The Bible, Critical Theory, and Critical Race Theory, Part 1
Throughout human history, God’s Word has been attacked, first by Satan, then by those who follow him.
Continue reading →Throughout human history, God’s Word has been attacked, first by Satan, then by those who follow him.
Continue reading →Five important reasons why the King James Version of the Bible is the best English language Bible and superior to modern English translations.
Continue reading →Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort were two Anglican scholars known for their critical edition of the Greek New Testament, published in 1881. They are exposed as agents for the Vatican to derail Protestantism.
Continue reading →The consistent dispensationalist is a theologian in the grip of an idea — the idea that there is a strong dichotomy between Israel and the church. This idea is a relatively modern theory in the history of doctrine that was initially developed and popularized by J. N. Darby (1800-1882), the father of dispensational thought.
Continue reading →Textus Receptus is Latin for “Received Text.” It was used as the textual base for the vernacular translations that arose during the Reformation period.
Continue reading →This article proves all modern translations of the New Testament have errors and omissions because they are not based on the Textus Receptus Greek manuscript. It also shows that the statement in the New International Version (NIV), about Mark 16:9-20 which says, “The earliest manuscripts and some other ancient witnesses do not have verses 9-20” is false!
Continue reading →World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its religious orientation. The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield’s role was to rewrite the King James Version of the Bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and at the bottom of the pages.
Continue reading →As we saw in part 1, the first century already bore witness to the Great Tribulation, and dispensationalists are needlessly positioning the world on a collision course for World War III. As foreign policy expert Mike Minnicino puts it, “For these Christian Zionists, World War III is not a deterrent. It is a longed for goal.”
Continue reading →The word, “Godhead” is used in the King James Version instead of the word “Trinity” and it appears exactly three times!
Continue reading →The correct interpretation of Daniel chapter 9 and especially verse 27 is extremely important because it is the ‘linchpin’ of all Bible prophecy. If you don’t get it right, your interpretation of other prophecies in the Book of Daniel, Matthew 24, II Thessalonians 2:3,4, and the Book of Revelation will also be wrong!
Continue reading →Constantin Tischendorf deceived the academic Christian world with his promotion of the corrupt Sinaiticus manuscript of the New Testament.
Continue reading →The history of the men of God who worked at the risk of their lives to translate and publish God’s Word in English.
Continue reading →The Almighty God will come, as promised, His work before Him, as the Good Shepherd. Parallel to Psalm 23 and John 10, He will feed His flock.
Continue reading →God’s definition of effective is clearly revealed in Isaiah 55: 8 – For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.
Continue reading →Well researched reasons why the King James Version of the Bible is the most accurate translation in English, and a shocking account of apostate Lutherans who reject it!
Continue reading →A wise society takes God’s Word as the basis for justice. Society is now witnessing the tragic consequences when men throw out God’s Word or simply ignore it.”
Continue reading →Modern Bible translations diminish the divinity of Christ & undermine the Atonement. They are also markedly ecumenical, lending support to Roman Catholic dogma.
Continue reading →The 1881 committee that produced the Revised Version, the mother of the majority of today’s modem versions, was unimpressed with the weight of the evidence supporting the Received Text, which had been used for English translations by William Tyndale, John Rogers, and Miles Coverdale, as well as later by the 1611 translators.
Continue reading →