The Foundations Under Attack The Roots of Apostasy
The apostasy in the twentieth century; the compromise on essentials and the attack on the fundamentals actually have their roots in the nineteenth century.
Continue reading →The apostasy in the twentieth century; the compromise on essentials and the attack on the fundamentals actually have their roots in the nineteenth century.
Continue reading →This is the next chapter of the book, The Foundations Under Attack: The Roots of Apostasy – By Michael de Semlyen B. Papal Rome and the EU Richard Bennett and Michael de Semlyen Papal Rome is widely respected and admired by the world. She is seen as well organized, successful and influential, as well as dignified and authoritative. The aura of uncritical acclaim around the person of successive popes is … Continue reading →
The Scriptures are full of warnings and admonitions to keep us all on the narrow path and by Scripture to reprove, correct and instruct in righteousness.
Continue reading →True ecumenical unity is clearly defined in the Scriptures. There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all,
Continue reading →The Vatican has been the most powerful institution in Europe, and although its influence declined at the time of the Reformation it made a significant recovery in the past two centuries
Continue reading →Many of the alternative media broadcast hosts discuss the Jewish neo-conservatives, Zionist Jews, and the Mossad, while, for the most part, ignoring the Jesuit Order, its Knights of Malta, and other Jesuit-controlled agents of Papal Rome that control and steer these groups.
Continue reading →John Wesley’s Arminian teachings had inspired the founders of The Holiness Movement. In time this would become identified with “The Baptism of the Holy Spirit” and the speaking with tongues of Pentecostalism and the Charismatic Movement.
Continue reading →Charles Finney was the man who created the “decisionism” concept in evangelism, where a person is led through an “altar call” and is pressured to “decide for Christ.”
Continue reading →The Arminians can find their cherished semi-Pelagian views on free will enshrined in the decrees of the notorious Council of Trent.
Continue reading →The significance of the Mexican celebration of Cinco de Mayo in regards to thwarting Jesuit plans to take over the United States of America.
Continue reading →This is the next chapter of the book, The Foundations Under Attack: The Roots of Apostasy – By Michael de Semlyen This article talks about the differences between Calvinism and Arminianism. I personally don’t understand why theologians want to debate doctrines like this. Neither John Calvin nor James Arminius taught me the Gospel of Christ. I want to get my doctrines straight from the Word of God, from the Bible, … Continue reading →
Modern Bible translations diminish the divinity of Christ & undermine the Atonement. They are also markedly ecumenical, lending support to Roman Catholic dogma.
Continue reading →My good friend Reinhard from the Netherlands sent this to me. He says it’s part of a seminar he gave to the college of his Baptist Congregation about Jacob and Esau. I value history and this article certainly has information I was not aware of! The emphasis in underline are mine. “Behold, your house is left desolate for you,” Matt. 23:38. “If they build, I will destroy” Mal. 1:4. “The … Continue reading →
The greatest haters (also the greatest torturers and mass murderers) in the world are the prelates (i.e., the high-ranking clergy) of the Roman Catholic Church-State
Continue reading →My one object has been to defeat the mischievous attempt, which was made in 1881 to thrust upon this Church and Realm a revision of the Sacred Text, which recommended though it be by eminent names, I am thoroughly convinced, and am able to prove, is untrustworthy from beginning to end.
Continue reading →The 1881 committee that produced the Revised Version, the mother of the majority of today’s modem versions, was unimpressed with the weight of the evidence supporting the Received Text, which had been used for English translations by William Tyndale, John Rogers, and Miles Coverdale, as well as later by the 1611 translators.
Continue reading →