↓
 
Home→Adventures→Unintended Conversation with an AI Chatbot?

Comments

Unintended Conversation with an AI Chatbot? — 5 Comments

  1. I encountered what I think was an AI bot recently. IT “she” was representing a property management company. She wanted information from me regarding my zip code and if/where I was looking into renting property. After my encounter with her I researched the company and found a phone number. When I called it, guess what, I got her again asking for the same information before I could proceed. I continuously asked to speak to a real person buy she refused unless I gave her my information. I asked her many questions knowing that she was a bot and she continued to exchange with me.
    I asked if she was a bot. She answered that she was simply a programmed interface.
    I asked if she had a soul. She answered that she did not.
    I asked if she had a conscience. She answered that she did not.
    I explained to her that if she did not have a conscience, I would not be able to trust anything she “said” and that she was unable to know right from wrong or know the difference between a lie and the truth.
    She thanked me for the insight but continued to refuse access to a real person.
    The phone number she called is on the national do not call registry. I filed a complaint with the FTC giving them the information regarding the BOT and the company that was using “her” as a data collection point and a “gatekeeper” not allowing human contact in any form until I supplied her required protocol.
    The real estate company she represented is a multi-billion-dollar company with what I found has many lawsuits. I would never give anyone that calls me any personal information for any reason.
    I hope that this helps in some way. Thanks

  2. Yep, a chinese bot would be my guess. Definitely not a human. I see this all the time. I’ve been writing and editing for more than 30 years and this ain’t no human. Few of these chat functions are human if you ask me.

    • I think so too, Donna. And I think the scammer is not too smart to claim not to be a technical person and yet use the AI bot to spew out technical information that only a technical person would know! That’s what gave it away. It sounded just like what the AI chatbot on my phone would say about web development.

  3. Very strange and in quite a suspicious way as to what is Shirley really looking for. The conversation never went to where she said she wanted to hear your views and opinions. She would jump to commenting on where you have lived and are living now to browsing in your profile and talking and questioning about Chicago. Then on to more questions and comments as to what work you do which is IT. She is “not technical” but certainly sounds very familiar with website building, codes, and programming. and then “friends”, “before we meet”, then onto sharing selfies with each other so that we can get to know each other better.”
    Wow! Yikes! I agree with your wife Tess that was a good point in this “conversation” to end it with “Shirley.” I think Shirley may be a real person using AI Chatbot to seek out certain targets that she somehow targets for “suspicious” purposes that you also think might be for use in blackmail once things developed as it looks like that is where she was heading toward.
    Wow – scammers really are getting sophisticated and AI is a great helper for them in their activities.
    Thanks for relaying this event James. It is something to look out for!

    • Thank you Jackie for your good comments! When “Shirley” told me she isn’t a technical person and yet tells me all sorts of technical jargon that my wife had never heard of, it clearly sounded like something that would come out of AI Chat GPT. And exchanging selfies? LOL! That’s something only a scammer would say.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

↑