protect the Bill of Rights and the fundamental values that document embodies.” In the name of fighting terrorism, the government is taking away Constitutional liberties and freedoms just as fast as they can. This will lead to terrible persecution in the United States, which will be much worse than the physical tragedies themselves.

In the same paper, on the same day, there’s a cartoon of two children, decorating a Christmas tree. One sings, “He sees you when you are sleeping, He knows when you are awake, He knows if you have been bad or good….” The other child says, “Enough about Attorney General Ashcroft already!”

In America, in the last eight years, there have been three terrible tragedies: Waco, Oklahoma City, and the World Trade Center. In every case, the government’s solution to the problems has been greatly increased government power and the loss of Constitutional liberties and freedoms. In this short time period of eight years, we have seen a very serious despoiling of the Constitution, the greatest document ever created by men. An insidious war is raging against Constitutional liberty in America. In the aftermath of the World Trade Center destruction, this certainly has been the focal point of politicians and media. Claiming to be loyal Americans, agents of the Jesuits in Congress and the media have been carrying out the their plan to destroy America with almost no opposition.

Remember, the Jesuits are totally antagonistic to the American Constitution and everything it stands for. Charles Chiniquy says,

Watch carefully as Chiniquy compares the distinctions between the two.

We saw that the President of the United States declared in the Washington Times that he is going to obey the pope. If so, he must destroy the Constitution. In the aftermath of the destruction of the World Trade Center, Bush has apparently been following the pope’s agenda to the letter.

The destruction of the World Trade Center and the destruction of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City were planned events for the specific purpose of creating terror in America so that Americans, in fear, would give away their Constitutional liberties and freedoms. The Jesuits’ plan is working extremely well. With politicians, schools and colleges, the media, and big corporations in their hands, America is being rapidly defeated by the enemy within.

As American troops prepared to do battle with an extreme Moslem faction in Afghanistan, USA Today quoted the President as saying, “his administration is readying a crusade against terrorism.” (USA Today, September 17, 2001.)

A crusade? Crusades were Catholic holy wars fought during the Dark Ages against Moslem hordes who refused to relinquish Jerusalem to the pope. What does George Bush mean by a crusade? Alberto Rivera, an ex-Jesuit priest, in his crusader series, has made it clear that the Vatican created Islam to destroy Christians and Jews, protect Roman Catholics, and to capture Jerusalem for the pope. For the first few hundred years of their existence, Islam did just that. When it came time for the powerful generals of the Islamic armies to surrender Jerusalem to the pope, they, realizing their power, refused to give it up. Thus, the papacy created the Crusades to drive the Islamic forces out of Jerusalem, and establish the throne of the pope in Jerusalem.

Why a crusade now? Why are America and extremist Islamic factions fighting? There are three things the Jesuits wish to accomplish from this situation. As we have seen, the Constitution has been a thorn in their side for hundreds of years; they want it destroyed completely. By continuing to create terror in America, the Jesuits will one day get their ultimate goal. They also want to pay back the Islamic extremists for disobeying them when they didn’t give the pope Jerusalem when he wanted it. Finally, war will continue in the Middle East until the weary multitudes of the world cry out for a peaceful solution to the conflict. When that time arrives, guess who will be considered the only peacemaker whose presence in Jerusalem would bring the long coveted peace? Placing the pope as leader in that troubled region will appear to be the only answer because the controlled press/media will have conditioned everyone to the idea. So, the pope will reign in Jerusalem; mission accomplished.

Let us consider Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden was aided by America during the Afghan-Soviet conflict in the 1980s and was fighting with America during the Balkan conflict in the late 1990s. Overwhelming information reveals bin Laden’s business ties to the Bush family, and he has had contact with the CIA as late as July, 2000. Osama bin Laden is a plant just like Lee Harvey Oswald and Timothy McVeigh were plants. He is being used as the patsy to keep the blame away from where it really belongs — the Jesuits of the papacy.

Milt Bearden, an ex-CIA Afghanistan operations director and bin Laden’s intelligence advisor, was interviewed by Dan Rather on September 12, 2001. Rather wanted Bearden to state that bin Laden was responsible for the World Trade Center disaster. Bearden stated, “If they didn’t have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one.”

Recently (2001), Rick Wiles, speaker for the American Freedom News, interviewed Dr. Koryagina, the economic advisor to Vladimir Putin, leader of Russia. In the interview, she discussed secret societies, criminal and religious organizations that are controlling the world. She also declared that there is a shadow government seeking to bring down the United States and bring in world government. She warned in Moscow, in July of 2001, that the United States would be attacked. She said that when the American people wake up to what is happening to them, and who did it, they will be in a state of shock. “Everybody knows about organized crime and the Mafia. Also people have known for a long time about secret societies and so forth. During my research, I started to notice that those structures can be put together and can be joined. And I realized that right now, we have a criminal monster, a hybrid of organized crime, Mafia and secret societies that have merged together.” (aired December 6, 2001)

Will we listen to the words of this renowned Russian economist? Secret societies are bringing all these agencies together to create a one world government. When America figures it out, they will be in shock. Dr. Koryagina said everything but naming the secret society that is calling the shots, and who masterminded the World Trade Center destruction. The Jesuits of Rome.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes.

CHAPTER 9
THE WACO MASSACRE

A religious group known as the Branch Davidians lived in their compound they called Mt. Carmel just outside Waco, Texas. On April 19, 1993 agents of the United States government attacked their compound and murdered helpless women and children with battle tanks, flame-throwers, and poison gas. Nearly 100 innocent people lost their lives as a result. What makes this a tragedy of the most terrible proportions is that the Davidians had done nothing to provoke this attack by the United States’ government.

The Branch Davidians got along well with those of the surrounding community. They had some religious beliefs that made them different from other churches, but, then, many of the so-called standard churches differ from each other. Their religious differences were certainly no excuse for the United States government to destroy their home and their lives, especially without a trial. The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the right to worship God according to the dictates of one’s own conscience, but the government completely ignored this right in the massacre at Waco.

An extremely important point to understand is that virtually everything the government and the news media said about these people were lies. Many so-called experts delivered testimony that caused the majority of people to believe the exact opposite of the truth. Because of these extensive lies, very few people know what the Branch Davidians were really like, and very few people know exactly what took place during the siege at Waco. The lies were told in order to try to justify in some impossible way what the government did there.

The First Amendment to the Constitution says that the government shall make NO law pertaining to religion. The constitutional rights of the Branch Davidians were totally ignored. The murderers were guilty of the most heinous crimes, and they totally got away with it.

The words “cult” and “sect” are used any time the government or news media want to cast suspicion on or discredit a particular church group.

Both of these articles tell of malicious rumors being circulated about the Branch Davidians. Nothing ever came of them. David Koresh, the leader of the Davidians, learned that the ATF wanted to get complete information about him in June, 1992. Koresh invited the BATF [the government’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms] to come out to the Mount Carmel compound in order to look and see what ever they wanted. Tragically, the BATF refused to come out.

The siege on the Davidian compound began on February 28, 1993. Instead of simply knocking on the front door, 100 BATF agents stormed the compound to arrest David Koresh. Koresh went jogging quite frequently, and the government could have arrested him during those times, but they weren’t interested in simply arresting Koresh. The government wanted a confrontation. Unthreatened BATF and FBI agents opened fire with automatic weapons at the front door and the walls, knowing that there were innocent women and children inside.

During this siege, four BATF agents were killed. The four BATF agents, that died on February 28, had all been bodyguards for Bill Clinton from the time of the Democratic convention until Bill Clinton became president. These four BATF agents were the only federal agents to die in the siege at Waco. Linda Thompson’s videotape entitled Waco, the Big Lie, shows that those BATF agents were not killed or shot at by Branch Davidians. The tape shows the agents going into the compound through an upstairs window. It then shows the other BATF agent, who is out on the roof, actually shooting in through the window where those BATF agents had just entered. Those four BATF agents, who were bodyguards of Bill Clinton, were killed by their own people!

There are many questions in the Waco tragedy that have never been answered. Why did Bill Clinton go to such extremes at Waco? There were problems at the Mount Carmel compound in 1987. There was a shoot out over the leadership of the Branch Davidians between David Koresh and his followers and George Roden and his followers. Seven Davidians, at that time, along with David Koresh, were arrested, indicted, and tried for attempted murder. According to the prosecutor in the case, McClennan County District Attorney Vic Feazell:

The government’s action was a vulgar display of power, being met with fear and paranoia on the part of the Davidians. If the federal government had called and talked to the Davidians, the Davidians would have given them what ever they wanted.

Koresh had another situation involving Federal authorities. On an April 21st, 1993 television interview, Henry McMahon, who owned a gun store in Waco, stated that

Koresh had been extremely cooperative in 1987 and then again in 1992. There was obviously some sinister reason why Federal agents, under the leadership of Bill Clinton, perpetrated such cruelty at Mt. Carmel. Let us investigate the real reason for the Waco massacre.

If David Koresh was the prime target of the government, why was he not arrested peacefully so that so many innocent lives would not have been lost? The claims or lies of the BATF were that Koresh never was out of the compound where he could be arrested. Paul Fatta, a Branch Davidian who was out on errands when the raid started, made this comment in many press releases.

Why wasn’t Koresh arrested on one of those jogging outings or when he was in Waco?

Did the Branch Davidians know they were being attacked by federal agents? David Thibodeau, a Waco survivor, was interviewed on A Current Affair, a national television show, May 3rd, 1993. He declared that one of the members of the Branch Davidians, Wayne Martin, a Harvard-trained attorney, called 911 shortly after the federal agents stormed the compound. He was put through to another agency, and the person said, “Well, hi boys, how y’all doin’ out there?” Wayne Martin screams into the phone, “We’re getting shot at. We’re getting killed. We’re getting killed.”

Since all 911 calls are preserved, it seems that it would be easy to confirm this phone call, but as Current Affair reporter Mary Garafolo stated, “It has become a controversial recording that the police refuse to release to the press.” There was absolutely no response to that emergency 911 call. Why not? Only people working for a power that hates our liberties and freedoms could do such a thing. Jesuit Bill Clinton, who took a solemn oath to obey the Constitution, totally ignored the Constitution in the abomination that occurred at Waco.

We should explain here that the name, Black Pope, is the name or title given to the supreme Jesuit general, who is probably the most powerful man in the world. He remains totally in the background, and very few even know about him.

Let us next investigate the charges of physical or sexual abuse at the Mount Carmel compound. James Tom, an ex-Davidian, was the loudest critic of the Branch Davidians. He stated that David Koresh spanked his (Tom’s) daughter for 30 to 40 minutes, and Tom, who was standing right there, did nothing to stop it. If David Koresh truly spanked his daughter for 30 to 40 minutes, how could a father be so afraid that he would not intervene to stop it?

Tom declared that Koresh was the image of Charles Manson. If Koresh was the image of Manson, why would Tom join in the first place?

When 21 children were allowed to leave the Mount Carmel Center, the Houston Post stated “The 21 children were psychologically in good condition. They were in good condition physically and they were also very well educated.” In fact, the children, who left Mount Carmel, were not physically, mentally, morally, or psychologically abused at all.

David Koresh was demonized by those most guilty of the massacre to be some absolutely crazy monster. Bob Ricks, the man in charge of the Waco massacre, stated that David Koresh was a classical sociopath.

Attorney General Janet Reno called him “a dangerous criminal.” Fort Worth News columnist Bill Thompson called him “a vile mass murderer,” and Bill Clinton referred to him as “dangerous, irrational, and probably insane.”

These people practice what V. I. Lenin advised: “Call your enemy what you are, and always tell the exact opposite of the truth.” David Koresh was demonized to try to justify their heinous crime.

Another most despicable crime of the Waco murderers was the spraying of CS gas into the compound at the women and small children. U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated that

Benjamin Garrett, executive director of Chemical and Biological Arms Control stated,

CS gas would have most harshly affected the children — The smaller you are, the sooner you would feel the response. — Ibid.

CS gas is one of the most cruel poisons that the government could have used against the small children. Pictures from the massacre showed small children, burned black, with their backs arched backward in what had to have been a most horrible death. The people that gave the order for CS gas to be pumped into the Waco compound had called David Koresh some terrible names. They also stated they pumped the gas in for the sake of the children. The awful names applied to Koresh apply to them, and the same people, Bill Clinton, Janet Reno, and Bob Ricks murdered those children at Waco. With so many crimes committed at Waco by people in high places, we turn to the aftermath of the Waco tragedy. Many times an event can be better understood by the events that transpire after it. Who benefits? Was any controversial legislation passed that would destroy Constitutional liberty? Was this pay back for something done in the past?

Two weeks after the massacre at Mount Carmel compound, John Chafee, a senator from Rhode Island, called for a new law that would be a nationwide ban on hand gun ownership. It would prohibit the sale, possession, importing, and exporting of hand guns. Had Chafee’s proposal become law, it would have torn a huge gap in the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which says, “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Every gun law that Congress passes is an infringement against this right. Who wants to disarm American citizens? No one wants to be the dictator of a nation with 200 million guns around. When the citizens of a nation are armed, where their right to own guns is not infringed, the crime rate is extremely low.

Every man in Switzerland is required to have guns in his home, including assault rifles. Crime in Switzerland is almost non-existent. In states and cities in America that allow people to carry guns, the crime rate is extremely low. During World War Two, Hitler wanted to invade Switzerland. The Swiss told him that he could send his army across the boarder, but none of his officers would return. Hitler gave the order to invade Switzerland several times, but his officers simply would not obey. Switzerland remained safely neutral all during the war. Who has hated the Constitution from the very beginning? From the very inception of this country, the Jesuits have sought to destroy the Constitution. They called the Constitution a Satanic document. The great French General Lafayette once said,

It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country — the United States — are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated most of the wars in Europe. — Eric Jon Phelps, Vatican Assassins, Halycon Unified Services, p. 54.

The Jesuits used their man, Bill Clinton, to instigate and carry out the destruction at Waco. They hoped to then be able to pass the illegal laws that would effectively abolish the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution in the aftermath. It is easy to identify the Jesuits and the Jesuit puppets in the United States Congress, because they are the ones that continually try to get restrictive gun legislation passed. There was another reason for Waco that Bill Clinton disclosed April 19th and 20th of 1993. This statement was made in the Rose Garden and can be found in White House press release documents.

I want to say as I did yesterday, I am very sorry for the loss of life which occurred at the beginning and at the end of this tragedy in Waco. I hope very much that others who will be tempted to join cults and to become involved with people like David Koresh will be deterred by the horrible scenes they have seen over the last seven weeks. And I hope very much that the difficult situations which federal agents confronted there and which they will be doubtless required to confront in other contexts in the future will be somewhat better handled and better understood because of what has been learned now.

In his own words, Clinton issued a warning and a threat to anyone who would dare join a religious group that was a so-called cult. To Clinton and his agents, a cult is a group that is not part of any mainstream religious organization.

Every major religious organization has been infiltrated and taken over by the Jesuits. They want everyone to stay in the mainstream organizations so that they can more easily be indoctrinated. Anyone outside the main churches will be more difficult to brainwash. According to Ex-Jesuit priest, Alberto Rivera, all the mainstream churches were taken over by 1980. Dr. Rivera explained that when he was under the extreme oath of the Jesuits, he was told that a secret sign was to be given to the Jesuits world-wide when the ecumenical movement had successfully wiped out protestantism, in preparation for the signing of a concordat between the Vatican and the U.S.

The sign was to be when a President of the U.S. took his oath of office facing an obelisk. For the first time in U.S. history, the swearing in ceremonies were moved to the West front of the Capitol, and President Reagan faced the Washington Monument. This happened January 20, 1981. — Jack Chick, The Godfathers, Alberto Part Three, Chick Publications, page 26.

Waco was a warning not to join an independent church where the truth about the papacy and the antichrist would be exposed. Bill Clinton declared that Waco was a warm up, and confronting religious groups would happen again! Does this sound like the words of a man who would defend the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, or does it sound like a Jesuit who is carrying out the plans of the papacy? Remember, in the secret Congress at Chieri, it was declared,

Protestantism must therefore be utterly abolished… Catholics shall be imbued with hatred for all heretics [A heretic is anyone who does not believe the Catholic religion, anyone who opposes the pope, and anyone who believes the pope is the anti-christ]…. We shall strike deadly blows at heresy…. They little think that Jesuits have in store for them the censorship gags and flames and will one day be their masters. — Hector Macpherson, The Jesuits in History, Ozark Book Publishers, Appendix I.

Bill Clinton was a Jesuit, determined to carry out the Jesuit plan of Chieri.

Pope John Paul II has stated it very clearly.

All of these new religious groups have one thing in common; they all believe that the evil anti-christ system of Bible prophecy is the papacy.

Malachi Martin discusses these groups and says they

are destined to undergo a series of severe shocks and mutations as, willy-nilly, they adapt themselves to the new globalism emanating from more powerful groups. There is no way that any one of them will be able to maintain itself in any vibrancy and progressive strength unless it allows — or suffers — its provincialism to be enlarged beyond the confines it traditionally observed…. As groups they will have to face dire alternatives. Either they will become thoroughly and realistically globalized… Or, as groups, they will remain in place, diminish in numbers and influence, and finally lose their identity as operative parts in a new world order. — Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood, Simon and Schuster, pp. 291, 292.

In other words; everyone who goes along with the Jesuits plan for the world will be allowed to live and those who do not will experience Waco! Waco was a warning that the Jesuits want to return the world to another Dark Age in which all the world becomes the slaves of the pope. If anyone does not submit to the papacy, they will be treated like the people at Mt. Carmel.

Here is one last thought. If you were the president of the United States or the Attorney General at the time of the Waco massacre, and you did not want to poison small children with CS gas, would you have the authority to stop it? Of course you would. All you would have to do is pick up the phone. The fact that Bill Clinton and Janet Reno did not stop this atrocity is proof that it was their desire that the massacre took place.

This is the continuation of Chapter 4. Medical Madman in the Beltway

Fauci pays Wuhan Lab to develop coronavirus in spite of the obvious. You research a virus, and in the process, it leaks out of the laboratory and it spreads through the population all around the world. Like a prophet, you tell Georgetown listeners and the Trump administration that there will be a pandemic during the Trump White House! You proceed full speed ahead knowing full well that the world will be brought to its knees and that 100’s of thousands of people will die! Like a medical madman, you go full bore like an insane man because the end justifies the mean. Like Edward Smith aboard the Titanic on that fateful night, you head straight for the icebergs, knowing many will die because your masters have told you this is for the greater glory of the Catholic Church! What kind of a group of men would encourage such insanity?

The following quote gives a historical backdrop to the Jesuits and explains their mentality.

What Anthony Fauci has done, in attacking Protestant ideals, fits into the Jesuits/ papacy’s hands to bring the world to its knees in obeisance to Rome!! Therefore, in the minds of Rome’s hierarchy, Fauci is a wonderful man! What are the ideals of Protestantism that have come under attack through this virus? A rocket scientist is not necessary to figure this one out. The current totals of unemployed who lost good jobs to take care of their families is around 4-5 million people. A recent study from Silicon Valley is declaring that it could take upwards of 10 years to bring those jobs back!! So, while millions of people lose their jobs, the economic fabric of America sits in shambles and is being drained! Another thing that has been assaulted is the civil and religious liberties that make this nation great. Finally, half a million people have died from this virus and the numbers continue to grow. For those who want to reduce the population of the world, this fits their plan perfectly.

Let us take a look at each of these things that have been assaulted during the coronavirus affair and see how fit into Protestantism. First, millions of good jobs have been lost. Many lower and middle classed jobs have been thrown to the wind. History tells us that in the Roman Empire period, the lower classes were called the plebian sector or poor class. The plebian members of society were predominantly poor, working either for the local lord or baron or priest. After the fall of Rome, the new names given to the poor classes were peasants or serfs. Like the plebian classes, the serfs and peasants were subject to their lord or noble who controlled the land and everything else. “Before the Protestant Reformation in the 1500’s, all the nations of the world were poor, much like the continent of Africa today. After the Reformation, literacy flourished, economic principles were articulated, and entire nations rose out of poverty. This produced a thriving middle class for the first time in human history.” ‘Understanding the Culture: A survey of Social Engagement’, Jeff Myers. The Reformation brought about a flourishing middle class made of artisans, welders, printers, and the like.

Before the Reformation, all the Papal hierarchy had to do was control the king, or the baron, or the land owner. If he was controlled, then it would be easy to control the illiterate serfs and peasants. With the rise of the Reformation and the middle class, people began thinking more for themselves, independent of lords and barons, making a way for themselves and their families. The middle class made it much more difficult to control the populace because these people would think for themselves and the papacy did not want this! In order to bring the world back under Rome’s sway, the middle class thinking people must be reduced and finally eliminated in Rome’s plan. Coronavirus went a long way toward achieving Rome’s agenda!

Civil and religious liberty was virtually an unknown commodity during the Dark Ages of Papal tyranny. “Nevertheless, in defending a gospel of salvation “by faith alone,” Luther introduced a new source of authority into the bloodstream of the West. For nearly a thousand years, every European man and woman owed allegiance to two kinds of authority: political (kings, nobles, magistrates) and religious (popes, councils, bishops, or their representatives). When it came to deciding matters of faith, however, Luther found both to be deeply flawed and untrustworthy….

“With the help of the printing press, this 16th century protest against corruption in the Catholic Church would drastically change the course of Christianity – and history itself. In the process, Luther laid bare the scandal of Christendom: a political society that preserved spiritual unity through coercion and violence. Dissent from orthodoxy was outlawed; heresy was rooted out and punished by fire and sword. The papal bull of 1520 excommunicating Luther from the Catholic Church, for example, accused him of promoting 41 heresies and “pestiferous errors.” One of the alleged errors was his view that “the burning of heretics is against the will of the Holy Spirit.” Luther offers his fullest treatment of these issues in Secular Authority where he sharply distinguished the aims of church and state, limiting the reach of government to preserving life and property… Other reformers sought a radical separation of church and state, a concept that Luther ultimately rejected. Others went further in defending the rights of all religious believers, even heretics and non-believers, in civic and political life…. In the 18th century, the United States became the first nation to enshrine in its constitution the Protestant conception of the rights of conscience. James Madison, the mind behind the First Amendment, was inspired by Luther’s achievement. In a letter to F.L. Schaeffer, dated 1821, Madison explained that the American model of religious liberty “illustrates the excellence of a system which, by a due distinction, to which the genius and courage of Luther led the way, between what is due to Caesar and what is due God, best promotes the discharge of both obligations.” ‘National Geographic’, Joseph Loconte, Ph.D., October 27, 2017

By distinguishing between duties to God and duties to man, Luther paved the way to church state separation, the inherent rights of man to civil and religious freedom, and paved the way for the grand experiment called America!! In the eyes of the Roman hierarchy, these blood bought Protestant freedoms cannot stand! Thus, we are confronted by a pandemic and the mad man of the Beltway!

What about population control? “The Georgia Guide stones are a granite monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the United States. A set of 10 guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts. The monument stands at an approximate elevation of 750 feet (230 m) above sea level, about 90 miles (140 km) east of Atlanta, 45 miles (72 km) from Athens, Georgia and 9 miles (14 km) north of the center of the city of Elberton… The anonymity of the guide stones’ authors and their apparent advocacy of population control, eugenics, and internationalism have made them a target for controversy.” Wikipedia The Georgia guide stones reek of Jesuit/papal globalism and population reduction. While we have seen with the coronavirus over 350,000 dead worldwide, there could be many, many more before this is all over.

Coronavirus, Anthony Fauci, job losses, destruction of civil and religious liberty, and population reduction, fit very nicely into the wicked schemes of the Jesuit/papal agenda. ‘Vowed to perpetual poverty and humility, it was their studied aim to secure wealth and power, to be devoted to the overthrow of Protestantism, and the re-establishment of the papal supremacy.’ GC, pg. 234 There is but one more piece to this puzzle and that is the reestablishment of papal supremacy. The last three popes have made very clear what the final piece will be in making the entire world Catholic. When the final piece of the puzzle will be implements, only the God of heaven knows. But what the final piece will be; well, there is no doubt.

All Chapters of The Coronavirus by Bill Hughes.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes. When you see emphasis with “(emphasis added)” following, they’re the author’s emphasis. In places where you see emphasis without “(emphasis added)” following, they are my emphasis.

CHAPTER 8
PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY

New evidence has recently been discovered relevant to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy that will show who actually planned and carried out his murder. This new evidence will show that the Warren Commission report, which is the government’s final word on the assassination, is a complete cover-up of what actually took place. The following analysis of the assassination will include several events and situations that might not appear to be related to this murder, but will show the extensive intrigue behind it.

While riding in an open motorcade, President Kennedy was shot in Dealy Plaza on Friday, Nov. 22, 1963 at 12:30 p.m. The crowds were cheering. There was a great scene of rejoicing as the president of the United States made his way through downtown Dallas. It seemed as if everyone was smiling in those waving thousands. But presently, shots rang out, and President Kennedy, a short while later, lay dead at the Parkland Memorial Hospital.

This case has baffled people for the last four decades, and is one of the ten most unsolved mysteries of the last one hundred years. The Warren Commission was set up to investigate the assassination, and they concluded that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, did it. They claimed that Oswald shot President Kennedy from the Dallas Book Depository building behind his car. But there is rather overwhelming evidence now that disproves the Warren Commission report and points to a massive cover-up and conspiracy behind the assassination. Two days after President Kennedy’s death Jack Ruby murdered Oswald. Why? Was it to keep him from talking?

There were basically two main reasons why Kennedy was assassinated. These reasons are involved with the Vietnam War, and the Federal Reserve Bank.

President Kennedy sent two aides to Vietnam, McNamara and Taylor, who gathered intelligence that convinced him that the United States needed to withdraw from Vietnam. Their memo to the president was entitled, Report of McNamara-Taylor Mission to South Vietnam.

Fletcher Prouty tells us that,

As President Kennedy began to de-escalate American involvement in Southeast Asia, this superpower group was planning his murder. Following Kennedy’s assassination, they made sure that America would remain in Vietnam for a long time.

Who was this group? Who wanted us in South Vietnam and why? When we answer these questions, the people behind the assassination of JFK will be known.

Avro Manhattan was a British journalist who worked for many years for the British Broadcasting Company. He has written at least 15 books on the role of the Roman Catholic Church in world affairs. In his book, Vietnam: Why Did We Go?, he tells us,

The publisher’s foreword to this book, page 3, states:

Many, especially Catholics, may take exception to the facts stated in the previous quotes, but we must present the facts as they are and as they happened. When this book talks about the Catholic Church, it is not speaking of the faithful church members who know nothing about things like this. It is speaking of the rulers of the Vatican and their Order of the Jesuits.

According to Avro Manhattan, the war in Vietnam was fought because the Vatican wanted to create a power base in Southeast Asia from which to take over all of Southeast Asia and then all of Asia. The following quotes are from this same book.

Cardinal Francis Spellman, the archbishop of New York, was the key man that brought America into the conflict.

The Vatican played both sides against each other in this Vietnamese Civil War. They controlled Diem in the South while advising and making secret deals with Ho Chi Minh in the North. Thus, however the war turned out, the Vatican would triumph and have control in Vietnam. President Kennedy’s attempt to halt the bloodbath incurred the undying wrath of the instigators of the war — the Jesuits of the papacy.

President Kennedy began to de-escalate America’s involvement in Vietnam shortly before his death. The day after his brutal murder, the following occurred:

The day after Kennedy was killed, the decision to stop America’s involvement in Vietnam was reversed and the Vatican’s program continued.

Morrow’s statement also revealed another reason for the Jesuits wanting to continue the war; they would make billions of dollars in the international drug trade. For the last four centuries, the Jesuits had been involved in the Far East drug trade and they certainly did not want to lose this opportunity, even if it meant the lives of millions of people!

The Jesuit controlled politicians in Washington wanted to continue the war in Vietnam. They wanted to create a Catholic power in Southeast Asia. They wanted to maintain their control of the international drug market that they had held for 400 years in the Far East. When President Kennedy stood in their way, he had to be removed. The Jesuits had John Kennedy assassinated.

The second reason for Kennedy’s assassination was his intention to eliminate the Federal Reserve. Colonel James Gritz explains,

President Kennedy was attempting to dismantle the Federal Reserve System, which is the central bank of the United States, a creation of the Jesuits.

The Constitution of the United States gives to Congress the power to coin money. If the U. S. Congress coined its own money as the Constitution directs, it would not have to pay the hundreds of billions of dollars of interest that it now pays each year to the bankers for the national debt, for money that came out of nothing This is why Kennedy began to issue U.S. government money that was free of debt to replace the Federal Reserve dollars we have been using. We have seen in previous chapters who was responsible for the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank, and the unconstitutional operation of this bank that steals money from U.S. citizens. The Jesuits, if you will remember from chapter two, tried to assassinate President Andrew Jackson for discontinuing the central bank. They unfortunately succeeded in assassinating Kennedy for trying to do the same thing. The Jesuits uses the wealth created by the Federal Reserve to finance their murderous deeds.

John Kennedy incurred the deadly wrath of the Jesuits for daring to act as the President and not as their puppet.

But you say, “Wait a minute. Kennedy was a Roman Catholic. He was the only Catholic president we ever had.” (Until Joe Biden.) That is exactly right. Even though Kennedy was Catholic, he put the welfare of the United States before the desires of the papacy. He was not a Jesuit.

Here is a very interesting section from the secret instructions of the Jesuit Order, written by their founder, Ignatius Loyola.

We see here that if the Jesuit Order says that a person is to die, it doesn’t matter if it is your best friend, if it is your father or your brother; they are to be killed. What a dastardly, evil, and wicked system the Jesuit Order of the Roman Catholic Church is.

Do you think that the Catholic Church isn’t that powerful? Do you think this makes them out to be too strong? Avro Manhattan tells us:

Thus, through Cardinal Francis Spellman, the Roman Catholic Church and the Jesuits had access to and control over John Foster Dulles, the Secretary of State, and John Foster Dulles’ brother, Alan, who was the head of the Central Intelligence Agency. Those two departments, along with the FBI, were in the hands of Cardinal Francis Spellman, the head Cardinal of the Catholic Church in New York.

Jean Hill was also a witness to the Kennedy murder. In her book, entitled JFK: The Last Dissenting Witness, she states that during a conversation her friend, J.B., who was one of the policeman in the motorcade that was with Kennedy, told her,

So, the motorcade route through Dallas was changed, and the reason given was so that the people would have an excellent view of the president of the United States. The Jesuit assassins sure did!

Other peculiar things happened too. Lyndon Johnson, the vice president of the United States, was apparently having a real problem. Continuing with Jean Hill’s conversation with her friend in the motorcade,

Lyndon Johnson was acting as if he knew bullets would soon be flying, ducking down repeatedly before the shots went off.

Texas law prohibits people that die in the state of Texas from being removed without an autopsy. Leading doctors at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas were held at gunpoint as the body of John F. Kennedy was removed from that hospital without an autopsy. Why? There was overwhelming evidence that there was more than one bullet that killed JFK. There was overwhelming evidence that the Warren Commission report was nothing but lies. There were many bullets that the doctors would have found that would have shattered the idea that Lee Harvey Oswald was the loan gunman. That is why an autopsy was not allowed in Texas. That is why Kennedy’s body was shipped to Washington D.C. where a federal autopsy could be made, where they could fabricate the evidence to support the lies of the Warren commission. There was a Jesuit led conspiracy to kill JFK and they didn’t want the evidence to get out, no matter how many people had to be killed in the process.

If there really were several bullets fired that day in Dealy Plaza, then certainly the car would have contained evidence of this. And so it did.

Renas was the head of security for the Dearborn Division of Ford Motor Co. Who was the head of that division in 1963 that dispatched Renas for the task of his life?

Lee Iacocca was the man in charge of the Dearborn Division of the Ford Motor Company, who dispatched Carl Renas to go to Washington D.C. to get the car that JFK was in when he was assassinated. Iacocca was the head of the Dearborn Division until he became President of Ford Motor Company in 1970. Iacocca was part of the cover-up because he suppressed evidence concerning JFK’s assassination.

What connection does he have with the Catholic Church? In Iacocca’s autobiography he says,

Roman Catholic Lee Iacocca, head of the Dearborn division of the Ford Motor Co. was the one who dispatched Carl Renas to get the limousine that had the evidence of multiple bullets that were shot from multiple guns that killed John F. Kennedy. Isn’t it amazing that many years later as President of Chrysler, Lee Iacocca went to Congress and asked for financial help? Since Catholic Iacocca had been such an obedient servant to his Jesuit masters, another obedient Catholic by the name of Thomas ‘Tip’ O’Neill used his power as Speaker of the House to get Lee Iacocca all the money he needed.

There were many people who knew a great deal about the Kennedy assassination. Unfortunately, almost all of them died under mysterious circumstances. There was a concerted effort to be sure that no secrets were ever told. Even Jean Hill stated that several attempts were made to kill her and her children.

Kennedy was one of many Presidents, kings, Czars, and emperors who refused to obey the Jesuits and was killed for it. The role of the papacy in the heinous murder and cover-up of this crime cannot be denied. We have seen that the Vatican had a motive, the people in key positions to carry it out, and the people in key positions to cover it up.

Winston Churchill, the famous English Prime Minister during World War Two, once said,

We now understand the facts concerning one of the most controversial events in American history. Will you stumble over the truth here and go on as if nothing has happened or will you begin to analyze history and current events in a new light?

Continued from Chapter 3. Wuhan-Catholic Connection

Dr. Anthony Fauci’s bloody hands are all over the Wuhan Laboratory, the financing, planning, and implementation of spreading the coronavirus worldwide. His handlers, the Jesuits, have used this man to carry forward their global agenda. Is this the first time something like this has happened or are we just repeating history?……………………..

“Mengele was born in March 1911 into a wealthy Bavarian family, with a strict Catholic upbringing. He studied philosophy in Munich, where he encountered the racial ideology of Alfred Rosenberg. In 1931, at the age of 20, he joined the Stahlhelm (Steel Helmet), then the SA in 1933, and applied for party membership in 1937. Upon being accepted into the Nazi party, he applied for membership in the SS. He later studied medicine at the University of Frankfurt, after which he joined the Institute for Hereditary Biology and Racial Hygiene in 1934. It was here that he developed his studies in physical anthropology and genetics. Prior to his arrival at Auschwitz, he had published significant articles on genetic abnormalities and racial variations in primary features. His career in academia looking bright, but the war interrupted his progress, and he was placed with reserve medical corps and a Waffen SS unit. Wounded, he was declared unfit for combat, but promoted to captain. An ardent Nazi, he served as medical officer with the Waffen SS during WW2, and was appointed chief doctor at the Auschwitz concentration camp where Jews were selected either for labor, extermination or medical experimentation.” History.co.uk

Mengele was born and raised in the Jesuit stronghold of Bavaria. Throughout the Reformation and to the present day, the power of the papacy maintained a stranglehold over Bavaria. Here, Mengele was nursed on the wicked principles of the Jesuits which led to his horrific crimes against humanity at Auschwitz!

“Josef Mengele was known as the angel of death. He was a medical doctor used by the Nazis during World War II to carry out the extermination of Jews at Auschwitz. He was notorious for many things as the following quote will indicate. “Second only to Eichmann as a target of Nazi hunters, the doctor nicknamed the “Angel of Death” conducted macabre experiments among the prisoners at the Auschwitz death camp. An SS officer, Mengele was sent at the start of World War II to the eastern front to repel the Soviets and received an Iron Cross for his bravery and service. After being wounded and declared unfit for active duty, he was assigned to the Auschwitz death camp. There, he used the prisoners—particularly twins, pregnant women and the disabled—as human guinea pigs. Mengele even tortured and killed children with his medical experiments.” ‘The Seven Most Notorious Nazi’s Who Escaped to South America’, History Channel, Dec. 27, 2017

From the above quote, it is obvious that Mengele exterminated hundreds of thousands of people. His cruelties led him to be known as the 2nd most notorious Nazi war criminal. He used prisoners as human guinea pigs, doing experiments on them in the name of science. Sounds like someone else we know; just like the medical madman inside the Beltway—Anthony Fauci!!

“Mengele, in distinctive white gloves, supervised the selection of Auschwitz’ incoming prisoners for either torturous labor or immediate extermination, shouting either “Right!” or “Left!” to direct them to their fate. Eager to advance his medical career by publishing “groundbreaking” work, he then began experimenting on live Jewish prisoners. In the guise of medical “treatment,” Mengele injected, or ordered others to inject, thousands of inmates with everything from petrol to chloroform to study the chemicals’ effects. Among other atrocities, he plucked out the eyes of Gypsy corpses to study eye pigmentation, and conducted numerous gruesome studies of twins. In 1943 he was appointed by Heinrich Himmler to be chief doctor at Birkenau, the supplementary extermination camp at Auschwitz, where he and his staff selected incoming Jews for labor or extermination and where he supervised medical experiments on inmates to discover means of increasing fertility (to increase the German “race”). His chief interest, however, was research on twins.” Wikipedia

Mengele was an arrogant man, hoping to advance his career at the expense of human beings. He killed children, pregnant women, and others to advance his great skills He was a butcher of human lives, caring not for anyone if they stood in his way of success. Do to his‘meritorious work’ at Auschwitz; Mengele escaped capture at the end of the war. How did the ‘Angel of Death’ escape?

“After World War II, Mengele spent three-plus years in hiding in Germany. In 1949, with the help of a Catholic clergy member, the “Angel of Death” fled via Italy to Argentina where he owned a mechanical equipment shop and remarried under his own name in Uruguay in 1958. The doctor lived in various Buenos Aires suburbs, but after hearing of Eichmann’s capture, went underground, first in Paraguay, then in Brazil. HOW HE ELUDED JUSTICE: West Germany had sent an extradition request to Argentina, which dragged its feet, claiming a review was necessary because the doctor’s crimes had been “political.” Nazi hunters pursued him for decades, but Mengele ultimately drowned off the Brazilian coast in 1979, felled by a stroke. Because he had operated under an assumed name in Brazil, his death wasn’t verified until his remains were forensically tested in 1985.” ‘The Seven Most Notorious Nazi’s Who Escaped to South America’, History Channel, Dec. 27, 2017

The documents – which are discussed in Steinacher’s book ‘Nazis on the Run: How Hitler’s henchmen fled justice’ – offer a significant insight into Vatican thinking, particularly, because its own archives beyond 1939 are still closed. The Vatican has consistently refused to comment. Steinacher believes the Vatican’s help was based on a hoped-for revival of European Christianity and dread of the Soviet Union. But through the Vatican Refugee Commission, war criminals were knowingly provided with false identities. ‘The Guardian’

“Ratlines” were a system of escape routes for Nazis and other fascists fleeing Europe in the aftermath of World War II. These escape routes mainly led toward havens in Latin America, particularly Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Colombia, Brazil, Uruguay, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, Ecuador, and Bolivia, as well as the United States, Spain and Switzerland. There were two primary routes: the first went from Germany to Spain, then Argentina; the second from Germany to Rome to Genoa, then South America. The two routes developed independently but eventually came together. The ratlines were supported by clergy of the Catholic Church all the way to the top, including Pope Pius XII!

That the Vatican Ratlines are a fact of history is confirmed by countless sources. ‘The Vatican against Europe’ by Avro Manhattan; Smokescreens by Jack Chick; and ‘Quest’ by Frank Brandenburg all detail very accurately the ratlines used by the Vatican to help escaped murderers, rapists, and thieves of the Third Reich escape to South America. Mengele, the medical madman inside the Nazi Regime was one of many! Mengele used his profession in the medical field to serve the purposes of the Catholic Church and the Jesuit Order. When someone works in a secular job and serves the Jesuits at the same time, he is called a Jesuit coadjutor. “And do Americans need to be told what Jesuits are?… they are a secret society, a sort of Masonic order, with super added features of revolting odiousness, and a thousand times more dangerous. They are not merely priests, or of one religious creed; they are merchants, and lawyers, and editors, and men of any profession, having no outward badge by which to be recognized; they are about in all your society. They can assume any character, that of angels of light, or ministers of darkness, to accomplish their one great end… They are all educated men, prepared and sworn to start at any moment, and in any direction, and for any service, commanded by the general of their order, bound to no family, community, or country, by the ordinary ties which bind men; and sold for life to the cause of the Roman Pontiff. — J. Wayne Laurens, The Crisis in America: or the Enemies of America Unmasked, G. D. Miller, 1855, pp. 265-267

Fauci, like Mengele in many, many ways, is serving the Jesuits through his profession and is a Jesuit coadjutor. The parallels between these two men are stunning.

•Both reared in Catholic homes.

•Both trained by the Jesuits.

•Both in the medical profession.

•Both have used their profession to kill hundreds of thousands of people.

•Both have been protected by their masters.

•Both had huge egos and sought to bring great glory to their church and themselves thru their work.

•One man died in infamy and unless he repents of his heinous crimes against humanity, the other one will as well!

Both of these men were raised on the adage that ‘the ends justify the means’. Their goal is the utter destruction of everything for which the Protestant Reformation stands and the reestablishment of papal power to universal control. In order to achieve this end, they will kill, maim, and destroy people’s livelihoods. It doesn’t matter how much pain they inflict; they could care less. They are human robots, without feelings, without compassion; hell- bent on the annihilation of anything that stands in their way and the goals of their despicable masters the Jesuits!

Through the course of this coronavirus pandemic, it has become clear to many that there are many more issues than this illness. Let us face the music; more people have died from the flu in one year than this virus has killed this year! So, why the hype? Is there something else? Is there an agenda behind the scenes? Would it surprise you if the very things the Protestant Reformation gave to us have been under grave attack since the breakout of this virus? The Jesuits have used this virus, put into action by their imp, to attack Protestantism’s strongholds. This will be the subject of the next chapter.

Continued in Chapter 5. Ultimate Goals

All Chapters of The Coronavirus by Bill Hughes.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes. It has some amazing insights, some things I didn’t know until today!

CHAPTER 7
WORLD WAR TWO

World War Two was the most extensive and devastating war in recorded history. Hundreds of thousands of people died in this war. Most people have no idea why this war was fought or what the cause of this war was. Wars do not just happen. They are planned and executed by people high in governments for their own advantage. President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” Let us take a look at who planned World War Two.

These are not the only reputable authors who implicate the papacy as the instigators of World War Two as well as all other wars. In light of these statements, it is sickening to hear of a recent meeting held in Assisi, Italy, where John Paul II was quoted as saying, “Violence never again! War never again! Terrorism never again!” The papacy has instigated, and is still instigating wars, and the pope has the audacity to make that statement!

America is currently conducting a war on terrorism. The above statements indicate that the papacy is responsible for making this war on terrorism necessary.

George Bush declared in USA Today, September 17, 2001, that his administration is preparing a crusade against terrorism. In past history, crusades were religious wars fought on behalf of papal interests. Was president Bush telling us that his war on terrorism is being fought to further papal interests?

Adolf Hitler was guilty of all kinds of atrocities during the Second World War. Was he really responsible for these atrocities, or was he simply carrying out orders? Consider who was pulling the strings in Hitler’s Germany.

What an amazing statement. Von Papen says that the atrocities that Hitler perpetrated during the Second World War were the ‘principles’ of the papacy! Can there be any doubt that the papacy is just as evil as was Hitler and his regime?

An accurate account of history places the Catholic-Jesuit menace at the very heart of the Hitler regime. It was Catholic von Papen and the Catholic Zentrum Party that got Hitler into power in 1933, and to show his gratitude, Hitler’s Third Reich was a model of papal principles at their worst. Hitler was merely a pawn in the hands of the Jesuits of the papacy.

Who supported Hitler in war ravaged Germany? Remember, Germany had been reduced to rags by World War One and the heinous Treaty of Versailles.

As we saw in a previous chapter, the Federal Reserve Bank was a creation of the Jesuits. They use it to finance their insane puppets like Adolf Hitler. Kenan states that the Federal Reserve financed Hitler and the Nazis. If the Federal Reserve Bank is controlled and run by Americans, how could it finance a deadly enemy like Hitler, who stood for everything that the Constitution condemns? In light of Kenan’s statement, the Federal Reserve Bank is not American; it is our enemy, financing our enemies. Thus it makes sense that the Jesuit controlled bank would fund a Jesuit controlled puppet like Adolph Hitler.

From Jesuit controlled Germany under Hitler, let us turn to the country of Spain and Francisco Franco. Spain was going through convulsions toward the end of the 1800s. She went back and forth between a Roman Catholic monarchy and an attempt at free republican government. Finally, in the 1930s, bodies of babies were discovered under several convents in Spain. Doctors discovered that these infants had died as the result of suffocation. You see, nuns and priests had engaged in adultery, and the unwanted babies were killed at birth. The Catholic people of Spain, who knew nothing of these awful crimes, were outraged by the discoveries, and many laws were passed that hindered the papacy’s power in Spain. According to ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera:

Benito Mussolini was highly esteemed by the Jesuits of Rome. He was their man of providence, who restored Vatican City to the papacy in 1929.

According to Pius XI,

We read a previous quote that said that Hitler put into practice the ruthless principles of the papacy. Now we see that Mussolini did the same thing. It wasn’t just the three axis powers of Europe, with their Catholic puppets, that did Rome’s bidding during World War Two. Franklin Roosevelt, President of the United States, also carried out Rome’s wishes.

Spellman’s first allegiance was to Pope Pius XII, and yet, he was used by Franklin Roosevelt as his own personal agent.

Of Roosevelt, we read again,

Roosevelt not only used Spellman as his agent, but he carried out the Jesuits’ goal of annihilating as many Orthodox Christians as possible. The Jesuits sought to destroy the Orthodox Christians of Serbia in World War One, and with this repatriation at the end of World War Two, they destroyed many more millions of Russian Orthodox Christians. Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and Churchill carried out the Jesuits bloody plan with considerable success.

While the Orthodox Christians of Russia were being exterminated by the papacy, there was a similar massacre going on in Yugoslavia. Some of the many books that have been written about this atrocity of World War Two include Convert… or Die! by Edmond Paris, The Vatican’s Holocaust by Avro Manhattan, and Ravening Wolves by Monica Farrell. These books all discuss the murder of around one million Orthodox Christians during World War Two by the Catholic Ustashi. On the cover of Farrell’s book, we read,

The papacy was still trying to exterminate Orthodox Christians in Serbia in the late 1990s. The papacy used the United States as their bully in that conflict to bomb Serbia. The real butcher of the ‘Balkins’ is the pope and the Catholic Church, not Slobodan Milosevic. They are trying the wrong person for war crimes.

Another Jesuit goal of World War Two was to make things so bad for the Jewish race that they would want to return to Palestine. Near the end of World War One, the Balfour Declaration was signed enabling the Jews to go back home to Palestine. This was to be their permanent home. However, many Jews had found success in various parts of the world and did not want to return. When World War Two and the Jewish Holocaust occurred, the persecuted Jews longed for a place to call home, and many returned to Palestine. In 1948, Israel was declared to be a sovereign nation. According to Cooney’s book, The American Pope, page 187, Francis Spellman had been the deciding factor in getting Israel accepted as a sovereign state.

Why would the Jesuits use Hitler to annihilate the Jews, and then have Jesuit Cardinal Francis Spellman provide a home in Palestine for them? Watch carefully. The Vatican has sought to destroy the Jews for a thousand years.

On the surface the nation of Israel in Palestine seemed to be a grand opportunity for the Jews to be able to have their own country. However, what has been the result of the Jews returning to Palestine? Since they were granted sovereign status in 1948, the Jews have been in one ravaging battle after another with the Arabs. Many Jews have died, just as the Jesuits hoped and knew would happen.

With the Jews’ return to Israel in Palestine the Jesuits hoped to cause such bloodshed in that part of the world that the world would cry out for a peacemaker to come to the region. And who would be that peacemaker? The pope of Vatican City, of course. The Jesuits have long wanted to restore the pope’s temporal power. When the pope is given Solomon’s throne in Jerusalem, the long-awaited goal will be accomplished. The war on terrorism that originated September 11, 2001, which George Bush calls a crusade, could certainly aggravate the trouble in that region to bring about the reign of the pontiff from Jerusalem.

The Jesuits failed in their attempts to have a world governing body following World War One. They accomplished their sinister goal after World War Two. Following the war, the weary, aching world was conditioned to accept an international government, and the United Nations was born. Since the creation of the United Nations in 1945, this so-called ‘peace-keeping’ body has failed miserably in keeping peace around the world. Why? Because keeping peace is not their purpose, even though they continue to claim that it is. There are presently some 83 different wars around the world. However, it has certainly been instrumental in suppressing liberty loving people. Katanga and Rhodesia are just two examples of nations crushed by U. N. forces. The United Nations has worked tirelessly to restore the temporal power of the papacy — its purpose from the beginning.

We will look at one more of the Jesuits’ purposes for World War Two. It was payback time for the Japanese. In the late 1500s, the Japanese had welcomed all foreigners who wanted to trade with her. Catholic missionaries had been welcomed too. After a time, the Catholic missionaries became intolerant of all other beliefs. Unrest and persecution resulted and Japan became a bloodbath for many decades. Finally, in 1639, the Exclusion Edict was passed. It stated:

For nearly two hundred years, the ports of Japan were closed to Jesuit missionaries, who had sought to take over Japan for the proud pope. Through the latter half of the 19th century, military power was used against the island nation. This softened her until the awful bloody conflict of World War Two in the South Pacific, culminating in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japan was brought to her knees — forever. Payback had come.

This is continued from Chapter 2. Conspiracy

What has been the story from day one in this coronavirus conundrum? The story has been thus, In the public mind, the origin story of coronavirus seems well fixed: in late 2019 someone at the now world-famous Huanan seafood market in Wuhan was infected with a virus from an animal. The rest is part of an awful history still in the making, with Covid-19 spreading from that first cluster in the capital of China’s Hubei province to a pandemic that has killed about 350,000 people so far (to the time this article was written0.

December 31-January 11, 2020

On December 31 last year, China alerted the WHO to several cases of unusual pneumonia in Wuhan, a city of 11 million people. The virus was unknown. Several of those infected worked at the city’s Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which was shut down on January 1. As health experts worked to identify the virus amid growing alarm, the number of infections exceeded 40.

On January 5, Chinese officials ruled out the possibility that this was a recurrence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) virus – an illness that originated in China and killed more than 770 people worldwide in 2002-2003.

On January 7, officials announced they had identified a new virus, according to the WHO. The novel virus was named 2019-nCoV and was identified as belonging to the coronavirus family, which includes SARS and the common cold.

On January 11, China announced its first death from the virus, a 61-year-old man who had purchased goods from the seafood market. Treatment did not improve his symptoms after he was admitted to hospital and he died of heart failure on the evening of January 9.

January 13 – 19, 2020

The WHO reported on January 13 a case in Thailand, the first outside of China, in a woman who had arrived from Wuhan.

On January 17, as a second death was reported in Wuhan, health authorities in the US announced that three airports would start screening passengers arriving from the city. Authorities in the US, Nepal, France, Australia, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Vietnam and Taiwan confirmed cases over the following days.

January 20 – 26, 2020

On January 20, China reported a third death and more than 200 infections, with cases also reported outside Hubei province including in Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen. Meanwhile, a Chinese expert on infectious diseases confirmed human-to-human transmission to state broadcaster CCTV, raising fears of a major outbreak as millions travelled for the Lunar New Year holiday. The cities of Wuhan, Xiantao and Chibi in Hubei province were placed under effective quarantine on January 23 as air and rail departures were suspended. By the end of the week, more areas were placed under lockdown affecting a total of 56 million people. The WHO said that the outbreak did not yet constitute a public emergency of international concern and there was “no evidence” of the virus spreading between humans outside of China.

January 27 – February 2, 2020

On January 30, the WHO declared the coronavirus a global emergency as the death toll in China jumped to 170, with 7,711 cases reported in the country, where the virus had spread to all 31 provinces. By the end of the week, China reported 304 deaths amid 14,380 infections. Within a few days, new cases were confirmed in India, Philippines, Russia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the US, the UAE and Vietnam.

On February 2, the Philippines reported the first death outside China, the victim being a Chinese man from Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province where the new coronavirus was detected in late 2019.

March 23 – 29, 2020

In the US, the White House and Senate leaders of both parties struck an agreement on March 25 on a sweeping $2 trillion measure to aid workers, businesses and a healthcare system strained by pandemic. By the end of the week, the US accounted for the highest number of coronavirus infections in the world, recording more than 124,000 cases and 2,000 deaths, more than double the figure two days before. Meanwhile, as the number of cases worldwide surpassed 600,000, with more than 27,000 deaths on March 27, India and South Africa joined the countries to impose lockdowns. Kenya, Kazakhstan and Honduras reported their first deaths, while Johnson announced he had tested positive. In Europe, Spain recorded 838 new coronavirus deaths over the previous 24 hours on March 29, marking the country’s highest daily jump in fatalities. The country was now second only to Italy where the death toll shot past 10,000 with 889 new deaths. (taken from Aljazeera, May 18, 2020)

The previous paragraphs make it very clear that the virus had its origins in Wuhan, China back in December. From this epicenter, the virus has now spread all over the world, killing hundreds of thousands of people and disrupting the lives of everyone on this planet. And you say, this has everything to do with Wuhan, China and NOTHING to do with the Vatican! That is very perceptive of you. Here goes……………………………..

“Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, warned members of the incoming Trump administration in January 2017 about the inevitability of a “surprise outbreak” of a new disease. He said at the time that the US needed to do more to prepare. “There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,” Fauci said during a speech at Georgetown University, adding, “The thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years.” Business Insider, April 13, 2020

How did Fauci know this? How did he know there would be a pandemic during the Trump administration? Isn’t Fauci a doctor? He sounds more like a prophet. , “The thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years.” Business Insider, April 13, 2020

The following two statements shed on light on how Fauci could be so sure that a pandemic would strike during the Trump administration. “Dr. Anthony Fauci, a member of the coronavirus task force, had previously backed funding for a controversial lab in Wuhan, China, that has been studying the coronavirus in bats, reports said. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases had shelled out a total of $7.4 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab — which has become the focus of theories about the origin of COVID-19, according to Newsweek. The National Institutes of Health, which oversees the NIAID, shut down all funding to the lab last week. “At this time, NIH does not believe that the current project outcomes align with the program goals and agency priorities,” a deputy director at the agency wrote in a letter obtained by Politico. There is “increasing confidence” among officials in the Trump administration that the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab is the original site of the virus. A report by Fox News said embassy officials warned in January 2018 about inadequate safety there. The NIH defended its funding of the lab in a statement to Newsweek.” April 29, 2020, New York Post.

Fauci’s organization, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, sent 7.4 million dollars to the Wuhan laboratory in China, knowing full well that they were studying the coronavirus in bats. If his organization sent 7.4 million dollars to the Wuhan lab, then obviously Fauci was backing the research to the hilt. He not only knew of the experimenting, but backed it with millions of dollars. Fauci also believes in the golden rule. The one who dishes out the dough makes the rules! If Fauci was doling out 7.4 million, would it be safe to say that, he being a medical expert in infectious disease, was also part of what went on at Wuhan? The writing on the wall says yes!! This information is shocking, tying Anthony Fauci to Wuhan and the coronavirus.

The final comment from Newsweek magazine goes even further. “Dr. Anthony Fauci is an adviser to President Donald Trump and something of an American folk hero for his steady, calm leadership during the pandemic crisis. At least one poll shows that Americans trust Fauci more than Trump on the coronavirus pandemic—and few scientists are portrayed on TV by Brad Pitt. But just last year, the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the organization led by Dr. Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health committed $3.7 million over six years for research that included some gain-of-function work. The program followed another $3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million. Many scientists have criticized gain of function research, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans, because it creates a risk of starting a pandemic from accidental release.

SARS-CoV-2, the virus now causing a global pandemic, is believed to have originated in bats. U.S. intelligence, after originally asserting that the coronavirus had occurred naturally, conceded last month that the pandemic may have originated in a leak from the Wuhan lab. (At this point most scientists say it’s possible—but not likely—that the pandemic virus was engineered or manipulated.) Dr. Fauci did not respond to Newsweek’s requests for comment. NIH responded with a statement that said in part: “Most emerging human viruses come from wildlife, and these represent a significant threat to public health and biosecurity in the US and globally, as demonstrated by the SARS epidemic of 2002-03, and the current COVID-19 pandemic…. scientific research indicates that there is no evidence that suggests the virus was created in a laboratory. The NIH research consisted of two parts. The first part began in 2014 and involved surveillance of bat coronaviruses, and had a budget of $3.7 million. The program funded Shi Zheng-Li, a virologist at the Wuhan lab, and other researchers to investigate and catalogue bat coronaviruses in the wild. This part of the project was completed in 2019.” Newsweek, April 28, 2020

Researching viruses in laboratories is highly criticized by scientists because of the possibility of the virus being leaked and causing a pandemic. This is exactly what happened in Wuhan. Dr. Fauci’s comments in 2017 would indicate that he knew that would be the case and warned it was coming!!! Was that part of his pre meditated plan to perfect a virus, pay for its research and perfection, and then have it leaked so that millions of people would die? Was Fauci already clear in his mind that once the virus was perfected in Wuhan that he would then have it released in order to infect millions? Was that why Fauci could speak with such arrogance in 2017 that a pandemic would hit the Trump administration? The three news sources that exposed this material are the Business Insider, the New York Post, and Newsweek! This material is shocking!

Why would Fauci pull such a stunt? What could possibly be his purpose or the purpose of those who control him? A little background on this reprehensible man provides the hidden clues. “His maternal grandfather, Giovanni Abys, was born in Switzerland and was an artist, noted for landscape and portrait painting, magazine illustrations (Italy) as well as graphic design for commercial labels, including olive oil cans. His grandparents emigrated from Italy to the United States in the late 19th century. Fauci grew up Catholic. Fauci attended Regis High School in Manhattan’s Upper East Side, where he captained the school’s basketball team and graduated in 1958. He then went to the College of the Holy Cross, graduating in 1962 with a Bachelor of Arts in classics. Fauci then attended medical school at Cornell University Medical College where he graduated first in his class with a Doctor of Medicine in 1966. He then completed an internship and residency in internal medicine at the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, now known as New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine.” So, Fauci is a devout Roman Catholic and attended the College of the Holy Cross. And what do we know about Holy Cross? Wikipedia says, “The College of the Holy Cross, or better known simply as Holy Cross, is a private Jesuit liberal arts college in Worcester, Massachusetts. Founded in 1843, Holy Cross is the oldest Catholic college in New England and one of the oldest in the United States. Opened as a school for boys under the auspices of the Society of Jesus, it was the first Jesuit College in New England. Today, Holy Cross is one of 28 member institutions of the Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities.” Wikipedia

Fauci used his profession to carry forward the global, papal/Jesuit agenda for the world. In a forthcoming chapter, we will see clearly what that agenda is. Fauci is not a calm, sensible man, but rather a cool, calculating medical madman in the Beltway!!

Continued in Chapter 4. Medical Madman in the Beltway

All Chapters of The Coronavirus by Bill Hughes.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes.

CHAPTER 6
WORLD WAR ONE

The heir to the Austria-Hungarian throne, Archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife, were in Sarajevo on July 26, 1914. As they made their way through the crowded streets in an open carriage, shots rang out, and both of them were dead.

The people of Sarajevo were predominantly Serbians. Their religious conviction was that of Orthodox Christians. Since the year 1054, the Catholic church has been waging war against the Orthodox Christians. Fifty years prior to the assassination, the Croatians, who are Catholic, were becoming extremely vocal about their hatred for the Serbians, who were a rival of Rome and needed to be exterminated.

Thus we see that the pope realized that if Austria-Hungary crushed the Serbs, then the Serbs’ Orthodox Christian brothers from Russia would enter the fray. Then Germany, France and others would join in, and you have World War One. The papacy was thrilled to see Russia enter the conflict. Russia was predominantly Orthodox and the papacy wanted the Orthodox Christians in Russia and around the world annihilated.

The papacy’s Jesuits had another reason for being so happy when Russia entered the conflict. It was payback time. About 100 years before World War One began, Alexander I, the Russian emperor, kicked the Jesuits out of Russia.

Five years later, Alexander was poisoned to death. The Czars were under Jesuit attack.

Alexander II broke all diplomatic ties with Rome in 1877 and even proposed a Constitution.

Finally, in 1917, the last Czar and all his family were murdered. Never again would a hated emperor from the House of the Romanoff rule Russia or ever again protect the Orthodox Church. Payback time had come.

Who was it that aided and financed the Russian revolutionaries in their takeover of Russia? Who backed Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin as they created revolution and bloodshed throughout Russia?

The instruments of this new alliance between the Soviets and the Vatican were to be the Jesuits, described as the hereditary enemies of the Orthodox Church. Reportedly, there were large numbers of representatives of the Jesuit Order in Moscow during the Revolution. — James Zatko, Descent into Darkness, University of Notre Dame Press, p. 111.

The actual Jesuit financiers of the Revolution were to be found in America.

Jacob Schiff was the principle Jesuit in America who was assigned the task of taking over the American banking system and establishing the Federal Reserve.

Since Schiff had control of the Federal Reserve Bank, he now had a source of money to finance the Communist Revolution in Russia.

In today’s money, that twenty million would be 420 million dollars, money essentially stolen from the American people through the Federal Reserve Bank.

Jacob Schiff was in control of the entire banking fraternity and was financing a government whose avowed principles are the direct antithesis of the United States Constitution. Schiff pretended to be an American capitalist. He was living in America, but his sole objective was that of the papacy: the ultimate destruction of America.

There were other goals that the Jesuits hoped to reach with World War One.

After World War One, an attempt was made to set up a one-world government, and the League of Nations was established. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge Sr. prevented the United States from joining the League of Nations. The Jesuits’ plot to create a one world governing body from which they could control the world, was stopped only temporarily. This part of the Jesuits’ plan had to wait another 27 years for a repeat performance, when the Second World War would result in the United Nations.

Before we look at yet another reason for the Papacy’s delight in the First World War, let us look briefly at president Woodrow Wilson. Wilson was controlled and dominated by Colonel Edward Mandell House. Wilson said:

Vierick says on pages 106-108 that while Wilson was running for re- election in 1916 on a platform of “because he kept us out of war,” House was negotiating a secret agreement with England and France, on behalf of Woodrow Wilson, that America would enter the war immediately after the election. House was also intimate with the power centers of money and power in Europe.

Another reason for World War One was to pay back Germany for its opposition to the papacy and the Jesuits in the 1860s and 1870s. Germany was the birthplace of the hated Lutherans. Twice during this time, Chancellor Otto von Bismarck led Germany (known as Prussia ) to military victories over the Jesuit-controlled countries of Austria in 1866 and France in 1870. Bismarck also outlawed the Jesuit order with the Kulturkampf law in 1872. These ‘crimes’ against Rome and the Jesuits had to be repaid in kind. Hence, many thousands of Germans were slain in the bloodbath of World War One.

Germany was also the country most affected at the end of the war. The victorious nations of Europe used the Treaty of Versailles to plunder Germany. The Treaty imposed such an unfair burden of war reparations on Germany, that when the French leader, Clemenceau, was asked by the press what the leaders had given the world by the treaty, he said, “We have guaranteed another war in twenty years.” The Germans agreed to the terms because they were weak and defeated, but they swiftly rebuilt and attempted to payback their enemies for the debt given to them after World War One. That payback was World War Two.

After World War One ended, the Jesuits did not get what they wanted. Woodrow Wilson and Edward Mandel House managed to get them the League of Nations, but it failed miserably because the United States did not join. Therefore another war was necessary, a war so devastating that the people would cry out for a united nations. This was one of the goals of World War Two. We will look at this and other reasons for World War Two in our next chapter.

Continued from The Coronavirus by Bill Hughes. Chapter 1. Deception

At the United Nations on November 10, 2001, United States President George W. Bush denounced the emergence of “outrageous conspiracy theories … that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.” Later, as media exposure of conspiracy theories of the events of 9/11 increased, U.S. Government agencies and the Bush Administration issued responses to the theories, including a formal analysis by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) about the collapse of the World Trade Center, a revised 2006 State Department webpage to debunk the theories, and a strategy paper referred to by President Bush in an August 2006 speech, which declared that terrorism springs from “subcultures of conspiracy and misinformation,” and that “terrorists recruit more effectively from populations whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods and corrupted by conspiracy theories.” Clearly, former President Bush is not happy with conspiracy theories. Since he isn’t, this has set a precedent among people that the idea of conspiracy is purely a theory and that there is no basis to it. Well………………………………………

George W. Bush attended Yale University and was a member of a Secret Society while there. The name of the Society was the Order of Skull and Bones. In order for Bush to become a member, he had to go through an initiation rite. In this rite, Bush vowed absolute obedience to three representatives. In the book, Codeword Barbelon by P. D. Stuart, it states that Bush bowed to the head of Freemasonry, the Pope, and the Jesuit General. Pages 339-341 declare this truth. Bush sold his soul to these entities and would do ANYTHING they told him to do. Any vows of loyalty to his country would mean NOTHING to a member of Skull and Bones. George Bush followed the leading of these powers while in the White House. Why would Bush speak out so forcefully against the idea of conspiracy was because he was part of a massive conspiracy?!

So, what of conspiracy? Is there really a conspiracy? Is it a theory or is it a fact? Is anyone who believes in a conspiracy a nut or is he right on the money? According to Webster’sdictionary, a conspiracy is “An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.

2. A group of conspirators.

3. An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.

4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: a secret plan to carry out an illegal or harmful act.

5. The act of making such plans.

Conspiracy – a secret agreement between two or more people to perform an unlawful act.

So, a conspiracy is two or more people or groups united together with a sinister purpose. Well, you say, there are so many voices out there. How do I know which one to trust that will be giving an unbiased view? Those are fair comments. The only unbiased, clear book that will give us the answer is the Bible. Revelation 17 and 18 answer this question of conspiracy very clearly if we are open to hear what it says. We are immediately confronted in these chapters with a monolithic power called Babylon the Great. “And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” Revelation 17:5 interestingly enough, the Protestant Reformers agreed on very little, BUT they all agreed on who Babylon the Great was. Listen to them speak.

Luther: “nothing else than the kingdom of Babylon and of very Antichrist. For who is the man of sin and the son of perdition, but he who by his teaching and his ordinances increases the sin and perdition of souls in the church; while he yet sits in the church as if he were God? All these conditions have now for many ages been fulfilled by the papal tyranny.” (Martin Luther, First Principles, pp. 196-197)

Luther: “Luther … proved, by the revelations of Daniel and St. John, by the epistles of St. Paul, St. Peter, and St. Jude, that the reign of Antichrist, predicted and described in the Bible, was the Papacy … And all the people did say, Amen! A holy terror seized their souls. It was Antichrist whom they beheld seated on the pontifical throne. This new idea, which derived greater strength from the prophetic descriptions launched forth by Luther into the midst of his contemporaries, inflicted the most terrible blow on Rome.” Taken from J. H. Merle Daubigny’s History of the Reformation of the Sixteen Century, book VI, chapter xii, p. 215.

Calvin: “But to conclude this point in a few words: I deny that See to be Apostolical, wherein naught is seen but a shocking apostasy — I deny him to be the vicar of Christ, who, in furiously persecuting the gospel, demonstrates by his conduct that he is Antichrist — I deny him to be the successor of Peter, who is doing his utmost to demolish every edifice that Peter built — and I deny him to be the head of the Church, who by his tyranny lacerates and dismembers the Church, after dissevering her from Christ, her true and only Head.—Calvin, “Tracts and Letters” vol 1, 219-220.

Knox: “Yea, to speak it in plain words; lest that we submit ourselves to Satan, thinking that we submit ourselves to Jesus Christ, for, as for your Roman kirk, as it is now corrupted, and the authority thereof, whereon stands the hope of your victory, I no more doubt but that it is the synagogue of Satan, and the head thereof, called the pope, to be that man of sin, of whom the apostle speaks.” (John Knox, The History of the Reformation of Religion in Scotland, p.65)

Knox: Knox wrote to abolish “that tyranny which the pope himself has for so many ages exercised over the church” and that the pope should be recognized as “the very antichrist, and son of perdition, of whom Paul speaks.” Taken from “The Zurich Letters” pg. 199 by John Knox.

Wesley: “The man of sin, the son of perdition– …in many respects, the Pope has an indisputable claim to those titles. He is, in an emphatical sense, the man of sin, as he increases all manner of sin above measure. And he is, too, properly styled, the son of perdition, as he has caused the death of numberless multitudes, both of his opposers and followers, destroyed innumerable souls, and will himself perish everlastingly. He it is that opposes himself to the emperor, once his rightful sovereign; and that exalts himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, commanding angels, and putting kings under his feet, both of whom are called gods in scripture; claiming the highest power, the highest honor; suffering himself, not once only, to be styled God or vice-god. Indeed no less is implied in his ordinary title, “Most Holy Lord,” or, “Most Holy Father.” So that he sits enthroned in the temple of God – Mentioned Rev. 11:1. Declaring himself that he is God, claiming the prerogatives which belong to God alone.—Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament, p. 216)”

Roger Williams: [speaking of the Pope, Williams said]: “the pretended Vicar of Christ on earth, who sits as God over the Temple of God, exalting himself not only above all that is called God, but over the souls and consciences of all his vassals, yea over the Spirit of Christ, over the Holy Spirit, yea, and God himself…speaking against the God of heaven, thinking to change times and laws; but he is the son of perdition (II Thess. 2).” The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, by Froom, Vol. 3, pg. 52.

Westminster Confession: ““There is no other head of the church but the Lord Jesus Christ. Nor can the pope of Rome in any sense be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin and son of perdition that exalteth himself in the church against Christ and all that is called God.” Taken from Philip Schaff’s, The Creeds of Christendom, With a History and Critical Notes, III, p. 658, 659, Ch. 25, sec. 6.

Cotton Mather: “The oracles of God foretold the rising of an Antichrist in the Christian Church: and in the Pope of Rome, all the characteristics of that Antichrist are so marvelously answered that if any who read the Scriptures do not see it, there is a marvelous blindness upon them.” Taken from The Fall of Babylon by Cotton Mather in Froom’s book, The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, Vol. 3, pg. 113.

All Reformers: “Wycliffe, Tyndale, Luther, Calvin, Cranmer; in the seventeenth century, Bunyan, the translators of the King James Bible and the men who published the Westminster and Baptist confessions of Faith; Sir Isaac Newton, Wesley, Whitfield, Jonathan Edwards; and more recently Spurgeon, Bishop J.C. Ryle and Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones; these men among countless others, all saw the office of the Papacy as the antichrist.” Taken from All Roads Lead to Rome, by Michael de Semlyen. Dorchester House Publications, p. 205. 1991.

According to the Reformers of the Protestant denominations, the papal power is Babylon the Great, the Mother of harlots; she is the antichrist and the man of sin, and she is seeking to rule the world one last time! Is anyone working with her in this effort? Revelation 17:2 and 18 record for us these insightful words, “With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.” Verse 18 says, “And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.” Wow! The political leaders of the world, be they dictators, prime ministers, presidents, premiers, or the like, the Bible says these political powers are puppets in the hands of the papacy! Rome herself has made this very clear in her own publications. ““Why, if the government of the United States were at war with the Church, we would say tomorrow, ‘To Hell with the government of the United States;’ and if the church and all the governments of the world were at war, we would say: ‘To Hell with all the governments of the world.’ Why it is the pope has such tremendous power? Why the pope is the ruler of the world. All the emperors, all the kings, all the princes, all the presidents of the world are as these ALTAR BOYS of mine.” Priest Phelan, Western Watchman, June 27, 1912, emphasis supplied. Pray, friend, as you never have before that political leaders would throw off the wicked shackles of Rome and stand in their God ordained positions!

Do we have a conspiracy yet? Remember, Webster’s told us that a conspiracy is ‘an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.’ So far, Revelation 17 and 18 have told us emphatically that we have a CONSPIRACY and that is a FACT! You can take that to the bank. Friend, you may say, “Oh, the leader of my country would never do ANYTHING bad and the Roman Catholic leadership are ALL fine men of God! How dare you say such things! I didn’t say them, Jesus did! The Lord Jesus loves you and me more than any leader or prelate. He would never lie to you! He wants to save you in His soon, coming kingdom.

Does it stop there? Is it just the papacy and the leaders of our world who are involved in a sinister plot to entrap us all in rebellion against the principles of Heaven? The Bible does not stop there. Revelation 18:11-15 declares, “And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more. The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble, And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men. And the fruits that thy soul lusted after are departed from thee, and all things which were dainty and goodly are departed from thee, and thou shalt find them no more at all. The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing…”

The merchants of the earth? The Bible says the merchants are those who buy and sell every commodity known to man. Those people who sell oil and have stores all over the world and trade worldwide. These are people that tell bankers what to do. The worlds wealthy remain rich as they are willing to sell their souls to Rome/Jesuits. Revelation 18:15 is clear; the papacy rules the rich. The international bankers go as the papacy bids her. While these wealthy people are ruled over by Rome, remember, these wealthy people control the media. So, the papacy/Jesuits tell the wealthy what they want in the media and the wealthy tell the media people what to say! This is all locked together in a global conspiracy!

Now, we have three entities tied together; the Papal power/Jesuits, the political power of earth, and the wealthy. With every word comes a wider enveloping conspiracy. Are there any other partners in this heinous plan against humanity? Well, Revelation 17:5 says, “And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” Well, the papacy is the Mother whore. Thus, a false church is identified as an impure woman. Then, the harlot daughters must be the churches today that are following in the footsteps of Rome! Alberto Rivera said that there aren’t any mainstream churches today that have not been taken over by Rome. “, all the mainstream churches were taken over by 1980. Dr. Rivera explained that when he was under the extreme oath of the Jesuits, he was told that a secret sign was to be given to the Jesuits world-wide when the ecumenical movement had successfully wiped out Protestantism, in preparation for the signing of a concordat between the Vatican and the U.S. “The sign was to be when a President of the U.S. took his oath of office facing an obelisk. For the first time in U.S. history, the swearing in ceremonies were moved to the West front of the Capitol, and President Reagan faced the Washington Monument. This happened January 20, 1981.” Jack Chick, The Godfathers, Alberto Part Three, Chick Publications, page 26 Is that why all churches today are silent on declaring the papal power to be the antichrist of the Bible? Is that why all churches today are involved in ecumenical gatherings where truth is destroyed and it is all about sacrificing historic beliefs of the past? Pray for men who will stand up and declare the truth of God! “The greatest want of the world is the want of men – men who will not be bought or sold; men who in their inmost souls are true and honest; men who do not fear to call sin by its right name; men whose conscience is as true to duty as the needle to the pole; men who will stand for the right though the heavens fall.” (Education, p. 57).

Now, we have four groups united together against God and His truth. The papacy/Jesuits, the political leaders, the wealthy, and the churches all together to rebel against the Lord Jesus and His truth. That is a conspiracy! Fact! There is one last thing Rome uses for her wicked purposes. “And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.” Rev. 18:24 History records for us that the papacy/Jesuits killed millions through time. Those who dared to follow the teachings of the Bible were hunted, slaughtered, split in two, and destroyed by Rome. The Inquisition was just one tool in her arsenal. However, the Bible says the papacy is responsible for killing machines that eliminate people. Killing machines like war, terror attacks; anything that leads to the deaths of millions of people rests at the footsteps of the Vatican! What about pandemics that kill millions, yeah, billions, before this thing is all over?

Are you saying that Rome/Jesuits had something to do with the current pandemic? Are you saying the papacy is behind this global tragedy that has killed hundreds of thousands of people to date? What an idiot you are; everyone knows it originated in Wuhan, China and that is the end of the story! We have been told by the media that it originated there and it did! Ah, but who was behind it? Who pushed the program in Wuhan that has caused a global tragedy? Are you ready to listen?

Continued in Chapter 3. Wuhan-Catholic Connection

All Chapters of The Coronavirus by Bill Hughes.

He was right way too many times for anyone not to take what He said seriously. Every single prediction He made came to pass. It would be very serious not to heed advice He may have for those living toward the end of the world. The Man referred to is Jesus and this is His warning.

Jesus was at the end of His life and the professed people of God were plotting His life. He told them that their persistent rebellion would bring upon them destruction. Jesus said, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. For I say unto you, ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.” Matthew 23:37-39 In these tragic words, Jesus told the Jews that their temple would be destroyed. This was a most stunning thing to predict, but He had been right too many times before to not take Him very, very, seriously.

Herod’s temple was a wonder of the ancient world. White marble in appearance, it had the look of being impregnable. However, Jesus said it was coming down and down it came in 70AD before the onslaught of Titus and the Romans. Among those who were most stunned by what Jesus said were His disciples. Shortly after this, Jesus reiterated what He had already said, saying, “See ye not all these things? Verily I say unto you, there shall not be left here one stone upon another that shall not be thrown down. And as he sat upon the Mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying; tell us, when shall these things be? And what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?” Matthew 24:2, 3

The disciples were convinced that when the temple was destroyed Jesus would come the second time to this earth. They put the two events together. However, the two events didn’t happen at the same time. The temple was destroyed in 70 AD and Jesus has yet to come the second time. When answering the disciples two fold question, Jesus only gave one answer. That means that what He said applies not only to the events to take place around the destruction of the temple, but the same events would occur just before His Second Coming! That means that what Jesus said has a double application. What Jesus said had meaning for the people living around 70 AD and His words have meaning for us today!

What did Jesus tell us? Here we go, “And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in diver’s places.” Matthew 24:4-7 Twice in those verses, Jesus told us to watch out for deception. In Matthew 24:11, we read, “And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.” Finally, in Verse 24, Jesus said, “For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.”

Whenever Jesus wanted to stress something, He would say, “Verily, verily, I say unto you.” He would repeat verily twice for emphasis. In Matthew 24, for those living at the end of earth’s history, Jesus repeated a word four times, and said, “You better watch out. DECEPTION will be so thick you could cut it with a knife. Watch out what you are told! Beware!”

Now, before going any further, let us be very clear on what deception is. Webster’s dictionary tells us, deception is “deceitfulness , duplicity, double-dealing, fraud, trickery”. Let me illustrate this for you from an experience I had when I was in the eighth grade. My junior high school had a flag football team. On our championship team, we had one play that always scored a touchdown. The reason it was so successful was because we used deception. Let me explain briefly. The flanker would spread out wide to the right of the formation. As the quarterback, me, called the signals, he would come in motion back toward me. By the time I said three, he was close in proximity to me. I would turn, lateral the ball to him, and then my two backs, Brian and Bill, would block around the left end. We ran this play twice on first and second down.

On third down, we did the identical thing. As I started calling the signals, the flanker, Kevin, would start toward me. The other team KNEW exactly what we were going to do. They started moving toward the side of the field where they KNEW Kevin would be shortly. In fact, they started smiling at me as they moved over to the side, waiting for what would SURELY occur. Well, I pitched the ball to Kevin and we started around the end as always, EXCEPT for one thing. My speedy halfback, Brian, didn’t go to block. He reversed his field, took the ball from Kevin’s outer hip, and made his way down the opposite sideline where nobody was. The other team pulled Kevin’s flags and was so happy with themselves, figuring they got us. All the time, Brian was running down the opposite sideline for a touchdown.

It worked to perfection. We had deceived the other team into believing that Kevin would carry it again around the corner, and while they were so happy, the real play was happening in a totally different area. The other side of the field was where things were happening and the other team didn’t know that! They were deceived, faked out, and tricked! And, Jesus said this would be happening down toward the end of earth’s history! He told us to watch out. While everything is being focused and centered on something, the REAL events are happening in another area of the world. Could that be happening to us today? Is the coronavirus, in which many people are tragically dying, being used today by certain powerful groups in our world to bring about their agenda? While everyone focuses on this virus, are other things happening in our world that could lead to terrible results for everyone on this planet?

Jesus told us, “Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.” Matthew 24:4, 5 He has been right too many times to not take what He says very, very, seriously. Now, let’s weigh something for a moment. Where do we receive most of our information today? What mechanisms are used to communicate to people in the timeliest manner and to reach the most people at once? Clearly, the media is what is used very effectively to communicate to the populace. We get the great bulk of our messages of communication from the television, the radio, newspapers, magazines, and the internet. Is it possible that the media we are listening to is controlled by powerful people behind the scenes? Is it possible that these power groups are dictating what people are told in order to help the masses embrace an agenda? You know, I grew up on Walter Cronkite and David Brinkley and thought they were the finest of men. I’m sure many of us feel the same about David Muir, Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos and Diane Sawyer today.

With Jesus’ warning ringing in our ears and the undeniable fact that media is the way we receive messages today, a statement by John Swinton hits us square between the eyes. Swinton was a preeminent journalist over a century ago. Swinton declared at a press club dinner in his honor, “There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” (Source: Labor’s Untold Story, by Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, published by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.)

The quote raises the issue of whether there is not continuing truth in Swinton’s remarks, and whether some candid journalist might not be able to fairly say similar things today. Anyone who has associated closely with journalists can hardly avoid finding a ring of truth in such words, and the best evidence lies in the actual product of journalists and how well, or how poorly, it both agrees with and covers what actually happens, especially involving such things as corruption and abuse of power. Swinton declared that journalists are the tools of rich men behind the scenes. The journalists are puppets in the hands of the wealthy that control them. In order to save their job, the journalist or anchor will readily lie, deceive (there is that word), say whatever they are told in order to guide people down the path of their handlers-the wealthy of the world! Just one example of this would be the control of media by one Rupert Murdoch. His holdings over the media of this world are staggering.

So, does the world‘s wealthy have an agenda for the populace of this world? Are they using their wealth and power to communicate to this planet what they want them to know about this virus in order to carry out their agenda for this world? Are their powers above the wealthy people of the world who also have global agendas and the coronavirus is part of finalizing their plans? Does this sound like a conspiracy to you? People shy away from conspiracy today, poo pooing it as conspiracy theorists. Probably just some cuckoo heads. We will look at this in our next chapter. Jesus warned us about deception. I hope we are listening.

Continued in Chapter 2. Conspiracy

All Chapters of The Coronavirus by Bill Hughes.

This article is from The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes.

William Henry Harrison was elected to the Presidency of the United States in the year 1841. He was already well up in years at 67, but he was very healthy and robust. All who knew him felt that he would have no problem going through his full four years in office. However, just thirty-five days after taking the oath of office, President Harrison was dead on April 4, 1841. Most, if not all, encyclopedias will tell you that he died of pneumonia after giving his inaugural address in the severe cold of Washington, D.C., but that is not correct. He did not die of pneumonia.

When Harrison came to office a very tense situation existed in the country. Trouble was brewing between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. There was contention over the annexation of Texas, whether it would be admitted free or slave. An attempt had been made on President Jackson’s life just six years before. Harrison took office a short twenty years before the Civil War. The influence of the Jesuits was weighing heavily upon America.

As we have already seen, the Congresses at Vienna, Verona, and Chieri, were determined to destroy popular government wherever it was found. The prime target was the United States and the destruction of every Protestant principle. The despicable Jesuits were ordered to carry out this destruction.

Andrew Jackson faced the onslaught of the Jesuits via the political mine fields of John C. Calhoun and the financial wizardry of Nicholas Biddle. William Henry Harrison had also refused to go along with the Jesuits’ goals for America. In his inaugural address he made these comments:

“We admit of no government by divine right, believing that so far as power is concerned, the beneficent Creator has made no distinction among men; that all are upon an equality, and that the only legitimate right to govern, is upon the expressed grant of power from the governed.” — Burke McCarty, The Suppressed Truth About the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, Arya Varta Publishing, p. 44.

By that statement, President Harrison had just incurred the deadly wrath of the Jesuits.

With these unmistakable words President Harrison made his position clear; he hurled defiance to the Divine Right enemies of our Popular Government. [Burke McCarty is talking about Rome when she says that.] Aye, he did more — for those were the words that signed his death warrant. Just one month and five days from that day, President Harrison lay a corpse in the White House. He died from arsenic poisoning, administered by the tools of Rome. The Jesuit oath had been swiftly carried out:

“I do further promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage, relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate them and exterminate them from the face of the earth…. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poison cup regardless of the honor, rank, dignity or authority of the person or persons… whatsoever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by an agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith of the Society of Jesus.” — Ibid. pp. 44, 46.

For nearly a thousand years, the Roman Catholic popes felt that they ruled by divine right, that their power had come directly from God, and that all men were to bow to their authority and control. If a ruler would not submit his position and the country he ruled into the hands of the Pope, then that person had no right to rule. When Harrison stated that, “we admit of no government by divine right,” he was declaring that he and the United States were in no way going to submit to the pope’s control. To the pope and his heinous Jesuits, this was a slap in the face that they felt must be dealt with immediately.

It was not Harrison alone that had rejected Rome’s authority, for he was simply stating what the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution had declared before him. Our Republic totally refused the control that the pope and the Jesuits were trying to apply. When a nation, church, or individual, refuses to submit to the authority of the papacy, they are finished. Unless God intervenes, the lives of those opposing the papacy will be terminated.

This concept is completely foreign to the thinking of people who have lived under a free, constitutional government. The inalienable rights to worship God according to the dictates of one’s own conscience and a government without a king, are taken for granted in the United States today. We don’t realize that Harrison’s statement was a dagger aimed at the heart of the papacy’s existence.

Another ruler who refused to be dictated to by the papacy was Queen Elizabeth of England. She was one of Henry the Eighth’s daughters and ruled England from 1558 to 1603. She ascended the throne following the death of her half-sister, ‘Bloody Mary,’ who ruled England from 1553 to 1558. Mary had been a Catholic sovereign, but Elizabeth was a Protestant.

Queen Elizabeth wisely rejected the assumed ‘Divine Right’ of the papacy to rule over and control the throne of England. Because of this there were at least five attempts to assassinate her. These attempts all failed because she had a superb secret service group, and her life was saved.

When the papacy realized that all their efforts to assassinate Elizabeth had failed, they turned to one of their Catholic sons, Phillip the Second of Spain. In 1580 the papacy arranged for Spain to invade England.

The famous Spanish Armada was sent to crush England because Elizabeth would not give her throne and kingdom to the pope. For thirty years, the Jesuits tried to kill Elizabeth, but failed. Finally, they conspired with Phillip the Second of Spain to annihilate her with the Armada.

Likewise, as William Henry Harrison took his oath to become the President of the United States, the Jesuits saw a man that openly opposed them and their plans. Unfortunately, President Harrison was poisoned just thirty five days into his term of office.

United States Senator Thomas Benton concurs.

William Henry Harrison became the first president to fall a victim of the Jesuits in their attempt to take over the United States, destroy the Constitution, and install the papacy as the supreme ruler in America. If any U.S. President or any other leader refused to take orders from the Jesuits, they too, would be targets of assassination. Zachary Taylor refused to go along with the destruction of America and he was the next to fall.

Taylor was known as a great military man. His friends called him ‘Old Rough and Ready.’ He came to the White House in 1848 and sixteen months later, he was dead.

Here is what would have happened if Zachary Taylor had invaded Cuba. There was Catholic Austria, Catholic Spain, Catholic France and England all waiting, ready to do battle with the United States of America if he had invaded Cuba. What chance would this young republic have had against the united powers of Catholic Europe at that time? The papacy well understood this and that is why they pushed Taylor so hard to invade.

Taylor committed another ‘crime’ against Rome. He spoke passionately about the preservation of the Union. The Jesuits were striving hard to split the nation in two, and the President was trying hard to keep it together. Jesuit agent, John C. Calhoun, visited the Department of State, and requested the president to say nothing in his forthcoming message about the Union. But Calhoun had little influence over Taylor, for after his visit the following remarkable passage was added to Taylor’s speech,

“Attachment to the Union of States should be fostered in every American heart. For more than half a century during which kingdoms and empires have fallen, this Union has stood unshaken…. In my judgment its dissolution would be the greatest of calamities and to avert that should be the steady aim of every American. Upon its preservation must depend our own happiness and that of generations to come. Whatever dangers may threaten it, I shall stand by it and maintain it in its integrity to the full extent of the obligations imposed, and power conferred upon me by the Constitution.” — John Smith Dye, The Adder’s Den, pp. 51, 52.

McCarty picks up the story from here,

Six years later James Buchanan, a Pennsylvania Democrat, was elected president. James Buchanan had wined and dined with the Southerners and it appeared as though he would go along with their desires.

James Buchanan didn’t have to wait long to find out what the Jesuits would do to him for double-crossing them.

James Buchanan was poisoned and almost died. He lived because he knew that he had been given arsenic poisoning and so informed his doctors. He knew that the Jesuits poisoned Harrison and Taylor. The Jesuit Order fulfilled their oath again that they would poison, kill, or do whatever was necessary to remove those who opposed their plans. From 1841 to 1857, we saw that three Presidents were attacked by the Jesuits as outlined in the Congresses of Vienna, Verona, and Chieri. Two died and one barely escaped. They allow nothing to stand in their way of total domination of America, and the destruction of the Constitution. As they look at America the priests of Rome have stated, We are also determined to take possession of the United States; but we must proceed with the utmost secrecy.

When they say “Vicar of Jesus Christ” they mean the pope.

This article is from chapter 1 of The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes which is titled, Target America.

Quotes from Wikipedia:

The Congress of Vienna of 1814–1815 was a series of international diplomatic meetings to discuss and agree upon a possible new layout of the European political and constitutional order after the downfall of the French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.

The Congress of Verona met at Verona from 20 October to 14 December 1822 as part of the series of international conferences or congresses that opened with the Congress of Vienna in 1814–15, which had instituted the Concert of Europe at the close of the Napoleonic Wars.

Bill Hughes’ research is going to tell us what Wikipedia does not!

TARGET: AMERICA

The United States must soon face (I would say is now facing) the most deadly enemy it will ever have to face. This enemy is not only the usual military enemy, but it has the organization and the capability for massive espionage and clandestine operations within the United States. It uses a facade that is virtually perfect to hide its operations. In fact, right now, this enemy is working secretly to undermine the principles that made this country the greatest nation in the world. This enemy has infiltrated the highest levels and departments of the U. S. government, and poses an extreme danger to America. Let us look at a little history and understand the methods this enemy has used in the past and how it is secretly working today.

Europe was finally at rest. The Napoleonic Wars were now over, having lasted nearly 20 years. The brilliant and crafty Napoleon had spread Europe with the blood of her noblest sons. At long last, there was peace. In the aftermath, European sovereigns convened a general council in Vienna, Austria in 1814. This council has come to be known as the Congress of Vienna. The Congress continued its proceedings for one year, ending in 1815.

According to McCarty, the Congress of Vienna formed the Holy Alliance, whose primary goal was the destruction of all popular governments. Popular governments are those where the government allows its subjects to enjoy certain inalienable rights. Can you think of any popular governments that were establishing themselves in the world and granting their citizens certain inalienable rights around the year 1815?

Senator Robert L. Owen placed in the Congressional Record of April 25, 1916 the following statement, which shows clearly he thought the primary target of the “Holy Alliance” was the United States.

Senator Owen understood from the Congress of Vienna that the united monarchies of Europe would seek to destroy the great American republic and its blood-bought freedoms.

Senator Owen was not the only one who knew about this conspiracy against American freedom and the constitution. In 1894, R.W. Thompson, American Secretary of the Navy, wrote,

The sovereigns of the ‘Holy Alliance’ had massed large armies, and soon entered into a pledge to devote them to the suppression of all uprisings of the people in favor of free government; and he [Pope Pius VII] desired to devote the Jesuits, supported by his pontifical power, to the accomplishment of that end. He knew how faithfully they would apply themselves to that work, and hence he counseled them, in his decree of restoration, to strictly observe the ‘useful advices and salutary counsels’ whereby Loyola had made absolution the cornerstone of the society. — R.W. Thompson, The Footprints of the Jesuits, Hunt and Eaton, 1894, p. 251.

Thompson pinpointed exactly who would be the agents used by the monarchs of Europe to destroy the republic of America, namely, the Jesuits of Rome! Since 1815 there has been a continual assault on America by the Jesuits to try to destroy the constitutional rights of this great nation.

The famous inventor of the Morse Code, Samuel B. Morse, also wrote of this sinister plot against the United States.

The author undertakes to show that a conspiracy against the liberties of this Republic is now in full action, under the direction of the wily Prince Metternich of Austria, who knowing the impossibility of obliterating this troublesome example of a great and free nation by force of arms, is attempting to accomplish his object through the agency of an army of Jesuits. The array of facts and arguments going to prove the existence of such a conspiracy, will astonish any man who opens the book with the same incredulity as we did. — Samuel B. Morse, Foreign Conspiracy Against the Liberties of the United States, Crocker and Brewster, 1835, Preface.

The array of books written that detail the sinister plots of the Congress of Vienna and the Jesuits against the American Republic are numerous. That this conspiracy has raged since 1815 is a fact of history. We will show that this conspiracy is in full force today and that it is the reason America is having so many problems at the present time and is so close to losing her freedoms.

Most people know very little about the Pope’s Jesuits. The reason for this is that they are a very secretive society. In order to understand what the Order of the Jesuits is, please consider the following quotation.

The Jesuits function like the Papacy’s secret world-wide police. They are very secretive and go to great lengths to keep their operations secret. They tell no one that they are Jesuits. To all outside appearances, they appear as normal people. One last author will be cited here.

Ignatius Loyola founded the Jesuit Order in the 1540s. Its position in the Roman Catholic Church was solidified during the Council of Trent, which ran from 1546 to 1563. The Council of Trent was convened with one great goal in mind: how to stop the Protestant Reformation. The Reformation began in 1517 when Martin Luther, the fearless German friar, nailed 95 theses on the door of the Wittenburg chapel. These theses challenged, among other things, the heinous doctrine of indulgences taught by Rome that declared a man could save himself and loved ones by dropping enough coins into the Catholic Church’s coffers.

Luther’s great teachings that the Bible only is the standard for all doctrine and practice, and that a person is justified before God through faith in Jesus Christ alone, sent thrills through the hearts of thousands throughout Europe and shock waves through the halls of the Vatican.

Thus, the Council of Trent was convened to counter the Reformation; hence it is known as the Counter Reformation, and the Jesuits would be the chief tools of Rome to undo and destroy every trace of Protestantism wherever it was found.

America’s two greatest documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, are filled with Protestant declarations that are absolutely intolerable to the Jesuits of Rome. Does it surprise you that the Vatican condemns the founding documents of the United States?

The Vatican condemned the Declaration of Independence as wickedness and called the Constitution of the United States a Satanic Document. — Avro Manhattan, The Dollar and the Vatican, Ozark Book Publishers, 1988, p. 26.

Here is part of the Jesuit Oath.

I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver, but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the Militia of the Pope… I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and the wombs of their women and crush their infants heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus. — Edwin A. Sherman, The Engineer Corps of Hell; or Rome’s Sapper’s and Miners, Private Subscription, 1883, pp. 118- 124.

To think that a person would concur with such an abominable oath defies reason. One could not even imagine a more despicable oath. The word heretic in the above quote refers to anyone who disagrees with the pope.

In a letter from John Adams to then President Thomas Jefferson about the Jesuits we read,

Shall we not have regular swarms of them here, in as many disguises as only a king of the gypsies can assume, dressed as painters, publishers, writers and schoolmasters? If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell it is this Society of Loyola’s [the Jesuits]. — George Reimer, The New Jesuits, Little, Brown, and Co., 1971, p. 14.

Napoleon Bonaparte made this statement:

In the light of these statements, several questions arise. Since the Jesuits began a direct assault on America in 1815 and nothing stands in their way, then are the policies carried out today in America under the control of this despot of Rome? Have the assassinations of certain presidents, like Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, James Garfield, and William Henry Harrison, been Jesuit inspired? Have the atrocities, like Waco, Oklahoma City, and the destruction of the Twin Towers in New York City been planned behind the walls of the Vatican? What about our precious Constitution and the Bill of Rights that have come under such unrelenting attack in the past few decades? Is this the ultimate prize of the Jesuits to annihilate our precious freedoms that were purchased at so great a cost? Following chapters will analyze some of these very sobering questions.

As if the Congress of Vienna was not clear enough as to the objectives of the European monarchs and the Jesuit Order, there were two more Congresses that were convened.

The first of these was held at Verona in 1822. During this Congress, it was decided that America would be the target of Jesuit emissaries and that America was to be destroyed at all costs. Every principle of the Constitution was to be dissolved and new Jesuitical principles were to be put into place in order to exalt the Papacy to dominion in America.

The other meeting was held in Chieri, Italy in 1825. Here is what was decided there.

The goal of Chieri is clear; destroy Protestantism at any cost, and restore the temporal power of the Papacy — WORLDWIDE. As we watch John Paul II traversing the globe and being accepted worldwide as the “man of peace,” we can see how well the Jesuit plan, instituted at Chieri, is working.

These three meetings, at Vienna, Verona, and Chieri, were held with as much secrecy as possible. However, one man attended the first two meetings that would not be silenced. British foreign minister George Canning contacted the U.S. government to warn them that the monarchs of Europe were planning to destroy the free institutions of America.

The Monroe Doctrine was America’s response to the Jesuit’s Congress of Vienna and Verona. America would consider it an act of war if any European nation sought colonial expansion in the western hemisphere. The Jesuits have been able secretly to attack and infiltrate America to accomplish exactly what the Monroe Doctrine was stated to protect against. They have been able to get away with it because it was done with the utmost secrecy and under the facade of being a church. In a letter to President Monroe, Thomas Jefferson made the following observations:

Jefferson saw this as a great crisis in America’s young history because the wily and sinister Jesuits had been ordered to target America’s destruction.

The Monroe Doctrine challenged any advance on America by Europe. However, Monroe did not really understand that the crafty Jesuits would not initially use the force of arms to gain their objectives. They would use cunning, craftiness, and utmost secrecy. They would appeal to men’s basest points. They would plant their agents in positions of wealth and power and then use their influence to gain their great prize — the subversion and destruction of every Protestant principle as outlined in the Constitution of the United States.

This article is from chapter 2 of The Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes. It contains important history about the dealings of two men I never heard of before, John C. Calhoun and Nicholas Biddle, both Jesuit agents. This is suppressed history not taught in American educational institutions as far as I know. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

Frequent visitors to this website know how much I value true history. People who do not know history cannot possibly understand the present political situation in America or the world. They will only see what appears to be without a clue of who is behind it. George Orwell was quite insightful when he wrote,

“Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.”

Did Orwell figure that out on his own? Or could he have been an insider of some secret society that was in the know? Or maybe, like myself, he had access to some Jesuit-suppressed books! You decide.

THE SECRET TERRORISTS CHAPTER 2: PRESIDENT ANDREW JACKSON

Andrew Jackson was elected to the Presidency in the year 1828. His bravery and military skill in defeating the British in the War of 1812 are well known. He fought many battles in open combat, but now he was facing an entirely different enemy. This enemy claimed to be American just like him, claimed to want the best for America just like him, and occupied high positions of responsibility just like him.

The Jesuits were going to destroy America as determined by the sinister Councils at Vienna, Verona, and Chieri, and it was during the Presidency of Andrew Jackson that they began to apply their treachery in full force. These Jesuits moved among the American people and looked just like Americans. They were, in fact, American citizens, but their loyalty was to the pope of Rome. Their purposes were those of the papacy. These people were traitors and a serious threat to the continued existence of the United States.

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. — Marcus Cicero, speaking to Caesar, Crassus, Pompey and the Roman Senate.

Two of these traitors were John C. Calhoun and Nicholas Biddle..

Andrew Jackson won the Presidency in 1828 by a very wide margin. His Vice-President was John C. Calhoun of South Carolina. Calhoun realized that the love for freedom was very strong in the hearts of all Americans. He realized that slavery was rapidly being hemmed in because nearly all the territories purchased from Spain and France were made free. Without a continual expansion of slavery, it would eventually be defeated. In order to derail the current anti-slavery trends in America, Calhoun began a newspaper in Washington called the United States Telegraph. In this paper, he began to advocate the idea called States Rights.

The Doctrine of States Rights would lead inevitably to the complete abolishment of the United States. It presumed that a state had an inherent right to do whatever it wanted. Under the principles of States Rights, if a state wanted to secede from the Union, it could do so. This would eventually eliminate the United States.

Calhoun took a festering sore and turned it into the reason for the Southern states to secede from the Union. The festering sore was the high tariff placed on foreign imports, which made European goods more expensive. Since Europe bought large amounts of Southern cotton and other commodities the tariff meant that Southern merchants made less money for their exports. This tax helped Northern manufacturers because now, the Southern merchant would buy more from him.

Calhoun convinced the Southern states that they were getting a very bad deal and that they had the right to leave the Union over this issue.

The South, being an agricultural region, was easily convinced that a high tariff on foreign imports was injurious to them. He next undertook to explain to the South that these high duties were placed on specific articles, and was done, as special favor, to protect local interests. Thus he said to the people of the South, You are being taxed to support Northern manufacturers. And it was on this popular issue he planted his nullification flag… This new bastard democracy meant the right to destroy, peaceably or by force, (when ready,) the Federal Union. — John Smith Dye, The Adder’s Den, p. 22.

Shortly after Calhoun started his paper, there was a meeting called to honor the memory of Thomas Jefferson. At this meeting, Andrew Jackson was asked to speak. He arose and declared, “Our Federal Union. It must be preserved.” After saying this, Jackson sat down. Calhoun then arose and declared,

The Union next to our liberties most dear. May we all remember that it can only be preserved by respecting the rights of the States, and distributing equally the benefits and burdens of the Union. — Ibid. p. 19.

Calhoun put the Union second to our liberties. The union and the Constitution are what established our liberties. If the Union were dissolved, the States would be at each other’s throats just like the countries of Europe down through history. The resources of the states would be constantly used up, always preparing for war with each other. This was the objective of Calhoun and the papacy from the beginning. Their goal was to destroy the United States.

Calhoun used the tariff to create friction between the North and the South. Congress could have easily changed the tariff, so that was no reason for secession. Many spoke out against his underhanded methods. Daniel Webster said:

Sir, the world will scarcely believe that this whole controversy, and all the desperate means which its support requires, has no other foundation than a difference of opinion between a majority of the people of South Carolina on the one side, and a vast majority of the people of the United States on the other. The world will not credit the fact. We who hear and see it can ourselves hardly yet believe it. — Ibid, p. 25.

Daniel Webster knew that the issue went far deeper than a tariff. Calhoun was the Jesuit plant being used to split America in two!

John Quincy Adams in the House of Representatives declared:

In opposition to the compromise of Mr. Clay, no victim is necessary, and yet you propose to bind us hand and foot, to pour out our blood upon the altar, to appease the unnatural discontent of the South — a discontent having deeper root than the Tariff, and will continue when that is forgotten. — Ibid, p. 25.

Adams was correct in his observation. The tariff issue died, but the smoldering embers of division had split America in half. The blood of the Civil War can be traced back to the Jesuit, John C. Calhoun.

As we watch Calhoun seek to rend America in two, let us remember the words of ex-Catholic priest, Charles Chiniquy.

Rome saw at once that the very existence of the United States was a formidable menace to her own life. From the very beginning she perfidiously sowed the germs of division and hatred between the two great sections of this country and succeeded in dividing South from North on the burning question of slavery. That division was her golden opportunity to crush one by the other, and reign over the bloody ruins of both, a favored, long-standing policy. — Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Chick Publications, p. 291, emphasis supplied.

Calhoun was not a loyal citizen of the United States. He worked to advance the pope’s agenda. He seemed to be an American, but, was really a Jesuit in the pope’s army in the effort to destroy America.

Priest Phelan makes this statement.

Why, if the government of the United States were at war with the Church, we would say tomorrow, ‘To Hell with the government of the United States;’ and if the church and all the governments of the world were at war, we would say: ‘To Hell with all the governments of the world.’ Why is it the pope has such tremendous power? Why the pope is the ruler of the world. All the emperors, all the kings, all the princes, all the presidents of the world are as these ALTAR BOYS of mine. — Priest Phelan, Western Watchman, June 27, 1912, emphasis supplied.

John C. Calhoun was one of the papal altar boys, doing as he was told.

Andrew Jackson, in his message to Congress in 1832 stated this:

The right of the people of a single State to absolve themselves at will, and without the consent of the other states, from their most solemn obligations, and hazard the liberties and happiness of millions comprising this nation, cannot be acknowledged. Such authority is believed to be wholly repugnant, both to the principles upon which the General Government is constituted, and the objects which it is expressly formed to obtain. — John Smith Dye, The Adder’s Den, p. 25.

Jackson knew that Calhoun’s plot was devised to destroy the United States and its Constitutional liberties, and this was unacceptable to him. Jackson was standing in the way of the Congresses of Vienna, Verona, and Chieri, and the Jesuits had to deal with him.

Nicholas Biddle, another one of their agents, carried out phase two of the Jesuit attack. Biddle was a brilliant financier, having graduated from the University of Pennsylvania at the age of thirteen. He was a master of the science of money. By the time Jackson came to the Presidency in 1828, Biddle was in full control of the Federal government’s central bank. This was not the first time that a central bank had been established. Twice before, first under Robert Morris, and then under Alexander Hamilton, had a central bank been tried, but in both cases it had failed because of fraudulent actions on the part of the bankers who were in control. After the War of 1812, a central bank was tried again, and it was in this third attempt that we find Mr. Biddle.

Who was behind Nicholas Biddle and the attempt to have a central bank in the United States?

The instigators behind Biddle in his efforts to establish the Central Bank were the Rothschilds. For whom was the Rothschild family working?

Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked them up in Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title ‘Guardians of the Vatican Treasury’…. The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy absolute financial privacy and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? — F. Tupper Saussy, Rulers of Evil, Harper Collins, page 160, 161

The Rothschilds were Jesuits who used their Jewish background as a facade to cover their sinister activities. The Jesuits, working through Rothschild and Biddle, sought to gain control of the banking system of the United States.

Andrew Jackson was not happy with the central bank. When Biddle sought to renew the bank’s charter in 1832, President Jackson put his re-election bid on the line and vetoed Congress’ attempt to renew the charter. He vetoed it for three reasons. The bank was becoming a monopoly; it was unconstitutional, and it was a grave danger to the country by having the bank heavily dominated by foreign interests (the Jesuits).

Jackson felt that the very security of America was in danger from these foreign interests. He said:

Is there no danger to our liberty and independence in a bank that in its nature has so little to bind it to our country? Is there not cause to tremble for the purity of our elections in peace and for the independence of our country in war? Controlling our currency, receiving our public monies, and holding thousands of our citizens in dependence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than a naval and military power of the enemy. — Herman E. Kross, Documentary History of Banking and Currency in the United States, Chelsea House, pp. 26, 27.

Jackson’s comments were nothing new. Others understood the power wielded by those who ran the bank. Mayer Rothschild said:

Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws. — G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion Publishing, p. 218.

This is the Jesuits’/Rothschilds’ golden rule. The one who has the gold makes the rules!

Griffin then writes:

The Rothschild dynasty had conquered the world more thoroughly, more cunningly, and much more lastingly than all the Caesars before or all the Hitlers after them. — Ibid, p. 218.

Thomas Jefferson has this to say about the central bank.

A private central bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace to the liberties of the people than a standing army… We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. — Ibid. p. 329.

The Jesuits used Biddle and Rothschild to gain the upper hand in American banking because they knew they could then control the people and effectively re-write the Constitution according to papal law. Jackson was trying to stop them.

Let us take a closer look at the central bank and see why it is so dangerous. Most people do not understand the central bank, the Federal Reserve Bank. Here is a very simplified scenario that pretty much explains one of the operations of the Federal Reserve.

It is necessary to understand that the Federal Reserve Bank is not owned by the United States government as many believe. The central bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, is a private bank, owned by some of the richest and most powerful people in the world. This bank has nothing to do with the U.S. government other than the connection, which allows the operation described below. The Federal Reserve Bank has a total, government-enforced monopoly in money. Before we had the central bank, each individual bank competed with other banks; the customers, the consumers, got the best deal. Not any more.

We all know that today the United States government borrows money and operates under astronomical debt. Why is this? Common sense dictates that a policy of such enormous debt will sooner or later destroy the organization that practices it, because the interest on its debt must increase beyond its income, making payoff impossible.

Now to our scenario. Here, roughly, is how the operation proceeds. Suppose the United States government wants to borrow a billion dollars. The government issues a bond for this amount, much as a water company does when it wants to raise money for a new pipeline or a new dam. The government delivers this bond for the billion dollars to the Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Bank takes the bond and writes an order to the Department of Printing and Engraving to print the billion dollars’ worth of bills. After about two weeks or so, when the bills are printed, the Department of Printing and Engraving ships the bills to the Federal Reserve Bank, which then writes a check for about two thousand dollars to pay for printing the billion dollars’ worth of bills. The Federal Reserve Bank then takes the billion dollars and lends the billion dollars to the United States government, and the people of the country pay interest at an exorbitant rate each year on this money, which came out of nothing. The owners of the Federal Reserve Bank put up nothing for this money.

We see, therefore, that when the United States government goes into debt one dollar, a dollar plus the interest goes into the pockets of the owners of the Federal Reserve Bank. This is the largest, the most colossal theft ever perpetrated in the history of mankind, and it is so slick, so subtle, and so obfuscated by propaganda from the news media that the victims are not even aware of what is happening. You can see why the Jesuits want to keep this operation secret.

The Constitution of the United States gives to Congress the power to coin money. If Congress coined its own money as the Constitution directs, it would not have to pay the hundreds of billions of dollars of interest that it now pays each year to the bankers for the national debt, for money that came out of nothing. Money coined by Congress would be debt free.

Biddle responded to Jackson’s refusing to allow him to re-establish the central bank by shrinking the nations money supply. He did this by refusing to make loans. By so doing, he upended the economy and money disappeared. Unemployment ran high. Companies went bankrupt because they could not pay their loans. The nation went into a panic depression. Biddle felt he could force Jackson to keep the central bank. So confident was he that he publicly boasted that he had caused the economic woes in America. Due to his foolish bragging, others came out in defense of Jackson and the central bank died. It died until its re-establishment in 1913. It was re-established then by the same people, (Jesuits of Rome) for the same purpose of bringing America to her knees and planting the temporal power of the pope in America.

The Jesuits’ scheming for a central bank in America was temporarily stopped during Andrew Jackson’s presidency. He had opposed Calhoun’s States Rights doctrine, and he stopped Biddle’s attempt to continue the Central Bank. When other things fail, the Jesuit Oath declares that it is commendable to murder someone who stands in their way.

The President had earned the undying hatred of monetary scientists, both in America and abroad. [The Jesuits were furious.] It is not surprising, therefore, that on January 30,1835, an assassination attempt was made against him. Miraculously, both pistols of the assailant misfired, and Jackson was spared by a quirk of fate. It was the first such attempt to be made against the life of a President of the United States. The would-be assassin was Richard Lawrence who either was truly insane or who pretended to be insane to escape harsh punishment. At any rate, Lawrence was found not guilty due to insanity. Later, he boasted to friends that he had been in touch with powerful people in Europe who had promised to protect him from punishment should he be caught. — Ibid. p. 357.

The Jesuit Order was dead serious about taking over the United States. They infiltrated into government at the highest levels, and used their agents in controlling the American banking system. They would also use assassination when necessary to destroy any opposition to their plans. Andrew Jackson was almost assassinated by a Jesuit plant, who bragged of powerful Europeans, (the Jesuits) that would set him free in case he was caught. Other Presidents came along who also incurred the undying wrath of Rome. Several have been assassinated, and a few escaped certain death. The next chapter, which discusses the Presidencies of William Henry Harrison, Zachary Taylor, and James Buchanan, will fill in the details.

Continued from Part VI.Tyndale Perfected in English What Luther Created in German

PART TWO – The Greek New Testament
Fraud

Constantin Tischendorf dropped out of his university when his father died.

Figure 13 How did Sinaiticus get there? Aleph had no history before Tieschendorf “found” it.

Figure 14 Bishop Wescott combined Hinduism and Christianity. Hort preferred a Mary religion to a Jesus religion.

Figure 15 Erasmus rejected using Vaticanus, a codex without much of a history and lacked descendants.

Brief Summary

The second part of this book is more like a hastily produced crime drama, not at all elegant or certain, because the narrative involves the attempted murder – of the Bible. The evidence abounds but the facts are disputed, the heroes defamed, and the criminals deified. A young man had a great future, but his parents died while he was in the university. He had to drop out. His name was Constantine Tischendorf. He was able to work his way back into the school by lecturing, and that only served to renew his ambition. As a young professor, he managed to lay claim on Ephraim Rescriptus, a manuscript of the Bible overwritten, after being erased, by the little-known Ephraim. Tischendorf claimed to have unusual eyesight which enabled him to produce the original. His fame rested on his own boasts, so a Columbo might doubt most of it. The future events developed slowly, but they were pivotal for the attempt on the Bible from underneath the Ephraim layer of writing. If Ephraim was the first stage in launching his career, Sinaiticus was second stage, followed much later by Vaticanus. Tischendorf had a papal audience, very unusual for a German Lutheran, and saw his ability to travel and make pronouncements increase. He seemed drawn to a particular location, a monastery called “St. Catherine’s on Mt. Sinai,” but really a Disney Mt. Sinai, with an enormous history but with fake Biblical sights to see.

The first evidence of Tischendorf’s criminal attempt is the fable of his discovery of Codex Sinaiticus. Codex Sinaiticus means a bound book – codex – found there – Sinaiticus, at the ancient monastery of St Catherine’s, at a fake Mt. Sinai in Egypt. (Editor: Galatians 4:25 says Mt. Sinai is in Arabia.) He and his family told the same lie, time after time, and the lie was told to me.* He claimed to have found sheets of parchment loose in a basket, ready to be burned, as many sheets had before, but he intervened to save these remaining ones. The monks saved, repaired, and preserved ancient documents there, so using them as fuel was absurd. The oldest and most obscure works were valuable to the monks – and most importantly – to collectors. This was parchment – leather – and would stink in a fire and not heat anything. Constantine did not save but stole pages from the bound codex and presented the pages to a Roman Catholic ruler. He eventually stole the entire volume by promising to have it set in print in Russia, calling it Aleph, for the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet. He claimed it was 15 centuries old and promoted it as the greatest find in Biblical history.

* The professor neglected to say that no one would burn leather to warm a library, and none of us thought to ask. Parchment is animal skin while papyrus is paper. Do libraries burn 1500-year-old Bibles? We preserve ordinary books that old and carefully trace their ancestry and influence.

This codex and his look at Codex Vaticanus made him the hero of 19th century text criticism, a role which he carefully crafted for the Church of Rome and a sophisticated audience of rationalists, world- religionists, and Unitarians.

Scholars, clergy, and laity may debate the histories and origins of Sinaiticus (Aleph) and Vaticanus (B). One thing is clear – both books are barren and have no descendants. Such books would have been read and copied to death, producing new ones to be used by the faithful. Worn-out parchment (leather) copies would have been burned and the deluxe, costly leather copies used to produce accurate papyrus (paper) copies.

The Apostolic, Majority, Byzantine Tradition

The apostolic witness of the New Testament was preserved by the Christian Church. The thousands of manuscripts prove that to be true. The late copies from the Byzantine (Greek Christian) Empire simply show that the earlier copies were gone, used up, and burned to keep them from heretics. The term Received Text comes from a phrase by Erasmus when he first edited a Greek New Testament. The 1100 years-old Byzantine Roman Empire – Greek-speaking, Christian, almost forgotten by historians – preserved the Majority Text, which is also called the Ecclesiastical Text and the Traditional Text.*

* Stephens edited the Byzantine Text, so that edition is called the Stephanus, the edition which I use for all Greek New Testament citations in sermons, articles, and books.

Simple Math

Which is more likely the correct, apostolic text? On one side we have 5,000 or more witnesses in general agreement, given the slight variation from routine errors. We also know that early theologians quoted those Majority readings, and early translations used the faithful text. False teachers – heretics – erase what they do not like or believe, just as the RSV erased the Virgin Birth in Isaiah 7:10, moved it back, then erased it again in the latest version. Inserting false teaching is much harder than erasing sound material, because no one can run around adding the latest fad into hundreds if not thousands of ancient works.

Those who would erase the Woman Caught in Adultery (John 7) or the ending of Mark 16 (verses 9 and following) cry out, “Those verses do not fit what we expect them to say!” That is subjective and ridiculous. So, we have 5,000 witnesses in the Majority Texts, in as much agreement as humanly possible.* On the opposite side is the fraud of promoting Sinaiticus as the “World’s Oldest Bible” and Vaticanus as another treasure, as if Rome ever cared about the Scriptures, the Gospel, or the truth. The two great codices do not agree with each other, and the new, modern, scientific Greek New Testaments continue to have thousands of changes but still end up in bed with Westcott and Hort.

* Anyone who has published knows how repeated efforts still yield mistakes, in spite of our computers pointing out the most obvious errors, omissions, and additions.

A Simple Comparison – The First Gospel, Genesis 3:15

KJV Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Roman Catholic Reims-Douai Genesis 3:15 – I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.

We can also find a Roman Catholic version where this obvious error is smoothed over, but that does not mean Rome’s dogma has changed. Nevertheless, the craven heirs of the Reformation are happy to work jointly with Roman Catholic leaders at the highest levels of text criticism, translation, and publishing.

Westcott and Hort Took the Text Frauds to the Next Level

Tischendorf promoted his heroics, which appealed to those who wanted the oldest witnesses to be quite different from the traditional text. Westcott and Hort took over the job of promotion and printed their own Greek New Testament in secret for use in the 19th century revision of the KJV. They pushed it upon the groups of KJV revision scholars but did not openly publish their Greek text until the new Bible came out. Many were horrified by the liberties and unvarnished egos of Westcott and Hort, but their unhinged approach took over by the 1930s and now controls all new Bible translations. Their “modern, scientific, precise” translations are nothing more than cobbled-together, copy and paste jobs edited by the authority of the Bible book sellers.

Figure 16 Barbara and Kurt Aland canonized the Tischendorf-Westcott-Hort efforts and baptized them “The Standard Text.”

Authors and Books – Good and Bad – On the Greek New Testament

This list is very important, necessary for a better grasp of these issues concerning the Bible and its accurate translation. They are in order of importance, so the top ones are best to start. I buy used copies most of the time, from Alibris. Other used sources are Amazon used books, Biblio, and eBay. Watch and wait, because some very expensive books are offered for a fraction of the price later. I got a $300+ book for $25 later.

Greek New Testaments

• Stephanus – Majority – Good, also found on Biblegateway.com
• Westcott and Hort – Horrible, with no explanations at all
• United Bible Societies – Horrible but they include lots of critical apparatus at the bottom of each page, to explain their conclusions.

Bad Text Criticism – Acolytes of Tischendorf, Westcott and Hort

• Bruce Metzger – The Text of the New Testament, Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 1964. Note – “corruption” refers to the Majority Text.
• Metzger, Reminiscences of an Octogenarian, 1997
• J. Harold Greenlee, Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism, 1995. Traditionalists are wrong because they disagree with the bogus and fantastical Westcott-Hort theories! – circular reasoning.
• Kurt and Barbara Aland, The Text of the New Testament, 1981. He continued the Westcott-Hort argumentation, via Nestle, his mentor. The Nestle-Aland United Bible Society edition has become the favorite of liberals, apostates, and Lutherans. The New KJV constantly references NU in footnotes – for this Nestle-Aland-UBS edition – and M for the Majority Text. Is this citing of NU any different from the RSV footnoting Isaiah 7:10 – “or virgin?” RSV Isaiah 7:10 now reads – “a young woman will conceive and bear a son.”

Good Text Criticism

1. Edward Freer Hills – The King James Version Defended, 1988. Hills was a top Latin student at Yale, studied for a doctorate at Chicago and was blocked by Metzger, then finished his doctorate at Harvard. He tutored Theodore Letis, who is best appreciated through his videos.

2. Wilbur N. Pickering, The Identity of the New Testament Text, 2014. A layman pointed out Pickering to me. As one person wrote, Pickering destroyed the entire modern argument against the modernist, eclectic (invented) Greek text.

3. About Tischendorf

4. James Bentley, Secrets of Mt. Sinai. The Story of the World’s Oldest Bible – Codex Sinaiticus, 1986. This is so hilariously worshipful that its thesis self- destructs. “Tischendorf was obsessed…” Yes.

5. J. A. Moorman, Was Codex Sinaiticus Written in 1840? 2018. Moorman is a KJV defender and the author of many comparison books on the KJV.

6. Dr. Constantine Tischendorf, Codex Sinaiticus. 1934.

7. YouTube – History Education for KJB Believers – lecture by Chris Pinto, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4sx2WM-nsM

8. David W. Daniels, Who Faked the “World’s Oldest Bible”? 2021. This book goes over the details of Tischendorf’s life and travels, with an emphasis on explaining how a gift book was turned into the oldest Bible, even though there are no traces of it, no record of Sinaiticus until the mid-19th century.

Apologetic Books – In Defense of the Christian Faith



Figure 17 David Otis Fuller has reliable books answering the modernists.


1. David Otis Fuller – He has at good books that address key issues:

2. Which Bible? – Essays on the KJV translators – learned men; Dean Burdon – by Edward F. Hills, Modern criticism, Codex Vaticanus, the problems of Westcott-Hort theories.

3. True or False? – Various Greek texts explained (Stephens, Tischendorf, etc), Burdon on The Revision Revised. Pickering (above) on the contributions of Dean Burgon.

4. Counterfeit or Genuine? – The Ending of Mark by Dean Burdon, Woman Caught in Adultery – Burdon, Preservation of the Scriptures.

5. Gregory Jackson – Liberalism, Its Cause and Cure. The Poisoning of American Christianity and Its Cure. This is a review of how the 20th century Christian Church became apostate, fallen from faith.

This Is How the Text Fraud Expanded, From Tischendorf to the KJV Revision

Older books, considered classics, are reprinted using the best possible original text of the author. The issue is not whether people can compare and edit the Bible texts, but how they approach their task. In the past, the Biblical text editors were men who considered the Bible the Word of God, the infallible and inerrant revelation of the Holy Trinity. However, the 19th century was greatly influenced by rationalism, so various experts treated the Bible, not as the work of God for man, but another book by man about God. The British-American revision of the King James Version of the Bible was a perfect, but not a unique, example. Given the goal of a modest revision of the KJV language (using the same Traditional Text as before), the team of Westcott and Hort secretly provided their own text of the New Testament. The language of the KJV had been modestly revised before – and we use that revision today – but the new, eclectic or pasted together Greek text emboldened academics to treat the Bible as just another book, no different from Homer’s Odyssey or Marco Polo’s Travels.

Perhaps I was influenced by my father’s name – Homer – and an uncle’s name – Horace – to dabble in classical culture, the so-called dead languages of Latin and Greek, the histories of Greece and Rome. People thought it was odd to waste my college years on Latin and Greek, even more so later. When I told the dean of our tiny seminary that I was also taking Hebrew, he said, “Why, Greg? You will not get academic credit for it.” I wanted to read the original, and I earned the prize at seminary for “best Hebrew scholar” by being the only one. I won a Hebrew Old Testament. I did more language study at Yale, taking Hebrew exegesis of Genesis, Greek exegesis of Thessalonians, and a doctoral seminar that assumed knowledge of the Biblical languages. Besides that, my wife Christina earlier encouraged me to take German 1, 2, and modern German literature – and she took two years of Greek in college. She shocked the Greek exegesis of Thessalonians professor by taking notes for me when I took a course at Yale Medical School.

Although I dreamed of traveling the world on someone else’s budget, the study of languages more than satisfied that longing – by including ancient histories, pivotal battles on land and at sea, against great armies and against Herman the German. I am only listing these language adventures to point out the obvious – the typical pastor no longer knows Greek or Hebrew, because the courses have been dropped or watered down to a summer session. The language of the Old Testament is considered too difficult for the snowflakes of today. Language requirements for future ELCA ministers have slipped down to a summer term in Greek, $3,000 cash payment in advance, to fulfill the requirement. If Biblical languages are almost lost among the clergy, how much discernment can they have with the new Bibles? They are going to aim at the popular preferences, just as they decide on popcorn or peanuts, Coke or Pepsi, for their Sunday Seeker Services.

What will the pastor or lay leader say when the experts declare, “The woman caught in adultery passage does not fit in the Gospel of John and is obviously a late addition to the Gospel of John”? How will they respond to their own New Testament teachers dropping Mark 16:9-20? There must be a connection between selling Here I Stand socks for the Reformation’s 500th Anniversary and promoting a butchered Gospel of Mark at an inflated price, as Concordia Publishing House has done. That commentary is based on the fraudulent Codex Vaticanus! (James Voelz, Mark, Concordia Publishing House, LCMS, 2013.)

This book is aimed at laity and clergy who want to know the issues and how to have reason for the hope within them.



II. Christian Faith and the Greek Text Problem

The sole purpose of the Bible is to teach faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Word Incarnate. Long ago, Yale University taught the Scriptural revelation Creation, Adam and Eve, the Virgin Birth of Christ and His Resurrection. However, rationalism grew in Europe in the 19th century, and American academics trained in Germany brought back these ideas as the new intellectual leaders of their denominations. A good example is Walter Rauschenbusch, whose 1917 Social Gospel lectures at Yale re-interpreted the ministry and message of Jesus. The lectures changed the eternal Gospel into political and social activism. Every miracle had a rationalistic explanation, and Jesus was divine only in the way people could see God through Him.

Two Biblical Views

There are only two basic views of the Bible. One holds that the Spirit reveals God’s will, from the Creation to the end of time. The Scriptures are infallible and inerrant, the inerrancy term used recently because infallible was re-interpreted to mean “fallible in Biblical history and geography,” thanks to the influence of rationalism. This divide became more apparent as people were promoted or shunned for their views on the Bible. R. C. H. Lenski was silenced, shunned, and replaced as the New Testament Professor at Capital University Seminary, for teaching inerrancy and insisting on it before the 1930 merger. Although Lenski remains one of the most respected New Testament scholars in print, he was followed by a professor who taught the opposite to the seminarians. Thus, inerrancy was retired with Professor Lenski although the ALC/TALC retained an illusion of conservatism until it merged with the AELC and LCA in 1987 to form ELCA nicknamed “Every Left-wing Cause in America.”

As the Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry has shown, the Lutheran authors of the 19th century were believers who taught faith in Christ and maintained an unequivocal trust in the truth of the Scriptures. That is what makes the books of Krauth, Jacobs, Schmauk, and many others so valuable today.* They explain the Scriptures rather than substituting their ideas for the truths revealed.

* The classic Lutheran works of the General Council are available and free at the Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry – lutheranlibrary.org. Many are also inexpensively published in print through Amazon.com.

This change in Biblical views, so easily seen in all denominations today, is directly involved in replacing the faithful Greek text – the Majority Text or Traditional Text of the KJV– for a constantly changing version of the Westcott-Hort version. Westcott-Hort, under the management of Nestle-Aland, is now accepted as universal for almost all denominations. The United Bible Society text was marshaled by appealing to cooperation among Protestants and Roman Catholics and creatively paraphrased by the Eugene Nida translation theories. Now they present many versions of the Bible God Would Have Revealed If He Were As Clever as Westcott-Hort, Aland, and Nida.

We are living in the Age of the Great Apostasy. The visible Church is ruled by officials who once believed the basics of the Christian Faith but their replacements now resent the blockheads who insist on the King James Version, the classic hymns, the historic liturgy. Apostasy is far more dangerous than atheism, because the liberated minds and consciences of apostasy bitterly resent the old ways and those who represent them. Guided by their Father Below, they have systematically destroyed church music, the sermon, the liturgy, the Creeds, and the gracious message of forgiveness and salvation through faith in Christ the Savior.

This fact should alarm all the faithful laity – those who attend seminary and college in their denomination are quietly guided to use every translation except one with King James in the title. Divinity schools offering genuine PhDs are just as exacting. The publication houses, hymnals, and educational materials are established in the same Westcott-Hort world view, with monetary rewards and perks enjoyed by constantly replacing hymnals and other materials. The earlier NIV was replaced completely by the new version in 2011. No denomination was allowed to continue publishing their material with the “classic” NIV. The Biblegateway.com website – which they own – also dropped the “classic” NIV in favor of the new one, which was demonstrably worse.

Why do the denomination leaders go radical against those books that advocate for the King James Version? If they want to use guilt by association, a logical fallacy treasured by many today, do they dare look closely at their heroes of text and Biblical scholarship?



Figure 18 Yale’s Nils Dahl asked his doctoral seminar what they knew for certain about the New Testament. We were all stymied. He said, “The text! The text! We have the text!” That is how he moved away from 19th century apostate theories.

III. Books and Authors for Text and Translation Research, Laity and Pastors Alike



Edward Freer Hills (1912-1981) graduated in Latin from Yale University, Phi Beta Kappa.

He earned several seminary degrees, did graduate work at the University of Chicago, and completed a PhD in text criticism at Harvard University. His King James Version Defended is one of the best and most readable books on the topic. His style is plain, so his discussions of the following issues are easily comprehended by ministers and laity alike:

• The Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7-8
• The ending of Mark, Mark 16:9-20
• The woman caught in Adultery, John 7:53-8:11
• The doxology of the Lord’s Prayer.

His King James Version Defended contains a wealth of information about all the issues, including background about the individuals, though Tyndale has been overlooked. The book can be obtained on Amazon and also found as a $5 Kindle in the original title Text and Time.



Wilbur N. Pickering’s The Identity of the New Testament Text is ideal for reading after being daunted and confused by the goofy, unwarranted theories of Westcott-Hort and their acolytes. As someone wrote, Pickering simply destroys their arguments with a careful analysis of the facts. Some basics for the Pickering approach are:

There are no “text-types” among the manuscripts.

1. Contrary to Hort, early manuscripts were changed by heretics for dogmatic reasons. Early church fathers complained about this.
2. No manuscript is dated, and it is clear that most of them could not have survived outside the dry, Egyptian climate, so the late dates of the Majority (Byzantine) text come from the earlier copies being used up by reading and copying.
3. The history of text criticism shows that Westcott- Hort used their prestige to promote an alternative to the Majority Text that was – and remains – an invention based on unhinged speculation.


Figure 19 Dean Burgon was a scholar who attacked the obvious failings of Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, but the buzz favored the Tischendorf frauds and the jigsaw puzzle texts of Wescott-Hort.

Dean John William Burgon (1813-1888)

Burgon has a pugnacious society named after him, the Dean Burgon Society, which helps keep the flame alive for the King James Version. First of all, Burgon was a sworn and published enemy of German rationalism, which was promoted by the Essays and Reviews edited by John William Parker. Burgon was appreciated for his sermons against the book. His writing is heavy duty, not light work to read, but much clearer after reading Hill and Pickering. A good explanation of how Bibles became corrupted is detailed in his The Revision Revised: A Refutation of Westcott and Hort’s False Greek Text and Theory. The basic argument is clear and very much like Hill’s and Pickering’s – the Bible is established for believers and must be studied and explained by believers. There is no middle ground or compromise, even though the denominations are feathering their nests with the constant flow of new, improved, but clearly dishonest translations.

Burgon thought Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were both forgeries, because any codex that old would have been read or copied to extinction. Neither one had an origin or history, with most likely births in the 1840s (Sinaiticus) and the 1500s (Vaticanus). Trusting these two mystery books goes against the basic rules of evidence. The forgeries are a tiny minority of favored examples against 5,000 or more Majority Text witnesses.



Figure 20 Jack Moorman made important contributions to the Sinaiticus fraud and other issues.

Jack Moorman is a member of the Dean Burgon Society, and he has written several books on the topic of manuscripts, including a good summary in

Was Codex Sinaiticus Written in 1840?
• Early Manuscripts, Church Fathers, and the Authorised Version.
• Forever Settled: A Survey of the Documents and History of the Bible.

Early Manuscripts have extensive charts of the Majority Text compared to sources favored by the modern text critics. For those who like to view the words missing from the NIV, ESV, RSV, this volume is handy and mostly visual.

Forever Settled is a thorough history of versions, translators, and text criticism. The book is quite valuable for amount of time and material covered.


Kurt Aland and Barbara Aland, The Text of the New Testament

This is essential reading for understanding the perspective of modern text criticism, which has united previous text and translations efforts. The best way to find the weakness of an argument is to start with those who advocate it. More needs to be said about Eugene Nida, who accomplished as much against precise translation as Westcott-Hort, and Aland did against faithful manuscripts. Kurt Aland denied the apostolic origin of the Four Gospels early in his career, not to mention many other denials. He is no less bigoted against the New Testament as Rev. Hort, who preferred a “Mary religion” to a “Jesus religion.” Hort, as many people recall, “loathed the Textus Receptus” (Majority Text).





Maurice A. Robinson and William G. Pierpont came together to show the statistical value of examining the Greek text and found the Byzantine Text the original going back to the apostolic authors, the eclectic (pasted together) text of Westcott-Hort and their followers to be in the wrong.

Imagine the entire radical Westcott-Hort-Nestle-Aland- Nida coming undone as people realize they built their new “scientific” dynamic equivalence Bibles on union with Rome and two fraudulent sources – Vaticanus and Sinaiticus.

See and hear the Byzantine Text here – https://byzantinetext.com/

All sections of The King James Version: Precise Translation versus Fraudulent Texts and Heretical Translations

• Section I. Introduction
• Section II. The Efficacy of the Word
• Section III. The Forerunner and the Biblical Shepherd Theme
• Section IV. The History of the Bible
• Section V. One Reformation
• Section VI.Tyndale Perfected in English What Luther Created in German
• Section VII. The Greek New Testament Fraud

Continued from Part V. One Reformation, One Evangelical and Protestant Church

The Wycliffe Bible was an early translation of the Bible from a group of Oxford scholars connected with John Wycliffe. He translated part of the Bible from the Latin Vulgate to English, and his associates translated the Old Testament – it is thought. This began the early stages of English reform, which often teetered back and forth between Protestantism and Romanism, depending on the actual faith of the monarch. The criticized and glamorized Ann Boleyn moved Henry VIII toward Protestantism. Edward VI followed his father Henry VIII but only reigned as a Protestant for six years. Queen Mary, following her mother’s Catholic convictions, reversed King Edward’s gains and prosecuted Protestants. Queen Elizabeth I favored the Protestants but always kept everyone off-balance. A pope said, “She only controls part of an island, and yet all of Europe is afraid of her.” England supposedly chose a Protestant in King James I, but that began an era where the Stuart kings left an indelible bad impression on England.*

* The monarchs between Henry VIII and James I provide a fascinating look at the time when the Bible was becoming the Book of the people, which really started with Wycliffe. The rumors and facts are abundant about the rulers involved, narratives mixed together in Biblical dramas and romances.

William Tyndale is the pivotal figure in the history of the English Bible, because he translated from Greek and Hebrew – and Henry VIII had him killed and then burned at the stake. Tyndale was born in 1494, between the births of Luther (1486) and Melanchthon (1497). He shared the excitement of the Bible being available in Hebrew (with help from Reuchlin, Melanchthon’s uncle) and Greek (thanks to Erasmus). Tyndale was an exceptional scholar in many languages. He earned his first degree from Oxford in 1512 and his master’s degree in 1515. He was fluent in Hebrew, Greek, German, Latin, and more – beyond the requirements of a PhD in theology today. But he found the same ossified principles that plagued Luther and caused the Reformer to learn directly from the Scriptures. Tyndale wrote:

They have ordained that no man shall look on the Scripture, until he be noselled (nursed, nuzzled) in heathen learning eight or nine years and armed with false principles, with which he is clean shut out of the understanding of the Scripture.

Tyndale also studied at Cambridge, where Erasmus had previously taught, another step in giving the linguist the best of language training. This is another telling anecdote about Tyndale:

It was not long after this, that in disputing with a divine reputed to be quite learned, Tyndale utterly confounded him with certain texts of Scripture; upon which the irritated papist exclaimed, — “It were better for us to be without God’s laws, than without the Pope’s!” This was a little too much for Tyndale, who boldly replied, “I defy the Pope, and all his laws; and if God spare my life, ere many years, I will cause a boy that driveth the plow to know more of the Scripture than you do!” A noble boast; and nobly redeemed at the cost of his life! (Alexander McClure, The Translators Revived, p. 14. )

Tyndale could get no support for translating the Bible in England, so he traveled to Germany and enrolled at Wittenberg University. He translated the New Testament into English by 1525. He also stayed at Worms for a year, according to Spalatin. Since Tyndale was fluent in German, Luther’s Bible was a great help, but as every language student knows, having another translation in a different language is an aid in many ways, but the path to clarity in another language is still laborious. However, this safe haven in Germany brought together Tyndale and the Luther circle; their concentration of genius and faithfulness to the Word of God channeled the Reformation into Tyndale, and through Tyndale, the King James Version, and the British Empire.

The way of the cross means persecution. England resisted freelance publishing of the Bible, which was illegal. Moreover, the English bishops were prone to strike out against Tyndale because he openly despised their lordly power, perks, and use of force. Lazy and overpaid ecclesiastics do not tolerate disruption of their realm. Cardinal Woolsey and Thomas Moore opposed Tyndale, so he stayed in Europe.

In 1535, Tyndale was betrayed by a friend, seized in Antwerp, strangled, and then burned at the stake. His dying words were, “Lord, open the king’s eyes,” but it was another king – James – who had the Tyndale fashioned as the official, royal, and only Bible for English-speaking people. The English Bible translations were all derived from Tyndale’s, some of them being –

1. The Coverdale Bible, 1535, Antwerp, used Tyndale and other sources.
2. Coverdale revised this as the Great Bible in 1539.
3. The Bishop’s Bible
4. The King James or Authorised Version, 1611

Tyndale in Print

The first decided steps, however, toward giving to the English nation a Bible printed in their own tongue, were the translations of the Gospels of Matthew and Mark, made by William Tyndale, and by him printed at Hamburg, in the year 1524; — and a translation of the whole of the New Testament, printed by him partly at Cologne, and partly at Worms, in 1525. After six editions of the Testament had been issued, he published Genesis and Deuteronomy, in 1530; and next year the Pentateuch. In the year 1535 was printed the entire Bible, under the auspices of Miles Coverdale, who mostly followed Tyndale as far as he had gone; but without any other connection with him. Of Coverdale, further mention will be made. But in the year 1537 appeared a folio Bible, printed in some city of Germany, with the following title, — “The Byble, which is the Holy Scripture; in which are contayned the Olde and Newe Testament, truely and purely translated into Englysh —by Thomas Matthew.— MDXXXVII.” This is substantially the basis of all the other versions of the Bible into English, including that which is now in such extensive use. It contains Tyndale’s labors as far as he had gone previous to his martyrdom by fire about a year before its publication. That is to say, the whole of the New Testament, and of the Old, as far as the end of the Second Book of Chronicles, or exactly two-thirds of the entire Scriptures, were Tyndale’s work. The other third, comprising the remainder of the Old Testament, was made by his friend and co-la borer, Thomas Matthew, who was no other than John Rogers, the famous martyr, after wards burnt in the days of “bloody Mary;” and who, at the time of his immortal publication, went by the name of Matthew.(The Translators Revived, p. 16.)

Those who criticize the KJV for its Shakespearean eloquence only pave the way for more Surfer Dude Bibles, where the English language is so debased that only a resemblance to the original text remains. There are amplified and living Bibles, which add many more words to the concise text. But we have to concede – based on actual history and experience – that Eugene Nida has produced the era of where all the translations are really paraphrases based on the corrupted and imaginary New Testament text they now call Standard.

Whether people believe it or not, the King James and Shakespeare are the foundation of our English language. Both have remained foundational, even if modern education condemns what is good and elevates what is infantile and evil.

The King James Version was ordered by the monarch because all previous English Bibles were either inadequate or Tyndale’s. Each previous English translation certainly had its influence on the final version, but Tyndale had greatest influence of all. That should make all modern Lutheran leaders consider that the Bible they despise and avoid the most is also the one most directly linked to Luther’s method and language. Tyndale saw his brave efforts burned by savage prelates and commented, “They may burn me one day.” They did.

How ironic that the modern scholars have tried to replace the reliable Majority New Testament text with a bad one they conjured from Vaticanus – a dubious source unimproved by the accolades of Romanizing Protestants and rationalists. The modern scholars, publishing companies, and denominations have filled their pockets by corrupting the Gospel and telling the people – “You are not smart enough or educated enough to understand our great work of emancipation.” As the text scholar – Kurt Aland – said, “The Majority Text is dead.” But Tyndale had the exact opposite attitude toward the Bible –

“Which thing only” he says, “moved me to trans late the New Testament. Because I had perceived by experience, how that it was impossible to establish the lay people in any truth, except the Scripture were plainly laid before their eyes in the mother tongue.” (The Translators Revived, p. 16. )

The KJV Editors and Translators – Seven Year Miracle

If the Bible is just another book written by man, the faith of the translators and editors does not matter. But if the Bible is the one and only revelation of God, unique and inerrant, the Book that judges all books, as Luther said, then the editors and translators should be devout, faithful Christians, devoid of papal inclinations. Tragically, the norms of the King James Version were reversed by the Revision of 1880. Westcott and Hort – who hated the Majority Text and favored “Mary religion” over Jesus religion – were allowed to create their own Greek New Testament, using no explanatory notes, secretly handing them to the committees as they produced the epic flop – The Revision. The public in Britain and America repudiated this imaginary Greek New Testament, which I own, and disliked the so-called Revision of the KJV. However, German rationalism and other factors led to the adoption of Westcott-Hort, Protestant views of the Antichrist in Rome softened over the years through Catholic participation in the Bible societies. From 1930 on, Bible editing and translating became the equivalent of Archer-Daniel- Mitchell taking over Organic Gardening because “we know so much more about chemical farming now.”* Ecumenical efforts camouflaged doctrinal issues and second-rate professors were flattered as advisors for each new Bible.

* The irony of modern agriculture is that man-made chemicals can be enormously damaging and expensive, while using and appreciating the engineering of Creation can work miracles for almost no cost. Cardboard and newsprint handle weed control, rain and snow fertilize with usable nitrogen. Beneficial insects grow in numbers by letting their newborns digest damaging pests. O tempora, O mores. (Shame on our era! shame on our principles!)

The creation of the King James Version was quite different from the shameful Revision. There was no effort to jettison the Majority Text, which Westcott and Hort did dishonestly and secretly over a period of 10 years. Bumptious Westcott and Hort, longtime friends and colleagues, created their own Greek New Testament over that decade of revision, then published their Greek volume immediately when the Revision came out in English, one boondoggle supporting the other. Nothing really compares to the audacity of two men engaging in a hostile takeover of the New Testament and the translators tolerating the shell game. But now, there is no international opposition, so error moves forward in peace and harmony with Rome.

The KJV Teams

Queen Elizabeth was a genius at keeping people guessing, stymied by imagining her next move. Her very threatening half-sister Queen Mary (Bloody Mary) wanted her at the Mass, and Elizabeth attended – but slipped out during service. When King James I ascended to the throne, he was met with a petition to sort out the many contradictions in English Christianity. He called for a conference at Hampton Court in 1603, where his dislike of Puritans was expressed in various forms. However, a Puritan, Dr. Reynolds, suggested a unifying Bible:

“That a translation be made of the whole Bible, as consonant as can be to the original Hebrew and, Greek; and this to be set out and printed, without any marginal notes, and only to be used in all churches of England, in time of divine service.”*

* The Translators Revived, p. 35. Dr. Reynolds is a good example for those who think standing up to the monarch (district or synod president) is a mistake, bound to accomplish nothing. We need many more Reynolds and far fewer Wormtongues.

The work began in 1604 and finished in seven years, a remarkable accomplishment which built upon the various editions of Tyndale (all the English Bibles after him) -combining the eloquence of editing with their scholarship of ancient languages.

Skeptics, grasping for excuses, claim that many people continue to use the King James because of tradition, nostalgia, superstition, and obstinance. The strength of this Bible comes from its excellence, which is so apparent that current revisions begin with the original rather than trying to invent their own.

Thus, it came to pass that the English Bible received its present form, after a fivefold revision of the translation as it was left in 1537 by Tyndale and Rogers. During this interval of seventy-four years, it had been slowly ripening, till this last, most elaborate, and thorough revision under King James matured the work for coming centuries. It is a very great advantage, that the work, which was well done at first, had the benefit of this accumulated labor and pious care bestowed upon it by so many zealous and erudite scholars in long succession. To this is to be ascribed much of its intrinsic excellence and lasting popularity. Its origin and history so strongly commended it, that it speedily came into general use as the standard version, by the common consent of the English people; and required no act of parliament nor royal proclamation to establish its authority. Some of the older versions continued to be reprinted for forty years; but no long time elapsed ere the common version quietly and exclusively occupied the field. (Reviving the Translators, p. 35.)

From Luther to Tyndale to the King James Version

Anyone who learns German or another language realizes that Tyndale did far more than use Luther’s style and expression. Tyndale adopted the true translator’s style of precision. Below are comparisons with Luther and the Tyndale KJV, compared to the new approach from Nida – dynamic corruption based on a personal agenda.

Teach All Nations, Matthew 28:19-20
Stephanus, Majority Text.

19 πορευθεντες [Go} ουν μαθητευσατε [teach all nations] παντα τα εθνη βαπτιζοντες [baptizing] αυτους εις το ονομα του πατρος και του υιου και του αγιου πνευματος

20 διδασκοντες [teaching] αυτους τηρειν παντα οσα ενετειλαμην υμιν και ιδου εγω μεθ υμων ειμι πασας τας ημερας εως της συντελειας του αιωνος αμην – Stephanus, Majority Text.

Luther, 1545 Bible

19 Darum gehet hin [Go] und lehret alle Völker [teach all nations] und taufet sie [baptizing] im Namen des Vaters und des Sohnes und des heiligen Geistes,

20 und lehret [teach] sie halten alles, was ich euch befohlen habe. Und siehe, ich bin bei euch alle Tage bis an der Welt Ende. – Luther, 1545 Bible

KJV, 1611

Matthew 28: 19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

NIV 2011

19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

“Make disciples” is also in the modern German paraphrase. The common cause for this is the Church Growth agenda for “making disciples” through Pietistic cell groups. Nida should receive condemnation for distorting the text to make it man-centered, man’s work for God. The New KJV agrees with the NIV on this passage.

1 Corinthians 10:16
Stephanus Majority Text

16 το ποτηριον της ευλογιας ο ευλογουμεν ουχι κοινωνια του αιματος του χριστου εστιν τον αρτον ον κλωμεν ουχι κοινωνια του σωματος του χριστου εστιν

Luther Bible 1545

16 Der gesegnete Kelch, welchen wir segnen, ist der nicht die Gemeinschaft [communion with the blood of Christ] des Blutes Christi? Das Brot, das wir brechen, ist das nicht die Gemeinschaft [communion of the body of Christ] des Leibes Christi?

KJV, 1611

16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?

NIV 2011

Is not the cup of thanksgiving for which we give thanks a participation in the blood of Christ? And is not the bread that we break a participation in the body of Christ? [Participation is a vague word used for denying the Real Presence, the validity of the Visible Word. The New KJV agrees with the Greek, Luther, and KJV.]

Romans 3: 22-23
Stephanus Majority Text

22 δικαιοσυνη δε θεου δια πιστεως ιησου χριστου εις παντας και επι παντας τους πιστευοντας ου γαρ εστιν διαστολη

23 παντες γαρ ημαρτον και υστερουνται της δοξης του θεου

One “all.”

King James, 1611

KJV Romans 3:22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: 23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

One “all.”

The Old NIV, 1984

1984 NIV (and earlier) Romans 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God…and are justified freely by his grace…

One “all”

NIV 2011-The Extra Word Inserted – All

2011 NIV Romans 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.

This new paraphrase teaches that every single person is justified, forgiven, saved, without faith. That dogma is also called Objective Justification, General Justification, Universal Objective Justification, and Universalism.

Continued in Section VII. The Greek New Testament Fraud

All sections of The King James Version: Precise Translation versus Fraudulent Texts and Heretical Translations

I get confused sometimes about who translated the first English Bible, and then who came after him, etc. I therefore researched it from several web sites to write this article. Most of the information I got came from English Bible History

John Wycliffe

The first hand-written English language Bible manuscripts were produced in the 1380’s AD by John Wycliffe, an Oxford professor, scholar, and theologian. Wycliffe, (also spelled “Wycliff” & “Wyclif”), was well-known throughout Europe for his opposition to the teaching of the organized Church, which he believed to be contrary to the Bible. With the help of his followers, called the Lollards, and his assistant Purvey, and many other faithful scribes, Wycliffe produced dozens of English language manuscript copies of the scriptures. They were translated out of the Latin Vulgate, which was the only source text available to Wycliffe. The Pope was so infuriated by his teachings and his translation of the Bible into English, that 44 years after Wycliffe had died, he ordered the bones to be dug-up, crushed, and scattered in the river!

John Colet

In 1496, John Colet, another Oxford professor and the son of the Mayor of London, started reading the New Testament in Greek and translating it into English for his students at Oxford, and later for the public at Saint Paul’s Cathedral in London. The people were so hungry to hear the Word of God in a language they could understand, that within six months there were 20,000 people packed in the church and at least that many outside trying to get in! (Sadly, while the enormous and beautiful Saint Paul’s Cathedral remains the main church in London today, as of 2003, typical Sunday morning worship attendance is only around 200 people… and most of them are tourists). Fortunately for Colet, he was a powerful man with friends in high places, so he amazingly managed to avoid execution.

William Tyndale

William Tyndale was the Captain of the Army of Reformers, and was their spiritual leader. Tyndale holds the distinction of being the first man to ever print the New Testament in the English language. Tyndale was a true scholar and a genius, so fluent in eight languages that it was said one would think any one of them to be his native tongue. He is frequently referred to as the “Architect of the English Language”, (even more so than William Shakespeare) as so many of the phrases Tyndale coined are still in our language today. According to https://www.tbsbibles.org/page/William_Tyndale, Tyndale was influenced by John Colet. William Tyndale died for translating the Bible into English, creating the forerunner of the KJV.

William Tyndale wanted to use the same 1516 Erasmus text as a source to translate and print the New Testament in English for the first time in history. Tyndale showed up on Luther’s doorstep in Germany in 1525, and by year’s end had translated the New Testament into English. Tyndale had been forced to flee England, because of the wide-spread rumor that his English New Testament project was underway, causing inquisitors and bounty hunters to be constantly on Tyndale’s trail to arrest him and prevent his project. God foiled their plans, and in 1525-1526 the Tyndale New Testament became the first printed edition of the scripture in the English language. Subsequent printings of the Tyndale New Testament in the 1530’s were often elaborately illustrated.

They were burned as soon as the Bishop could confiscate them, but copies trickled through and actually ended up in the bedroom of King Henry VIII. The more the King and Bishop resisted its distribution, the more fascinated the public at large became. The church declared it contained thousands of errors as they torched hundreds of New Testaments confiscated by the clergy, while in fact, they burned them because they could find no errors at all. One risked death by burning if caught in mere possession of Tyndale’s forbidden books.

Tyndale was incarcerated for 500 days before he was strangled and burned at the stake in 1536. Tyndale’s last words were, “Oh Lord, open the King of England’s eyes”. This prayer would be answered just three years later in 1539, when King Henry VIII finally allowed, and even funded, the printing of an English Bible known as the “Great Bible”. But before that could happen…

Myles Coverdale

Myles Coverdale and John “Thomas Matthew” Rogers had remained loyal disciples the last six years of Tyndale’s life, and they carried the English Bible project forward and even accelerated it. Coverdale finished translating the Old Testament, and in 1535 he printed the first complete Bible in the English language, making use of Luther’s German text and the Latin as sources. Thus, the first complete English Bible was printed on October 4, 1535, and is known as the Coverdale Bible.

John Rogers

John Rogers went on to print the second complete English Bible in 1537. It was, however, the first English Bible translated from the original Biblical languages of Hebrew & Greek. He printed it under the pseudonym “Thomas Matthew”, (an assumed name that had actually been used by Tyndale at one time) as a considerable part of this Bible was the translation of Tyndale, whose writings had been condemned by the English authorities. It is a composite made up of Tyndale’s Pentateuch and New Testament (1534-1535 edition) and Coverdale’s Bible and some of Roger’s own translation of the text. It remains known most commonly as the Matthew-Tyndale Bible. It went through a nearly identical second-edition printing in 1549.

Thomas Cranmer

In 1539, Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Canterbury, hired Myles Coverdale at the bequest of King Henry VIII to publish the “Great Bible”. It became the first English Bible authorized for public use, as it was distributed to every church, chained to the pulpit, and a reader was even provided so that the illiterate could hear the Word of God in plain English. It would seem that William Tyndale’s last wish had been granted…just three years after his martyrdom. Cranmer’s Bible, published by Coverdale, was known as the Great Bible due to its great size: a large pulpit folio measuring over 14 inches tall. Seven editions of this version were printed between April of 1539 and December of 1541.

John Knox

In the 1550’s, the Church at Geneva, Switzerland, was very sympathetic to the reformer refugees and was one of only a few safe havens for a desperate people. Many of them met in Geneva, led by Myles Coverdale and John Foxe (publisher of the famous Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, which is to this day the only exhaustive reference work on the persecution and martyrdom of Early Christians and Protestants from the first century up to the mid-16th century), as well as Thomas Sampson and William Whittingham. There, with the protection of the great theologian John Calvin (author of the most famous theological book ever published, Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion) and John Knox, the great Reformer of the Scottish Church, the Church of Geneva determined to produce a Bible that would educate their families while they continued in exile. The Bible they produced was therefore called the Geneva Bible.

The New Testament in 1557 and the Old Testament in 1560 was translated into English in Geneva by a colony of Protestant scholars in exile from England who worked under the general direction of Miles Coverdale and John Knox and under the influence of John Calvin. The English churchmen had fled London during the repressive reign of the Roman Catholic Mary I, which had halted the publication of Bibles there.

The Geneva Bible was the first Bible to add numbered verses to the chapters, so that referencing specific passages would be easier. Every chapter was also accompanied by extensive marginal notes and references so thorough and complete that the Geneva Bible is also considered the first English “Study Bible”. William Shakespeare quotes hundreds of times in his plays from the Geneva translation of the Bible.

The Geneva Bible became the Bible of choice for over 100 years of English speaking Christians. Between 1560 and 1644 at least 144 editions of this Bible were published. Examination of the 1611 King James Bible shows clearly that its translators were influenced much more by the Geneva Bible, than by any other source. The Geneva Bible itself retains over 90% of William Tyndale’s original English translation. The Geneva in fact, remained more popular than the King James Version until decades after its original release in 1611! The Geneva holds the honor of being the first Bible taken to America, and the Bible of the Puritans and Pilgrims. It is truly the “Bible of the Protestant Reformation.”

King James I

With the death of Queen Elizabeth I, Prince James VI of Scotland became King James I of England. The Protestant clergy approached the new King in 1604 and announced their desire for a new translation to replace the Bishop’s Bible first printed in 1568. They knew that the Geneva Version had won the hearts of the people because of its excellent scholarship, accuracy, and exhaustive commentary. However, they did not want the controversial marginal notes (proclaiming the Pope an Anti-Christ, etc.) Essentially, the leaders of the church desired a Bible for the people, with scriptural references only for word clarification or cross-references. This “translation to end all translations” was the result of the combined effort of about fifty scholars. They took into consideration: The Tyndale New Testament, The Coverdale Bible, The Matthews Bible, The Great Bible, The Geneva Bible, and even the Rheims New Testament. The great revision of the Bishop’s Bible had begun. From 1605 to 1606 the scholars engaged in private research. From 1607 to 1609 the work was assembled. In 1610 the work went to press, and in 1611 the first of the huge (16 inch tall) pulpit folios known today as “The 1611 King James Bible” came off the printing press.

A typographical discrepancy in Ruth 3:15 rendered a pronoun “He” instead of “She” in that verse in some printings. This caused some of the 1611 First Editions to be known by collectors as “He” Bibles, and others as “She” Bibles. Starting just one year after the huge 1611 pulpit-size King James Bibles were printed and chained to every church pulpit in England; printing then began on the earliest normal-size printings of the King James Bible. These were produced so individuals could have their own personal copy of the Bible.

So that’s the history of English Bibles up to the KJV. As frequent visitors of this website know, I use only the KJV to teach God’s Word. But I also like the Geneva Bible and sometimes compare translations with it and the KJV. Some verses I think are clearer in the Geneva Bible such as Romans 1:27 which says:

But I also think the KJV is more polished overall.

Sometimes I wonder if Darby’s dispensationalism would have become popular if the English-speaking world had stuck with the Geneva Bible. The Geneva Bible commentary of Daniel 9:27 correctly calls it a Messianic prophecy fulfilled by Jesus Christ. Dispensationalism and all the false doctrines that arose from it such as “the two peoples of God, the Church and Israel,” the secret pre-tribulation rapture, Christian Zionism, and the Futurist interpretations of the Books of Daniel, Revelation, Matthew 24 and II Thessalonians 2:3-4 would not be so widespread and popular today had evangelical Christians stuck with the Geneva Bible notes! But on the other hand, because of the influence of John Calvin and his doctrines, I can’t agree with all the notes in the Geneva Bible. Moreover, I think because of the popularity of modern English Bibles which are based on bad manuscripts and influenced by Jesuit false doctrines, I think if not John Nelson Darby somebody else sooner or later would have begun the spread of Jesuit dispensational Futurism.

Right or wrong, those are my thoughts on the matter.

Continued from The King James Version: Part IV. The History of the Bible

The historians are fond of speaking about many reformations – Swiss, English, Scottish, Radical, Dutch, Romani. In truth, one Reformation changed the course of Christianity, when Martin Luther and his associates referred to themselves as the Evangelicals within the Church. Later, the term Protestant was associated with their positive witness to the truth (the meaning of Pro and Test) at the Second Speier Conference. Subsequent movements were not part of, but breaks from the Reformation, chiefly from Zwingli and Calvin – and from the Swiss radicals – called Anabaptists, Mennonites, Hutterites. Zwingli and Calvin sought to be associated with Luther but furtively broke from his leadership and established the sect (eventually called Calvinist or Reformed) from which the radicals rebelled.

The Reformation revived the Apostolic Church because of one man – Luther – and one invention, the printing press, proclaiming the Gospel Word in the midst of darkness, superstition, corruption, and slavery. The Word of God had more power than the armies of the Pope and his allies.

Luther was the son of a man who owned and managed mines, with training that promised an honorable and prosperous future. When a violent storm threatened his life, he prayed to the saint of miners that he would become a priest and a monk. Once inside the Augustinian order, he was trained in the Latin philosophies of the Middle Ages – Augustine, Aquinas, and many more. Like many denominations today, which honor the Scriptures with their lips, the Medieval theologians honored their own traditions and fortified them with centuries of tradition and Vatican support.

Luther determined to make himself into the best possible monk and priest, but circumstances molded him into a Doctor of the Bible. His supervisors saw in him the ability to become a professor in the Scriptures, and that meant extra study of the Bible, where his exceptional mind found endless contradictions. If the Bible was indeed the Word of God, then it was at war with the visible Church. If Holy Mother Church in Rome was the ultimate authority, then the Scriptures had to be ignored when enforcing edicts against the Gospel. He was as perfect a monk as any man could be, obsessively so, but that did not change the anguish he felt for his sins. Pleasing God with works only increased the pain. Looking for a way to perfect himself by works, he found forgiveness through faith in Jesus Christ alone.

Most authorities fill many pages about Luther’s conversion to Justification by Faith, but they give little attention to his Biblical approach to the Scriptures. The reason for this lack of foundational work is the weak doctrinal backgrounds of the Pietists, Rationalists, and Calvinists. Given this weak foundation, their conclusions often skirt the boundaries of mockery, caricature, and unbelief. One can argue, with plenty of support, that Luther’s view of the Bible was expressed in the Luther Bible, the Tyndale Bible, and the King James Version. The absence of this perspective has led the greedy printing establishments, denominations, and Bible societies into a nightmare of bad compromised translations based on a corrupt New Testament Greek text.*

* The Old Testament has suffered from similar translating abuse, but the original text is protected by the Masoretic tradition instead of the established monopolies of Hort, Westcost, Nestle, and Aland.

The Gutenberg Press dropped the price of Bibles and Christian literature, so no army could stop the Gospel, because everyone had enough money to learn from the
Good News.

Luther: The Holy Spirit and the Word

Luther had the ability to see the content of the entire Bible as a whole, which is the only proper way to read God’s Word. That perspective is in harmony with traditional Judaism, which is inherently Christian. This view can be discerned in two ways:

1. The Word is never without the Spirit.
2. The Spirit is never without the Word.*

* Adolph Hoenecke expressed this in his Dogmatics, largely ignored by WELS. He included, after those two statements a third – “That is sound doctrine.”

The denominations have fallen far away from #1. Nothing proves that more than the multiplication of programs, gimmicks, and sociological analysis employed by the blind, faithless, and confused leaders, whatever their label might be. The proof is easy to find, in the most powerful and Gospel-centered book of the Old Testament – Isaiah.

Verse 8 defeats the sociological statements of leaders, such as “All organizations are aging, changing, and losing members.” Verse 9 confirms that this passage is beyond our comprehension and only understood by the faith created in us by God. This introduces the Spirit/Word connection found throughout the Scriptures.

No one can dispute that the rain and snow come down and invariably change the soil on which they land. The effects are undebatable – rain and snow melt make the earth come alive, everything budding and growing. The inevitable results of rain and snow are seed for the sower and food for those who hunger.

This parable from God Himself, as Creator and Teacher, cannot be refuted. His Word goes forth from Him, not something to play with, a pointed phrase lifted simply as a secular lesson from an unbelieving speaker. This divine Word has three effects or Promises:

A. The Word will always have a divine effect.
B. The Word will never return to God without a divine effect.
C. The Word will prosper everything God intended.

Thus, the Holy Spirit always works with the Word, since the Word always has an effect, and that effect is always accomplished and prospered by God. These three promises are in complete harmony with God’s Word always being efficacious. These promises also confirm that the Spirit works only through the Word.

Although the Pentecostals and charismatics can be understood for leaving their mainline churches for churches that taught faith in Jesus Christ and His miracles, the emphasis of the Holy Spirit working apart from the Word has been harmful and abusive. Someone can claim that the Spirit spoke in a dream and Brother Johnson has to leave to start a mission in Guatemala. If dreams count as revelations from God, the turmoil will never end and the damage done can be worse than the corpse-cold rationalism of the liberal, rationalistic denominations. Are we to believe that a program sold for profit is “anointed by the Holy Spirit?” Are other programs “very anointed” in a similar sales pitch?

All false doctrine comes from separating the Spirit from the Word. For example, the pope simply declares something to be true and that becomes an infallible revelation of God, because “the Holy Spirit will not let him err.” Roman Catholic visions are often cited as proof for their dogma, even when they come from visions of dead saints. Chemnitz observed that meant expanding the Bible and enrolling vast numbers of the dead into the teaching office of the Church.

Luther called all false doctrine Enthusiasm, a term not often used or defined. However, it gathers everything into two categories – either in harmony with the Scriptures or declared apart from and against the Bible. World religions may be interesting to study from a historical or cultural viewpoint, but they do not have the standing and credibility of the Scriptures. That is the historic view of the Scriptures.

The inerrancy of the Scriptures has been targeted by the hot-headed apostates who formed the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA). They claimed inerrancy was a new word and not appropriate for the Bible. Luther used the Latin words for inerrant and infallible in his Large Catechism, Holy Baptism. The actual reason for inerrant replacing infallible for God’s Word was the slithering of the compromisers who said the Bible was infallible, except for its historical and geographical passages. That is like saying the limousine is perfect, except for the smoking engine and the clanking transmission.

A professor at Concordia Seminary, Ft. Wayne, asked the class for a description of Karl Barth’s perspective. As a visitor, I said, “According to Barth, we should study with the Bible in one hand and a newspaper in the other.” The seminary professor smiled in agreement. I added, “Others would say Barth was more like – a newspaper in one hand and a Kalashnikov in the other, while standing on the Bible.” He frowned at the truth of those words.*

* The future Objective Justification advocate, Jay Webber, was furious with me for upsetting the apostate seminary professor.

Barth is now known to be a Marxist, a flagrant adulterer, and a mentor who used his live-in mistress to write most of his Dogmatics without giving her credit.*

* Barth’s living and traveling accommodations are well known – they included his mistress Charlotte Kirschbaum. Karl Barth and Radical Politics uncovers his early and late Marxism.

Figure 9 Karl Barth moved the younger, unmarried Charlotte Kirschbaum into his house, in spite of his wife and children.

Figure 10 Karl Barth’s writing stopped when Charlotte died.

Figure 11 I met the author and his first wife at Yale. This book reveals how Karl and Charlotte were Marxist activists. Hunsinger was the head of the Barth Institute at Princeton University.

The work of the Spirit and Word together – and never apart from one another – is Biblical and therefore basic to all of Luther’s efforts in writing and preaching. The visible Word of Holy Communion and Holy Baptism have the same divine power as the invisible Word of preaching and teaching. If the spoken Word has power to bestow God’s grace upon an entire congregation, how much more does the visible Word help the individual to understand and appreciate faith in Jesus Christ as the meeting place for His forgiveness and salvation.

Denying the efficacy of the Word has made people turn to plagiarized sermons, purchased programs, and spiritual lethargy from the clergy down to the synod administrators. Luther – trusting in God’s Word – changed Germany, Europe, and the world.

Luther’s Publications Mortally Wounded the Church of Rome

Luther and the printing press arrived so powerfully that the Church of Rome could not kill, torture, imprison, and enslave Evangelicals fast enough to stop the Reformation. The Beast of Revelation*d was mortally wounded and never recovered its full strength in promoting error in the name of Mary, Purgatory, the Mass, and the infallibility of the pope. One part of the Reformation miracle was the built-up hunger of people for God’s love, grace, and forgiveness through the Savior. The instrument of communication was the printing press, but the energy came from Luther’s writing. An expert in early publishing stated:

* Revelation 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

Gutenberg had produced an orthodox Latin Bible and he had taken advantage of a large market of printed indulgences. Luther launched the Reformation by an attack on indulgences and he dethroned the Latin Bible from the heart of Western Christendom, but he used the printing press as no one had ever done before. Over 3,700 separate editions of books and pamphlets by Martin Luther were published in his lifetime, not including Bible translations. This is an immense number for any one author, even by today’s standards. It is an average of almost two publications a week for most of his adult life. In his time, Luther was by far the most extensively published author who had ever lived. (Christopher De Hamel, The Book, A History of the Bible, p 236, 2001.)

Luther, Melanchthon, and the Concordists

Luther attracted and worked with brilliant men who wrote in harmony with him. Melanchthon was his younger associate from the beginning, an acclaimed scholar and editor/author of the Augsburg Confession and its defense – The Apology. Fifty years after Augsburg Confession, Martin Chemnitz and others collected doctrinal confessions in the Book of Concord, which included the Formula of Concord, 1580. Chemnitz was a student of Luther and Melanchthon, with the best qualities of most men. This second Reformation generation of Biblical scholars dealt with issues about false doctrine and defended clearly the Scriptural truths of the Reformation – Justification by Faith, the efficacy of the Word and Sacraments, and the inerrancy of the Scriptures. They began with the Three Ecumenical Creeds, included vital statements by Luther and Melanchthon, and created harmony (concordia in Latin) with a variety of issues in the 1580 Formula of Concord. However, the Reformation and the Book of Concord era have been neglected and supplanted by the insights of Zwingli, Calvin, and Robert Schuller.

Zwingli and Calvin, Alienation from the Word/Spirit Connection

Zwingli first – and Calvin later – appeared to agree with Luther, but they were not charter members of the Reformation, as many imagine. Chemnitz, in his Apology of the Book of Concord, compared the Calvinists humorously to tenants who claimed everything would be fine if only the landlords would agree to their demands. The Zwinglians and Calvinists eventually conceded their departure from the efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace. Although they became bold in their disagreement with Luther, they became uncertain about forgiveness and salvation. For Calvin, God being sovereign meant that no one knew if the Spirit would be active in a given sermon, baptism, or Lord’s Supper. The emphasis shifted from the certainty of God’s Word in preaching, teaching, and the Sacraments (the Means of Grace) to hoping for results, shifting the responsibility to man.

Their dogma can be summed up as the rejection of the Holy Spirit and Word always at work together, not a small matter, but a breech. For instance, Zwingli mockingly stated that the Holy Spirit did not need a vehicle, like an oxcart, as his response to the Real Presence of Christ in Holy Communion. His rejection of the Sacraments of Holy Baptism and Holy Communion, making them merely symbolic, caused the Anabaptists to leave and become persecuted and drowned by the Zwinglians. Calvin openly mocked the presence of Christ in both natures in Holy Communion, and he placed human reason above the Scriptures. That magisterial use of human reason was employed to judge, explain, and make the Word of God appealing. The magisterial use of reason made it man’s job to get the work done, a tragic departure from “I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth.”

As The Other Side of Calvinism has shown so abundantly, all five categories of the five-points of Calvinism are disputed by its theologians, either one point or another. Ironically, when Lutherans abandon Scriptural certainty and clarity, they inevitably move toward Calvinism or allegiance to Rome.

The effect upon translations is immense and difficult to correct, once adopted and deployed in millions of Bibles, church textbooks, and devotional booklets.

Continued in Part VI.Tyndale Perfected in English What Luther Created in German

All sections of The King James Version: Precise Translation versus Fraudulent Texts and Heretical Translations